Subject: RE: [Techspec] Cutoff for post-approval corrections

From: "Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:17:11 -0600

Brian Carpenter Wrote
> 
> Basically we need to be sure we keep the equivalent of AUTH48
> where the authors and AD have a final look; but if they ask
> for excessive changes at that stage, which *does* happen,
> the publisher needs to be able to say no. On the other hand we
> need the publisher to stop if someone on the technical side
> finds a major problem at the last moment. Whether that makes
> two requirements or one, I leave to Stephen.
> 
We already have the stop publication requirement in section 3.13.

I'm not really sure whether there is a big disagreement between Brian and Eric on whether the publisher can refuse last minute changes.  The potential responses of "no (too late or too big)" and "yes, but it has to go to the bottom of the queue again" amount to about the same thing in terms of what the publisher can actually enforce.  

_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec