From nobody Mon Aug 13 14:21:44 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDE01310DD for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:21:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.501 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=shockey.us Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RUeZHlz-kUrX for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68391130E3E for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmgw15.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.15]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1C21E0CC7 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:21:36 -0600 (MDT) Received: from box462.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.62]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id pKHQfpdtuj0sopKHQfPNaR; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:21:36 -0600 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-transfer-encoding:Content-type:Mime-version:Message-ID: To:From:Subject:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=SiqHnQwIpURlKGp4ddEmSw99rCoU9f6jrZIlnXgyf1E=; b=QXixArY9prn2hvNn5qDfU9580n BLjDFwDn/tAv0dyEp3v7VM2HhXHcJKVChvQSHpUp6qoUNyEcjOAKAznivFrDVZaC2zPEgc6I9ksyn zIIjlD1/VqGpcaQNysfE5DGVq; Received: from pool-108-56-135-188.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([108.56.135.188]:58943 helo=[192.168.1.155]) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fpKHP-003WLK-Th for stir@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:21:36 -0600 User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.f.0.180709 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 17:21:34 -0400 From: Richard Shockey To: "stir@ietf.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: A note from the FCC... FYI Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box462.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - shockey.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 108.56.135.188 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1fpKHP-003WLK-Th X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: pool-108-56-135-188.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([192.168.1.155]) [108.56.135.188]:58943 X-Source-Auth: richard+shockey.us X-Email-Count: 2 X-Source-Cap: c2hvY2tleXU7c2hvY2tleXU7Ym94NDYyLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ== X-Local-Domain: yes Archived-At: Subject: [stir] A note from the FCC... FYI X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 21:21:42 -0000 https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-18-842A1.pdf =20 With this Public Notice, we seek to refresh the record on how the Commissio= n might further empower voice service providers to block illegal calls1 before they reach A= merican consumers. In the March 2017 Call Blocking NPRM and NOI, the Commission began an inquiry into= provider-initiated call blocking. In the Call Blocking Report and Order and Further Notice, the Com= mission adopted rules expressly authorizing providers to block clearly defined categories of call= s highly likely to be illegal and sought comment on two issues related to blocking those calls. We now seek t= o refresh the record in response to the Call Blocking NPRM and NOI on additional criteria voice pro= viders could use to identify and block illegal calls. Our goal in seeking additional comment is to ident= ify specific, enforceable criteria for targeting illegal calls that cannot be abused5 while ensuring providers= have sufficient flexibility available to adapt to dynamic calling patterns. We encourage commenters to = address these general goals when commenting on the questions below. [snip] =E2=80=94=20 Richard Shockey Shockey Consulting LLC Chairman of the Board SIP Forum www.shockey.us www.sipforum.org richardshockey.us Skype-Linkedin-Facebook =E2=80=93Twitter rshockey101 PSTN +1 703-593-2683 =20 From nobody Mon Aug 13 15:07:52 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3020B1310EC for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:07:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=shockey.us Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ulJ5lEQt_Iq6 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EE71126F72 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 15:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmgw13.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.13]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA301E1534 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 16:07:47 -0600 (MDT) Received: from box462.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.62]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id pL06ffz5dYe1jpL06fHWO2; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 16:07:47 -0600 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-transfer-encoding:Content-type:Mime-version:Message-ID: To:From:Subject:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nDLegXM61MsRaJbS0hl3sy1SSD7MXaoa6EnsJekV5RU=; b=OKriU9JjiJ8DbFQuXcB4hRy9f4 62XbPJwlpArBnBsjPeytMNVy3P1gOp+Sb+GuSpmUVtJqEJLcsS67DMAhP6p6/HSL395DnroUS3BfB Mq2aCLKXWxfzJg0sm05nqc2Ig; Received: from pool-108-56-135-188.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([108.56.135.188]:58984 helo=[192.168.1.155]) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fpL06-003toe-KK for stir@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 16:07:46 -0600 User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.f.0.180709 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 18:07:45 -0400 From: Richard Shockey To: "stir@ietf.org" Message-ID: <6D0776FF-7A41-499B-8C30-F81C7139DF6A@shockey.us> Thread-Topic: [stir] A note from the FCC... FYI Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box462.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - shockey.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 108.56.135.188 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1fpL06-003toe-KK X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: pool-108-56-135-188.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([192.168.1.155]) [108.56.135.188]:58984 X-Source-Auth: richard+shockey.us X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: c2hvY2tleXU7c2hvY2tleXU7Ym94NDYyLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ== X-Local-Domain: yes Archived-At: Subject: Re: [stir] A note from the FCC... FYI X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:07:50 -0000 I forgot to note ... vote early vote often.=20 =20 =EF=BB=BFOn 8/13/18, 5:21 PM, "stir on behalf of Richard Shockey" wrote: =20 https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-18-842A1.pdf =20 =20 With this Public Notice, we seek to refresh the record on how the Commi= ssion might further empower voice service providers to block illegal calls1 before they rea= ch American consumers. In the March 2017 Call Blocking NPRM and NOI, the Commission began an inquiry = into provider-initiated call blocking. In the Call Blocking Report and Order and Further Notice, the= Commission adopted rules expressly authorizing providers to block clearly defined categories of = calls highly likely to be illegal and sought comment on two issues related to blocking those calls. We now se= ek to refresh the record in response to the Call Blocking NPRM and NOI on additional criteria voice= providers could use to identify and block illegal calls. Our goal in seeking additional comment is to i= dentify specific, enforceable criteria for targeting illegal calls that cannot be abused5 while ensuring provi= ders have sufficient flexibility available to adapt to dynamic calling patterns. We encourage commenters= to address these general goals when commenting on the questions below. [snip] =20 =E2=80=94=20 Richard Shockey =20 Shockey Consulting LLC =20 Chairman of the Board SIP Forum =20 www.shockey.us =20 www.sipforum.org =20 richardshockey.us =20 Skype-Linkedin-Facebook =E2=80=93Twitter rshockey101 =20 PSTN +1 703-593-2683 =20 =20 =20 =20 _______________________________________________ stir mailing list stir@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir =20 From nobody Wed Aug 15 12:46:53 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stir@ietf.org Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D0E130DEB; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:46:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool To: Cc: stir@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com, adam@nostrum.com, stir-chairs@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <153436241095.3151.7911025098129971375.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:46:50 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [stir] stir - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 103 X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:46:51 -0000 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Russ Housley, a Chair of the stir working group. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited Area Name: Applications and Real-Time Area Session Requester: Russ Housley Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 1 Hour Number of Attendees: 60 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: curdle sipbrandy ipwave modern ice secdispatch sipcore mmusic rtcweb avtcore ecrit tls acme lamps suit saag Second Priority: perc slim clue ace oauth dispatch People who must be present: Russ Housley Sean Turner Adam Roach Robert Sparks Jon Peterson Chris Wendt Resources Requested: Special Requests: --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Wed Aug 15 12:57:49 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stir@ietf.org Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C563130F81 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:57:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.83.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <153436306737.3180.14426570433376690883.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:57:47 -0700 From: IETF Secretariat Archived-At: Subject: [stir] Milestones changed for stir WG X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:57:47 -0000 Added milestone "Submit PASSporT Extension for Resource Priority Authorization for publication as Proposed Standard", due July 2018. Added milestone "Submit PASSPorT SHAKEN extension for publication as Proposed Standard", due September 2018. Added milestone "Submit PASSPorT extension for diverted calls as Proposed Standard", due September 2018. Changed milestone "Submit out-of-band mechanism for Proposed Standard", set description to "Submit out-of-band architecture and use-cases for Informational", set due date to November 2018 from November 2017, added draft-ietf-stir-oob to milestone. Added milestone "Submit PASSPorT Extension for rich call data for publication as Proposed Standard", due December 2018. Changed milestone "Submit Privacy analysis for Informational", set due date to March 2019 from March 2018. URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/stir/about/ From nobody Tue Aug 21 18:17:13 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F389130DE6; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:17:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.78 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.78 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=standardstrack.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id roSmFrXak2vP; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biz221.inmotionhosting.com (biz221.inmotionhosting.com [23.235.223.