
From stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie  Fri Jun  7 05:04:00 2013
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379FD21F86B2 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  7 Jun 2013 05:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xeSb6CXF9pqE for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri,  7 Jun 2013 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5938D21F89FF for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Fri,  7 Jun 2013 05:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C30BBE87 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Fri,  7 Jun 2013 13:03:28 +0100 (IST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxADr+0vGv8o for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Fri,  7 Jun 2013 13:03:28 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:770:10:203:80ef:4ae:b4e0:a4c4] (unknown [IPv6:2001:770:10:203:80ef:4ae:b4e0:a4c4]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CD4CBE73 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Fri,  7 Jun 2013 13:03:28 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <51B1CC11.60706@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:03:29 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "therightkey@ietf.org" <therightkey@ietf.org>
References: <20130606205725.E4B4DB1E003@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130606205725.E4B4DB1E003@rfc-editor.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20130606205725.E4B4DB1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030505070209060102080902"
Subject: [therightkey] Fwd: RFC 6962 on Certificate Transparency
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 12:04:00 -0000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030505070209060102080902
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


FYI. Well done all. Be interesting to see how this
works out in the wild.

Cheers,
S.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RFC 6962 on Certificate Transparency
Date: Thu,  6 Jun 2013 13:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
CC: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


        RFC 6962

        Title:      Certificate Transparency
        Author:     B. Laurie,
                    A. Langley,
                    E. Kasper
        Status:     Experimental
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       June 2013
        Mailbox:    benl@google.com,
                    agl@google.com,
                    ekasper@google.com
        Pages:      27
        Characters: 55048
        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None

        I-D Tag:    draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-12.txt

        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6962.txt

This document describes an experimental protocol for publicly logging
the existence of Transport Layer Security (TLS) certificates as they
are issued or observed, in a manner that allows anyone to audit
certificate authority (CA) activity and notice the issuance of
suspect certificates as well as to audit the certificate logs
themselves.  The intent is that eventually clients would refuse to
honor certificates that do not appear in a log, effectively forcing
CAs to add all issued certificates to the logs.

Logs are network services that implement the protocol operations for
submissions and queries that are defined in this document.


EXPERIMENTAL: This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the
Internet community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any
kind. Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC






--------------030505070209060102080902
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 name="Attached Message Part"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="Attached Message Part"


--------------030505070209060102080902--
