Subject: [Srcomp] REQ 4.1.1 and 4.1.5

From: Ron Bonica <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 18:55:20 +0000

Folks,

I think that the best way to reach consensus around Requirements 4.1.1 and 4.1.5 is to have a more focused discussion of Rationale. In each section, the Rationale subsections should contain a table.

The table should look like this:

Population 1
Population 2
Population 3
Benefit 1
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Benefit 2
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No
Benefit 3
Yes or No
Yes or No
Yes or No

The Populations might include:

  *   Vendors
  *   Operators who deploy Classic SRv6 before the compression mechanism is available and then upgrade
  *   Operators who deploy SRv6 after the compression mechanism is available
  *   Others?

Benefits might include:

  *   Code reuse
  *   Bandwidth savings from hybrid (Classic and compressed) SRv6
  *   Others?
                                                                                                   Ron

Juniper Business Use Only