From nobody Tue May 3 11:48:20 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1ED12D157 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:48:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.217 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.217 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ULJV2MO27Kae for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BECB12D5B1 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 11:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CNV87236; Tue, 03 May 2016 18:48:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA416-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.35) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:48:09 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA509-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.235]) by SZXEMA416-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 4 May 2016 02:48:04 +0800 From: "Liushucheng (Will)" To: Nevil Brownlee , SUPA list Thread-Topic: [Supa] DRAFT minutes for SUPA WG at IETF 95 Thread-Index: AQHRmrXzDxu/BjVYqEKPQc/1QKMyC5+noZoQ Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 18:48:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5716F946.7000703@auckland.ac.nz> In-Reply-To: <5716F946.7000703@auckland.ac.nz> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.151.103] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0205.5728F26B.01A5, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.2.235, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 86511cd26cc8bc221988ad2509203a77 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Supa] DRAFT minutes for SUPA WG at IETF 95 X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 18:48:19 -0000 >Bert: have not seem call for adoption in mailing list. want to review > the draft. Daniel King s/seem/seen and remove " Daniel King " =20 Should be=20 Bert: have not seen call for adoption in mailing list. want to review the draft.=20 The rests are fine with me.=20 Cheers, Will (Shucheng LIU) > -----Original Message----- > From: Supa [mailto:supa-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nevil Brownlee > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 11:37 PM > To: SUPA list > Cc: Nevil Brownlee > Subject: [Supa] DRAFT minutes for SUPA WG at IETF 95 >=20 >=20 > Hi all: >=20 > Thanks to Will(Shucheng) LIU for his careful note-taking! >=20 > Here is the first draft of the minutes of our WG meeting at IETF 95 in Bu= enos > Aires. >=20 > If you find any errors, or have suggestions for improvements (i.e. better= text ), > please send them to me at the address cced on this email. I plan to post= the > final version on the SUPA Proceedings page on about 26 April. >=20 > Cheers, Nevil >=20 >=20 > SUPA Minutes by Will(Shucheng) LIU and Nevil Brownlee >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions WG (supa) Agenda for IETF 95, Bueno= s > Aires (95-minutes-00) Friday, 8 April 2016, 1220-1320, Atlantico C > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D >=20 > Chairs: > Nevil Brownlee > Daniel King >=20 > About 30 people present, plus 5 others on Meetecho and 7 on jabber. >=20 > AGENDA: >=20 > 1. Note Well, Agenda review, Scribes =3D 2 min >=20 > Chairs: Main focus is to get our deliverables going. No changes to the > proposed agenda. >=20 > 2. Update from last meeting / WG Status (Nevil) =3D 3 min > - Call for adoption issued for Policy Model > - We need to decide on other drafts to adopt >=20 > Nevil gave a brief update from the last WG meeting. >=20 > 3. Current charter work items >=20 > a) Generic Policy Information Model =3D 10 min > draft-strassner-supa-generic-policy-info-model-05 > Presenter: John Strassner [JS] >=20 > JS: Motivation for building an information model is twofold > 1) policy spans many different actors (end-users, business people, > application developers, admins, ...) > 2) policies cover multiple technologies and abstractions > Hence, we need a consistent form and structure to enable > different actors to communicate with each other and work > together. Reminded that the WG chairs issued a call for > adoption. >=20 > Benoit: speak as a contributor: after checking the mailing list, > about the poll for adoption. Two questions: is it gppd work > to have IM? shall we publish this? The answers are, the > charter said we might work on IM and derive DM with IM. Then > nwe'll see in the end whether we should publish it. >=20 > JS: aggree, good advice. > Dan King: Who has read this draft? About 10 hands. > Dan King: Who think it would be a good start for a model, if we > decide to adopt? - aroud 20 hands. > >>> Chairs will ask again (on list) for adoption as WG item. >=20 >=20 > b) YANG Data Model Draft(s) =3D 10 > min > draft-halpern-supa-generic-policy-data-model-00 > Presenter: Joel [JH] >=20 > JH: Is the working group willing to adopt this draft? > Anh Le (Netcracker): Does this model nested policy (if then else if, etc)= ? > JH: The representation of