Subject: [Tools-discuss] Idnits-2.04.09 feedback

From: Paul Aitken <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:39:09 +0100

Hi.

I just found a problem with a draft that's just about to become an RFC, 
where it claims RFC 2119 compliance but uses the term "MAY NOT" which is 
not defined in RFC 2119.

This is leading to two different interpretations - one believing MAY NOT 
== MUST NOT, the other believing MAY NOT == SHOULD NOT.

Could idnits be updated to check for such errors?

Thanks.
-- 
Paul Aitken
Cisco Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland.

_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss