Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] nit comment

From: Henrik Levkowetz <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:55:00 +0200

Hi Martin, Leif,

Thanks for reporting this.  This is fixed in v1.98 of rfcmarkup, and
the html version of the draft should be corrected shortly.

Best regards,

	Henrik

On 2011-06-01 08:09 "Martin J. Dürst" said:
> Hello Leif,
> 
> There is indeed a missing link to Section 4.1 in the text version. In 
> the XML source, these links are there (and the text "Section 4.1" is 
> autogenerated.
> 
> What you see is an artefact of how tool.ietf.org reconstructs links from 
> the plain text version (). I have cc'ed [email-masked] in the 
> hope somebody can look at this issue.
> 
> Regards,   Martin.
> 
> On 2011/06/01 8:45, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> Sorry if this has been adrressed or there is a reason for it, but in
>> Section 3.7
>>
>>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-05#section-3.7
>>
>> then, on the words "Section 4.1", ther should be a link to section 4.1.
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>