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66E0130DD6; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:17:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=standardstrack.com; s=default; h=References:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CEVjE9b/Rx9lx9ukCRcX/5Q8PmHeWAhVq2RVraAq3AQ=; b=mlHE+siJkvlV4N7kC1TqAodRD vEOMpwsoOHdDiQc/05nWETYVa5KJ0rqGjf9e5bi6myAtKT5TQmXaZBlJV3YeY2RPQKRwyRv1PeZeH 761Fc6ym76aq7ciyjnIqizGobvDCgLXb7wk5tKpk47A7EBDfPDINS1a2HFMEQhDkQHysU=; Received: from [68.100.196.217] (port=58425 helo=[192.168.10.26]) by biz221.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fsHlZ-00BzwM-Ks; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:17:03 -0700 From: Eric Burger Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_184EF0DA-FDF9-4294-8FAF-A8EBC70BFE53"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:16:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <153489089840.9456.7130634417063496277@ietfa.amsl.com> Cc: stir@ietf.org To: sipcore@ietf.org References: <153489089840.9456.7130634417063496277@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz221.inmotionhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz221.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: eburger+standardstrack.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed X-Authenticated-Sender: biz221.inmotionhosting.com: eburger@standardstrack.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Archived-At: Subject: Re: [stir] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-00.txt X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 01:17:06 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_184EF0DA-FDF9-4294-8FAF-A8EBC70BFE53 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Of interest to the STIR community, but please keep the discussion on the = SIPCORE list. Updated the Security Considerations section to reflect Tolga=E2=80=99s = better articulation of the smurf attack and the vCard integrity / = traceability attack. We don=E2=80=99t have a protocol method to address = the vCard issue, but I will talk with the card people as there is a = draft over there that is 30% of the solution. Comments welcome. > On Aug 21, 2018, at 6:34 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >=20 >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts = directories. > This draft is a work item of the Session Initiation Protocol Core WG = of the IETF. >=20 > Title : A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Response = Code for Rejected Calls > Author : Eric W. Burger > Filename : draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-00.txt > Pages : 15 > Date : 2018-08-21 >=20 > Abstract: > This document defines the 608 (Rejected) SIP response code. This > response code enables calling parties to learn their call was > rejected by an intermediary and will not be answered. As a 6xx = code, > the caller will be aware that future attempts to contact the same = UAS > will be likely to fail. The present use case driving the need for > the 608 response code is when the intermediary is an analytics > engine. In this case, the rejection is by a machine or other > process. This contrasts with the 607 (Unwanted) SIP response code, > which a human at the target UAS indicated the call was not wanted. > In some jurisdictions this distinction is important and may have > additional requirements beyond the 607 response code. Specifically, > this document defines the use of the Call-Info header in 608 > responses to enable rejected callers to contact entities that = blocked > their calls in error. >=20 >=20 > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected/ >=20 > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-00 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-00 >=20 >=20 > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of = submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >=20 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >=20 > _______________________________________________ > sipcore mailing list > sipcore@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore --Apple-Mail=_184EF0DA-FDF9-4294-8FAF-A8EBC70BFE53 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEfEc/N7T7IfiAuDEHDDCGh758rskFAlt8uYYACgkQDDCGh758 rskH4BAAiZhYKIkS+KFu+KVjYWWCSLi5sW4eG5OCPLXn+nFXffU8KREb2LLvh6Js uEESMAAkG3VOfQhwdPbVkJLbcv35F2LV3MMknX3vSWG8qYYOqZuaaTKb+KMdB/iL 442h/rKPHzVBdu15+WwzaJlbf4CRL7M7H6l9OfIYmt8t4VataJ2akuNYcj21tcL/ PFTTq4ttlTiOKBof7U0wxeUGom+kBHqQ6lipR99Ut1cNls6LVTThitnOXdrZzJV7 bQg2LcOjknXkyAze1ZPkAoFZwKGGf/R/Cig6DVvYUbr/AwxLv9DYh+R8h/i5U2ER YMHnPaiCmubL6/LGJNcV0wgvFiTjA81Sr6wdBWWnSi7Fhuu14HtMLFJK4cXjlPPl XOK1tGb5l/7FvqaFwjYY9xxkb9QdeAHazMpiDVxXUk3q7zgKMYZOH9/DyLwAN6Vo Xuz/RMVlEivDKy6GRqCo/UXsQpU04FjU2bI7AwxiozJUl8YnHCQo4SOpyr1+flpF XNPoHzh+49ppBZIZ+jTrJH2E7T7vMnlsmVQv7uBbUQNt1f9SP0E6jcQkpezb6VkV vx4R3nXE8J3AITumKndMJBfugtRrL1aV0UiHM4EuBR+J3CXE3K37lWkMqavYXGwP v7gV5l+Kzl9dOgw3i7hDI0PmF5ffyjF9Ie5m/9exXCkosMfmDow= =3mes -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_184EF0DA-FDF9-4294-8FAF-A8EBC70BFE53-- From nobody Wed Aug 22 09:02:39 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2064B130EA8 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:02:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66bNCf1_hfCD for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C40130EA5 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49FC3005D4 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:02:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id VsrYR7kvyrPO for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:02:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.100.1.20] (44-0.dc.icann.org [192.0.44.0]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C6593002C6; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:02:32 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) From: Russ Housley In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:02:32 -0400 Cc: IETF STIR Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <152147952053.31056.3563220954085220104@ietfa.amsl.com> To: Chris Wendt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [stir] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02.txt X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 16:02:38 -0000 Section 8, Order of Claim Keys, now says: The order of the claim keys MUST follow the rules of [RFC8225] Section 9 and be in lexixgraphic order. Therefore, the claim keys MUST appear in the PASSporT Payload in the following order, o attest o dest o iat o orig o origid I assume that other extensions will be specified in the future, so I am = wondering if it would be better to say: 8. Order of Claim Keys The order of the claim keys MUST follow the rules of [RFC8225] Section 9; the claim keys MUST appear in lexicographic order. Therefore, the claim keys discussed in this document appear in the PASSporT Payload in the following order: o attest o dest o iat o orig o origid Russ > On Mar 19, 2018, at 1:20 PM, Chris Wendt = wrote: >=20 > Hi All, >=20 > I have updated the draft with some fixes based on comments from = Christer, both editorial and related to ordering comments. >=20 > Summary of changes: >=20 > - addressing Christer=E2=80=99s comments around order of claims adding = a brief new section > - clarified the definition of =E2=80=9Ccustomer=E2=80=9D in the = PASSporT =E2=80=98attest=E2=80=99 claim section 4 > - clarified that it is calling party telephone number that is being = attested to in same section > - removed last sentence in section 7, it=E2=80=99s repetitive and not = needed. >=20 > I figured i would include these changes and update document for = efficiency, but will review these in meeting on Thursday in either case. >=20 > -Chris >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On Mar 19, 2018, at 5:12 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts = directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Secure Telephone Identity Revisited = WG of the IETF. >>=20 >> Title : PASSporT SHAKEN Extension (SHAKEN) >> Authors : Chris Wendt >> Mary Barnes >> Filename : draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02.txt >> Pages : 7 >> Date : 2018-03-19 >>=20 >> Abstract: >> This document extends PASSporT, which is a token object that conveys >> cryptographically-signed information about the participants involved >> in communications, to include information defined as part of the >> SHAKEN specification from ATIS (Alliance for Telecommunications >> Industry Solutions) and the SIP Forum IP-NNI Joint Task Force. = These >> extensions provide a level of confidence in the correctness of the >> originating identity for a telephone network that has communications >> coming from both STIR participating originating communications as >> well as communications that does not include STIR information. >>=20 >>=20 >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken/ >>=20 >> There are also htmlized versions available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02 >> = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02 >>=20 >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-stir-passport-shaken-02 >>=20 >>=20 >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of = submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>=20 >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> stir mailing list >> stir@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir >=20 > _______________________________________________ > stir mailing list > stir@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir From nobody Fri Aug 31 17:56:46 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D57130EA7; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mPu1IZI_92p0; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D000130E84; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4B0ECB80831; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:07 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, stir@ietf.org Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20180901005607.4B0ECB80831@rfc-editor.org> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [stir] =?utf-8?q?RFC_8443_on_Personal_Assertion_Token_=28PASSpor?= =?utf-8?q?T=29_Extension_for_Resource_Priority_Authorization?= X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 00:56:35 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8443 Title: Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) Extension for Resource Priority Authorization Author: R. Singh, M. Dolly, S. Das, A. Nguyen Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: August 2018 Mailbox: rsingh@vencorelabs.com, md3135@att.com, sdas@vencorelabs.com, an.p.nguyen@hq.dhs.gov Pages: 10 Characters: 21623 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-stir-rph-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8443 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8443 This document extends the Personal Assertion Token (PASSporT) specification defined in RFC 8225 to allow the inclusion of cryptographically signed assertions of authorization for the values populated in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) 'Resource-Priority' header field, which is used for communications resource prioritization. This document is a product of the Secure Telephone Identity Revisited Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC