Subject: Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

From: Tim Chown <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 13:17:15 +0000

> On 28 Feb 2020, at 01:51, Brian E Carpenter <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Pablo,
> 
> I have been looking at the latest version. See my previous note to Stefano Salsano. I really think that the problem here is that certain things are obvious to SRH experts but not to others, and they simply need more explanation in elementary terms.

Exactly this.  The text has ambiguities due to the language used.  That (at a minimum) needs to be fixed before advancing.

Tim