
From phdgang@gmail.com  Mon Oct 28 23:59:50 2013
Return-Path: <phdgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504E321F9DFA for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150,  BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wUVYBe-XriO5 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22b.google.com (mail-qa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D5211E8222 for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i13so2683222qae.2 for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LZ8zxEenAIIxp61OeTkwFcBTuehoM20nddz7MutbrKY=; b=XuWRJC/WjmcQMx+ZgT6WCxpmGCB0qceHId/oHsAOdP9MTmcqCOsOY8VUIFJjfpsgXl UvXuoj5vEbx9qJtzR1oppsISTMaTul0DXJe0c4RsY7n0sJhoBB82SIZwLOt3o9x8OetF cwEmNO01WQHhk5IFecEtYq3Mq7ltM6Oa2fXP7mW60qtUPO6eee8czwH+aOpu2ps+74CY blSn8OC0ch63IOpuef9GIJMV/B+/+/9yAKh67eB/YiQROoYKsdctikyoUi4yy8k46qqs vrjKPaFEcA6zfUZe1V/aOq40sRyJqrR9FGk62bxcp6Nn7V/NozLBhp/Bk3mfD/QcVz21 i8ow==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.5.231 with SMTP id v7mr33942809qev.58.1383029987002; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.204.4 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM+vMESUNsNc_QLq2uHeySXsy9oDa9eRJw11zhmjdX1n-+=Kow@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAM+vMESUNsNc_QLq2uHeySXsy9oDa9eRJw11zhmjdX1n-+=Kow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 14:59:46 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM+vMETYZ5h1jg2h3eP2kVWyzcwTMm4pNMR5g9ghaTu=MKKsPA@mail.gmail.com>
From: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: sunset4-chairs <sunset4-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>, Chris Donley <c.donley@cablelabs.com>, Tina <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
Subject: [sunset4] Reserve a time slot for the presentation of NAT64-port allocation
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sunset4>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 06:59:50 -0000

I guess it's better to open this message to wg and get comments.
Actually, there are several drafts on the table regarding the NAT64
port allocation.
For example, draft-chen-sunset4-cgn-port-allocation,
draft-tsou-behave-natx4-log-reduction and
draft-donley-behave-deterministic-cgn
The authors would like to work together and meet the current charter item:
Submit NAT64 portallocation and address sharing methods to IESG
forconsideration as an Informational RFC

We would like to make a joint presentation in the meeting. If there is
any comments/suggestions for this convergence, we would be much
appreciated.

Best Regards

Gang

2013/10/29, GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>:
> Dear chairs,
>
> We intend to the make a joint presentation in Sunset4 for a converged
> draft of NAT64-port allocation.
> The new draft is not available at this time. We are trying to upload
> when there is a clear thought how to combine different drafts.
> The presentation in this meeting would like to propose some ideas for
> the converged items.
> We expect to receive the feedback from wg for the next step.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Gang
>
