Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Errata

From: "Frank Ellermann" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 17:59:26 +0200

Henrik Levkowetz wrote:

>> Hi, the errata are not more in sync with the 
>> reported errata, is that as it should be ?
 
> No, it's not.  Investigating.

Checking the source, RFC-index.xml has an errata-url
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2069
But the IETF Tools sever doesn't show it anymore.

Therefore it is unrelated to the age or status, an
erratum for RFC 2045 erratum is still shown, also
more than 40 months old, also simply "reported".

Maybe something on your side lost the errata-urls,
I add a complete list as of today (667 RFCs) below.

 Frank

~~~ cut ~~~
783
791
792
793
822
854
894
951
959
1001
1002
1033
1034
1035
1036
1042
1071
1122
1123
1158
1180
1195
1275
1279
1319
1321
1322
1340
1413
1517
1531
1534
1535
1542
1661
1662
1685
1712
1724
1725
1771
1810
1812
1867
1891
1894
1915
1918
1925
1927
1936
1939
1959
1979
2015
2021
2026
2028
2030
2040
2045
2046
2047
2060
2069
2092
2104
2119
2126
2127
2131
2132
2142
2152
2157
2183
2184
2192
2196
2202
2213
2231
2234
2236
2241
2244
2250
2252
2254
2268
2277
2281
2286
2288
2307
2308
2324
2327
2328
2347
2361
2362
2373
2392
2395
2396
2407
2417
2421
2426
2445
2453
2459
2462
2464
2486
2489
2492
2516
2518
2527
2544
2548
2557
2576
2579
2581
2595
2597
2616
2617
2625
2630
2631
2633
2645
2655
2656
2661
2663
2676
2679
2681
2731
2732
2737
2740
2759
2763
2764
2786
2810
2812
2813
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2827
2834
2846
2858
2861
2865
2867
2873
2883
2911
2916
2919
2925
2927
2938
2939
2978
2985
2988
3003
3010
3015
3023
3024
3028
3030
3031
3032
3036
3037
3047
3052
3056
3062
3065
3066
3069
3080
3083
3092
3104
3108
3119
3126
3161
3165
3174
3180
3189
3204
3207
3208
3217
3219
3220
3245
3247
3253
3261
3262
3265
3266
3267
3271
3272
3275
3279
3280
3281
3289
3297
3300
3304
3305
3314
3315
3330
3331
3339
3369
3370
3372
3376
3377
3385
3389
3394
3401
3404
3406
3410
3413
3414
3415
3418
3420
3424
3445
3447
3448
3454
3461
3468
3470
3473
3490
3492
3494
3501
3507
3525
3530
3537
3542
3588
3597
3605
3625
3633
3647
3659
3666
3678
3696
3700
3712
3715
3720
3730
3733
3741
3742
3744
3770
3777
3779
3781
3782
3783
3798
3813
3815
3816
3822
3829
3834
3852
3866
3877
3886
3887
3891
3920
3926
3931
3933
3939
3944
3958
3961
3964
3965
3966
3967
3970
3971
3973
3978
3981
3982
3987
4009
4010
4026
4028
4029
4034
4043
4048
4051
4052
4057
4060
4073
4102
4103
4113
4114
4117
4119
4122
4133
4140
4141
4143
4147
4151
4156
4157
4171
4173
4181
4182
4186
4187
4188
4204
4207
4211
4217
4226
4227
4229
4230
4234
4235
4237
4238
4240
4241
4253
4255
4256
4268
4270
4271
4274
4275
4277
4280
4282
4283
4285
4286
4288
4291
4293
4294
4295
4296
4301
4302
4303
4305
4307
4308
4309
4312
4314
4319
4322
4326
4327
4334
4335
4337
4339
4340
4342
4343
4345
4346
4347
4352
4360
4364
4365
4366
4367
4377
4379
4380
4384
4386
4388
4389
4396
4397
4404
4407
4408
4409
4410
4425
4427
4428
4430
4433
4436
4438
4439
4443
4444
4446
4447
4448
4449
4450
4455
4458
4468
4470
4474
4479
4480
4483
4501
4502
4506
4511
4512
4514
4515
4516
4518
4519
4521
4524
4526
4529
4532
4534
4541
4543
4544
4545
4550
4553
4557
4566
4567
4570
4571
4577
4583
4584
4585
4586
4587
4588
4590
4591
4592
4595
4596
4601
4606
4607
4612
4619
4623
4627
4631
4632
4634
4636
4640
4641
4646
4650
4660
4661
4664
4668
4669
4670
4671
4672
4673
4675
4676
4677
4678
4679
4683
4684
4695
4698
4701
4705
4717
4721
4728
4730
4733
4741
4742
4745
4746
4747
4753
4757
4758
4763
4778
4779
4782
4783
4790
4791
4795
4804
4812
4820
4821
4823
4824
4828
4842
4851
4852
4853
4856
4861
4863
4866
4871
4872
4873
4875
4876
4877
4884
4885
4886
4888
4889
4895
4905
4906
4907
4909
4918
4919
4920
4928
4935
4938
4939
4940
4941
4948
4954
4956
4957
4958
4960
4966
4968
4975
4976
4978
4982
4985
4991
4992
4993
4995
4996
5002
5008
5012
5022
5023
5031
5035
5044
5052
5058
5059
5060
5063
5065
5075
5087
5088
5089
5090
5092
5098
5102
5106
5109
5115
5117
5118
5119
5123
5128
5134
5135
5140
5144
5150
5151
5158
5162
5169
5176
5185
5187
5198
5216
5225
5233
5234
5239
5240
~~~ end ~~~

_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

---

From: "Frank Ellermann" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:03:17 +0200

Hi, something with the IETF Tools list doesn't work.

GMaNe used to be subscribed as [email-masked],
and that worked at least until 2008-07-08:
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.tools/1109/raw>

GMaNe identified this mail injected via GMaNe as spam.
That's kind of odd, if it's really spam, why forward
it to the list ?  The score says:

| X-Spam-Report: 5.5 points;
| * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
| * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
| *  2.5 UNIQUE_WORDS BODY: Message body has many words used only once
| *  0.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE RBL: Envelope sender in abuse.rfc-ignorant.org
| *  1.4 DNS_FROM_RFC_POST RBL: Envelope sender in postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org
| *  1.2 PRIORITY_NO_NAME Message has priority, but no X-Mailer/User-Agent
 
Unfortunately the IETF is listed as postmaster and
abuse ignorant since 2008-02-22, I didn't know that.

That my UA has no X-Mailer/User-Agent is IMO a bogey:

When posting via GMaNe the UA is a "Newsreader", and
it has a X-Newsreader, as "specified" in the NetNews
RFC (actually as "deprecated", and this RFC is still
waiting for its number, but that's another story. :-)

I've reported this "spam" as "unspam" while checking
something else:

Today the IETF Tools list "challenged" a new article
posted via GMaNe.  And *apparently* GMane used a new
address [email-masked] (note the "m"):

<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.tools/1114/raw>
<http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.tools/1115/raw>

Seeing the "challenge" I sent the "response" (1115)
directly (via GMail, not via GMaNe), but apparently
that didn't work, the original article is still lost
in space.

What is going on here, did GMaNe change its address
unilaterally ?  Why does the IETF C/R system not do
whatever it is trying to do ?  The RFC-I listings
are apparently an effect of a temporary glitch back
in February, I'll try to fix that.

 Frank
-- 
Reposted bypassing GMaNe.  RFC-I issue reported:
removal links sent to abuse@ and postmaster@ietf
_______________________________________________
Tools-discuss mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss

---

From: Henrik Levkowetz <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:31:51 +0100

Hi Frank,

On 2008-07-08 16:59 Frank Ellermann said the following:

...
> I add a complete list as of today (667 RFCs) below.
...

I believe I've fixed the problem on the tools servers,
and errata annotations should be correct again.  If you
notice any http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfcXXXX which doesn't
have an Errata link, but should have, please let me know.

Best,

	Henrik

---

From: "Frank Ellermann" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:43:08 +0200

Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
 
> I believe I've fixed the problem on the tools servers

Thanks.  Random test, 2069, works.  

Unrelated, the day before yesterday I noted that a draft
in IETF Last Call has no "tracker" link:

<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject>

>From the times before the Tools Server took over I still
had a tracker search form, and found this beast:

<https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject/>

Last Calls at the same time as an IETF meeting time tend
to be about the more contro^Winteresting drafts... <gd&r>

 Frank