property of policy is captured by IM. There > are clauses,e.g., in ECA there are E/ C/ A clauses, each is a class. > Bert: have not seem call for adoption in mailing list. want to review > the draft. Daniel King >=20 > Nevil: how many looked at the draft? - around 15 hands. > Andy Bieman: is this to be the solution for users of SUPA? > JH: Yes, this is the generic policy YANG DM, and hence, > a part of the SUPA solution. > Nevil: are people ok with calling for adoption? - around 10 hands > Bert: need more time to read it. > >>> Chairs will ask (on list) for adoption as WG item. >=20 >=20 > c) Applicability of SUPA =3D 10 min > draft-vadrevu-supa-applicability-06 > Presenter: Ying Chen [YC] >=20 > YC: Would like to see this I-D adopted by the WG. > Will: It has several use cases, may need a priority of them > YC: We have the actual use case that will be used in our network, > wewill focus on that. > Diego Lopez: We have three model drafts, how should we merge and use > them? > We need a single document describing the supa model. > Dan King: Combine the use cases, merging of the architecture doc. > Show how the architecture. > How many people have read this document? - around 15 hands > Nevil: There is a lot of work in here, but it's unclear how all of that > work meets the deliverables. Would like to see it more concise and > focused, it needs further discussion on the list. When it becomes > better define chairs will call for adoption as a WG item. >=20 >=20 > d) SUPA Framework & Architecture =3D 10 min > Presenter: Bert [BW] >=20 > BW: Proposes a path forward. Previous efforts were listed, asked a > set of questions that have been raised. proposed the formation > of a design team. > Andy Bierman: too complex, I like a solution in the scope, would like > to know who are implementing this and who will use it. >=20 > Nevil: We already have a design team - the group of authors that have > authored this draft (or all of us in SUPA?). > I'd like to keep the wg focussed on its charter deliverables. > Bert: Need an architecture, to clearly explain the particular > components to use. > JS: Charter didn't contain architecture, otherwise we need to recharter. > The IETF works bottom up, but architectures are done top-down. > Bert: Framework should be used. > Andy: Have a framework with no use cases, no need for a framework. > Benoit: The charter says ... [reading the charter] > JS: There are examples in the IM, there will be examples added to > the DM, applicability already has 5 use cases. > Nevil: discuss on list. > Joel: There are I-Ds out there, what is wrong with them? Why can't we > discuss these drafts and fix them, instead of starting from scratch? > Bert: I propose to have a design team to evaluate the exisitng ones. > Georgios: Ask the authors of framework, whether they like to join > the design team. Should discuss whether to work on exsitng or > write new ones. > Nevil: Chair position: all should comment on the existing draft > candidates on the mailing list, discuss what part(s) should be > improved - "send text for improvements to the list! > We're running out of time, we have a another presentation from Jun > Bi. >=20 >=20 > 4. Discussion: which drafts to adopt as WG items? =3D 5 min > Chairs will ask on list for adoption of IM and DM drafts > (marked >>> above) >=20 > 5. Any Other Business =3D > Remaining min >=20 > a) Problem Statement for Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions (SUPA) > draft-bi-supa-problem-statement-00 > Presenter: Jun BI [JB] > JB: This draft has existed for a while; the current version reflects > the changes that have been made to the supa value-proposition draft. >=20 > Nevil: how many read it? - around 10 hands > We want to see the discussion on this go on, in particular we need > more discussion on the IM and DM. More progress on DM would be > very welcome. >=20 > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Nevil Brownlee Computer Science > Department > Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941 The University of Auckland > FAX: +64 9 373 7453 Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Supa mailing list > Supa@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa From nobody Tue May 3 12:39:51 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C083712D608 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:39:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qiO9eMoep0F for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mh-1-1.lancs.ac.uk (mh-1-1.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.65.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB4312D5EB for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:39:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ex-1-ht0.lancs.ac.uk ([10.42.18.57] helo=EX-1-HT0.lancs.local) by mh-1-1.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1axgAW-0004ZS-95; Tue, 03 May 2016 20:39:40 +0100 Received: from EX-0-MB2.lancs.local ([fe80::9d98:936b:54d1:c531]) by EX-1-HT0.lancs.local ([fe80::d9e8:ad10:d075:a6b6%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Tue, 3 May 2016 20:39:39 +0100 From: "King, Daniel" To: "Liushucheng (Will)" , Nevil Brownlee , SUPA list Thread-Topic: [Supa] DRAFT minutes for SUPA WG at IETF 95 Thread-Index: AQHRmrXzDxu/BjVYqEKPQc/1QKMyC5+noZoQgAAPgnA= Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 19:39:39 +0000 Message-ID: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCE2848@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local> References: <5716F946.7000703@auckland.ac.nz> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [58.27.222.26] x-iss-local-domain: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Supa] DRAFT minutes for SUPA WG at IETF 95 X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 19:39:49 -0000 Thanks Will. Updated.=20 BR, Dan. -----Original Message----- From: Supa [mailto:supa-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Liushucheng (Will) Sent: 03 May 2016 23:48 To: Nevil Brownlee ; SUPA list Subject: Re: [Supa] DRAFT minutes for SUPA WG at IETF 95 >Bert: have not seem call for adoption in mailing list. want to review > the draft. Daniel King s/seem/seen and remove " Daniel King " =20 Should be Bert: have not seen call for adoption in mailing list. want to review the draft.=20 The rests are fine with me.=20 Cheers, Will (Shucheng LIU) > -----Original Message----- > From: Supa [mailto:supa-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nevil Brownlee > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 11:37 PM > To: SUPA list > Cc: Nevil Brownlee > Subject: [Supa] DRAFT minutes for SUPA WG at IETF 95 >=20 >=20 > Hi all: >=20 > Thanks to Will(Shucheng) LIU for his careful note-taking! >=20 > Here is the first draft of the minutes of our WG meeting at IETF 95 in=20 > Buenos Aires. >=20 > If you find any errors, or have suggestions for improvements (i.e.=20 > better text ), please send them to me at the address cced on this=20 > email. I plan to post the final version on the SUPA Proceedings page on = about 26 April. >=20 > Cheers, Nevil >=20 >=20 > SUPA Minutes by Will(Shucheng) LIU and Nevil Brownlee >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D > Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions WG (supa) Agenda for IETF 95,=20 > Buenos Aires (95-minutes-00) Friday, 8 April 2016, 1220-1320,=20 > Atlantico C =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >=20 > Chairs: > Nevil Brownlee > Daniel King >=20 > About 30 people present, plus 5 others on Meetecho and 7 on jabber. >=20 > AGENDA: >=20 > 1. Note Well, Agenda review, Scribes =3D 2 min >=20 > Chairs: Main focus is to get our deliverables going. No changes to the=20 > proposed agenda. >=20 > 2. Update from last meeting / WG Status (Nevil) =3D 3 min > - Call for adoption issued for Policy Model > - We need to decide on other drafts to adopt >=20 > Nevil gave a brief update from the last WG meeting. >=20 > 3. Current charter work items >=20 > a) Generic Policy Information Model =3D 10 min > draft-strassner-supa-generic-policy-info-model-05 > Presenter: John Strassner [JS] >=20 > JS: Motivation for building an information model is twofold > 1) policy spans many different actors (end-users, business people, > application developers, admins, ...) > 2) policies cover multiple technologies and abstractions > Hence, we need a consistent form and structure to enable > different actors to communicate with each other and work > together. Reminded that the WG chairs issued a call for > adoption. >=20 > Benoit: speak as a contributor: after checking the mailing list, > about the poll for adoption. Two questions: is it gppd work > to have IM? shall we publish this? The answers are, the > charter said we might work on IM and derive DM with IM. Then > nwe'll see in the end whether we should publish it. >=20 > JS: aggree, good advice. > Dan King: Who has read this draft? About 10 hands. > Dan King: Who think it would be a good start for a model, if we > decide to adopt? - aroud 20 hands. > >>> Chairs will ask again (on list) for adoption as WG item. >=20 >=20 > b) YANG Data Model Draft(s) =3D 10 > min > draft-halpern-supa-generic-policy-data-model-00 > Presenter: Joel [JH] >=20 > JH: Is the working group willing to adopt this draft? > Anh Le (Netcracker): Does this model nested policy (if then else if, etc)= ? > JH: The representation of property of policy is captured by IM. There > are clauses,e.g., in ECA there are E/ C/ A clauses, each is a class. > Bert: have not seem call for adoption in mailing list. want to review > the draft. Daniel King >=20 > Nevil: how many looked at the draft? - around 15 hands. > Andy Bieman: is this to be the solution for users of SUPA? > JH: Yes, this is the generic policy YANG DM, and hence, > a part of the SUPA solution. > Nevil: are people ok with calling for adoption? - around 10 hands > Bert: need more time to read it. > >>> Chairs will ask (on list) for adoption as WG item. >=20 >=20 > c) Applicability of SUPA =3D 10 min > draft-vadrevu-supa-applicability-06 > Presenter: Ying Chen [YC] >=20 > YC: Would like to see this I-D adopted by the WG. > Will: It has several use cases, may need a priority of them > YC: We have the actual use case that will be used in our network, > wewill focus on that. > Diego Lopez: We have three model drafts, how should we merge and use=20 > them? > We need a single document describing the supa model. > Dan King: Combine the use cases, merging of the architecture doc. > Show how the architecture. > How many people have read this document? - around 15 hands > Nevil: There is a lot of work in here, but it's unclear how all of that > work meets the deliverables. Would like to see it more concise and > focused, it needs further discussion on the list. When it becomes > better define chairs will call for adoption as a WG item. >=20 >=20 > d) SUPA Framework & Architecture =3D 10 min > Presenter: Bert [BW] >=20 > BW: Proposes a path forward. Previous efforts were listed, asked a > set of questions that have been raised. proposed the formation > of a design team. > Andy Bierman: too complex, I like a solution in the scope, would like > to know who are implementing this and who will use it. >=20 > Nevil: We already have a design team - the group of authors that have > authored this draft (or all of us in SUPA?). > I'd like to keep the wg focussed on its charter deliverables. > Bert: Need an architecture, to clearly explain the particular > components to use. > JS: Charter didn't contain architecture, otherwise we need to recharter. > The IETF works bottom up, but architectures are done top-down. > Bert: Framework should be used. > Andy: Have a framework with no use cases, no need for a framework. > Benoit: The charter says ... [reading the charter] > JS: There are examples in the IM, there will be examples added to > the DM, applicability already has 5 use cases. > Nevil: discuss on list. > Joel: There are I-Ds out there, what is wrong with them? Why can't we > discuss these drafts and fix them, instead of starting from scratch? > Bert: I propose to have a design team to evaluate the exisitng ones. > Georgios: Ask the authors of framework, whether they like to join > the design team. Should discuss whether to work on exsitng or > write new ones. > Nevil: Chair position: all should comment on the existing draft > candidates on the mailing list, discuss what part(s) should be > improved - "send text for improvements to the list! > We're running out of time, we have a another presentation from=20 > Jun Bi. >=20 >=20 > 4. Discussion: which drafts to adopt as WG items? =3D 5 min > Chairs will ask on list for adoption of IM and DM drafts > (marked >>> above) >=20 > 5. Any Other Business =3D > Remaining min >=20 > a) Problem Statement for Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions (SUPA) > draft-bi-supa-problem-statement-00 > Presenter: Jun BI [JB] > JB: This draft has existed for a while; the current version reflects > the changes that have been made to the supa value-proposition draft. >=20 > Nevil: how many read it? - around 10 hands > We want to see the discussion on this go on, in particular we need > more discussion on the IM and DM. More progress on DM would be > very welcome. >=20 > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Nevil Brownlee Computer Science > Department > Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941 The University of Auckland > FAX: +64 9 373 7453 Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Supa mailing list > Supa@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa _______________________________________________ Supa mailing list Supa@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa From nobody Tue May 3 18:13:22 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: supa@ietf.org Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEFB12D960; Tue, 3 May 2016 18:13:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.19.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160504011320.8366.27137.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 18:13:20 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: bclaise@cisco.com, supa-chairs@ietf.org, supa@ietf.org, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Supa] supa - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 96 X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 01:13:20 -0000 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Nevil Brownlee, a Chair of the supa working group. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Nevil Brownlee Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 1.5 Hours Number of Attendees: 75 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: i2nsf l3sm lime netmod netconf opsarea opsawg sdnrg pce Second Priority: rtgarea rtgwg i2rs Special Requests: --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Mon May 23 14:27:21 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: supa@ietf.org Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7393E12D594; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:27:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: , , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.21.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160523212719.20338.46708.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 14:27:19 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Supa] The SUPA WG has placed draft-halpern-supa-generic-policy-data-model in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:27:19 -0000 The SUPA WG has placed draft-halpern-supa-generic-policy-data-model in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Nevil Brownlee) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-halpern-supa-generic-policy-data-model/ From nobody Mon May 23 15:03:52 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF29E12D5B2 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:03:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKO8jQJ-O_FP for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:03:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mh-0-1.lancs.ac.uk (mh-0-1.lancs.ac.uk [148.88.65.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE4212D185 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 15:03:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ex-1-ht0.lancs.ac.uk ([10.42.18.57] helo=EX-1-HT0.lancs.local) by mh-0-1.lancs.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1b4xwv-000CBp-QE; Mon, 23 May 2016 23:03:45 +0100 Received: from EX-0-MB2.lancs.local ([fe80::9d98:936b:54d1:c531]) by EX-1-HT0.lancs.local ([fe80::d9e8:ad10:d075:a6b6%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Mon, 23 May 2016 23:03:45 +0100 From: "King, Daniel" To: "supa@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: WG Adoption of draft-strassner-supa-generic-policy-info-model-05 Thread-Index: AdG1PQiIUwrfA7uOREuzN1e+XTkTcg== Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 22:03:44 +0000 Message-ID: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCE8952@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [86.157.139.122] x-iss-local-domain: 1 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCE8952EX0MB2lancsloca_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: Nevil Brownlee Subject: [Supa] WG Adoption of draft-strassner-supa-generic-policy-info-model-05 X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 22:03:51 -0000 --_000_65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCE8952EX0MB2lancsloca_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear Supa'rs, Following up the poll during the recent SUPA working group session @IETF95,= we would like to start the two week poll for adoption via the working grou= p list for: Generic Policy Information Model for Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions = (SUPA) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-strassner-supa-generic-policy-info-model-= 05 The adoption poll will end on June 6th. Please provide a clear indication o= f your opinion in support or against the document, ideally with some though= t for your decision. The intention is to use this document as a base for addressing the followin= g working group charter milestone: "Submit the generic information model (Informational)" https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/supa/charter/ We intend to follow-up the poll for this information model I-D, with a sepa= rate adoption poll for the data model I-D (draft-halpern-supa-generic-polic= y-data-model) that was also presented @IETF95 in the SUPA working group ses= sion. BR, Dan and Nevil. --_000_65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCE8952EX0MB2lancsloca_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear Supa’rs,

 

Following up the poll during the recent SUPA working= group session @IETF95, we would like to start the two week poll for adopti= on via the working group list for:

 

Generic Policy Information Model for Simplified Use = of Policy Abstractions (SUPA)

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-str= assner-supa-generic-policy-info-model-05

 

The adoption poll will end on June 6th. P= lease provide a clear indication of your opinion in support or against the = document, ideally with some thought for your decision.

 

The intention is to use this document as a base for = addressing the following working group charter milestone:

 

“Submit the generic information model (Informa= tional)”

https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/supa/charter/

 

We intend to follow-up the poll for this information= model I-D, with a separate adoption poll for the data model I-D (draft-hal= pern-supa-generic-policy-data-model) that was also presented @IETF95 in the= SUPA working group session.  

 

BR, Dan and Nevil.

--_000_65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCE8952EX0MB2lancsloca_--