Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] liaison statement tracker

From: Brian E Carpenter <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:32:20 +0200

Yes, where we have a formal liaison, the other SDO can
nominate one or two people who get a login for the tool.

    Brian

Yaakov Stein wrote:
> Brian, 
> 
> The two liaisons you linked are much better 
> than any of the ones I have seen to date, e.g. 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file163.pdf
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/documents/LIAISON/file169.txt .
> 
> It is not clear to me how the incoming statements were entered
> into the tracker. Does the other SDO enter them directly,
> or is there a shepherd at the IETF ?
> 
> And is it sufficient to enter an outgoing liaison into the system,
> and then rely on the system to send the liaison to the intended
> recipients, 
> or is the entering for tracking only, and email needs to be
> sent separately?
> 
> Y(J)S
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 11:19
> To: Yaakov Stein
> Cc: [email-masked]; Stewart Bryant
> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] liaison statement tracker
> 
> The liaison posting tool does have relevant features I think.
> If you look at recent statements such as
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/liaison_detail.cgi?detail_id=206
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/liaison_detail.cgi?detail_id=199
> you can see who they were cc'ed to.
> 
> This doesn't apply to statements sent the old-fashioned way, by email,
> but that is something to be discouraged.
> 
>     Brian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss