From sergeilissianoi@gmail.com Wed Feb 9 20:33:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4FD3A6856 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:33:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.527 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.527 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM=2.072] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EOXWDmDIo2hR for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f194.google.com (mail-iw0-f194.google.com [209.85.214.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD403A67F7 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by iwb12 with SMTP id 12so373574iwb.1 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:33:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=n3EjDCnNa6GqfoNZgvzDaS4jIDrOqFQ++IiAfnUNSFY=; b=jJIgnLUeO8wzaKHUkBougkNLzqHxbWjEA2lcsSMfXtOksQZ2l52s4btWCy3RP/yLUO ++KrKk+EENMBqzhpcKnXRaAAAxFwN5zkKrBmf1nopkWrOExL790OAnSPdF8jIAdUt2qB oBgwd5111FWgEy2L8ggYD7NnK8X/MgZ+tLU+g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=u3/zlpkeyJElEkbaT/3A30puzWQR24gH5w+AJnHPxZVt/h53Vs7gR9RgBqaXMRV7lL tge0Ip2HfENrBafpekNdJ1w0vbKiZNtbU+vrxe9f+AhzvInr1plG+eoeX4YNnn1dIiB/ 4ZaLbciuyGQXEwahoU8DmxGMJdO+C1H73LyvM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.177.137 with SMTP id bi9mr22922799icb.194.1297312428258; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:33:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.178.3 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2011 20:33:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 23:33:48 -0500 Message-ID: From: Sergei Lissianoi To: vrrp@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 04:34:56 -0000 Avaya Ethernet Routing Switch 8800 supports VRRP for IPv4 and IPv6. No support for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt though. -- Sergei >Subject: What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? >From: Radia Perlman >Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:52:20 -0800 > Are there implementations of unified VRRP, and MIB? > > (This is for the shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt, > but it would also be good to know). > > Who has implementations of unified VRRP? > > Thanks, > > Radia From vinothkumar.arumugam@gmail.com Thu Feb 10 08:05:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B753A6A1E for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 51AZuBrYzofE for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pz0-f66.google.com (mail-pz0-f66.google.com [209.85.210.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143133A69FC for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by pzk36 with SMTP id 36so206413pzk.1 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=zDOvqsTToS8qyhU4QbEpKHsCz/iWn2Knj7/yADTupCI=; b=gSq2dV/fltPehq3LG9khYGV3GNd1MJu1O4cUrpenhGTnt9bYADRuyDVLPKmb9ndGzX wE8qREC917+Qu3pLkQwZ8RJ1dsGDbPItF5MV1yCxkOl349T/9GMfrhyh7WLxEvZ0xowZ o0uE+nvVqHmJkKJjCcXmmy8iJ+hjGyxiBqHFk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=BBm6Hq6wLGx5gvT1unbYH+35xb7++5ijeCK5WvXHeJgydJRB/9UJa/JhJIouNgXerj ErxADM62IM0sAWET/yGVwznj6a1tiEwXDO5XdxvY14j2MrvVSg9hOSP7Q2FRaMpTov7o ODWUHlAVMySELqgcPYL+q2LT+OA0OXUhJBo7U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.242.21 with SMTP id p21mr548161wfh.26.1297353915317; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.165.8 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:05:15 -0800 Message-ID: From: Vinoth Kumar Arumugam To: Sergei Lissianoi , vrrp@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:05:04 -0000 Hi, Force10 has vrrp IPV6. On 2/9/11, Sergei Lissianoi wrote: > Avaya Ethernet Routing Switch 8800 supports VRRP for IPv4 and IPv6. No > support for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt though. > > -- Sergei > >>Subject: What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? >>From: Radia Perlman >>Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:52:20 -0800 > >> Are there implementations of unified VRRP, and MIB? >> >> (This is for the shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt, >> but it would also be good to know). >> >> Who has implementations of unified VRRP? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Radia > _______________________________________________ > vrrp mailing list > vrrp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp > -- Sent from my mobile device Thanks Vinoth Kumar Arumugam. Force10 Networks India Pvt LTD email - varumugam@force10networks.com From mukesh@juniper.net Fri Feb 11 19:21:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11B83A6A94 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:21:28 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mICtP9uaFXoG for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:21:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod7og125.obsmtp.com (exprod7og125.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5010D3A6A92 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:21:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob125.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTVX8xtDsRrtSQqlL2whxbHWg90QAdKCp@postini.com; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:21:44 PST Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:16:53 -0800 From: Mukesh Gupta To: Vinoth Kumar Arumugam , Sergei Lissianoi , "vrrp@ietf.org" Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:16:51 -0800 Thread-Topic: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? Thread-Index: AcvJPFJNOS13iW0vTSSmhzafvCKzhABD5ksw Message-ID: <497B6D90E0023142AF34948DEFFAB38D3B4898AF5C@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> References:

In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 03:21:29 -0000 Hi, Do you know which version of the VRRPv3 has been implemented on the Force10= ? Regards Mukesh -----Original Message----- From: vrrp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vrrp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vin= oth Kumar Arumugam Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:05 AM To: Sergei Lissianoi; vrrp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? Hi, Force10 has vrrp IPV6. On 2/9/11, Sergei Lissianoi wrote: > Avaya Ethernet Routing Switch 8800 supports VRRP for IPv4 and IPv6. No > support for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt though. > > -- Sergei > >>Subject: What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? >>From: Radia Perlman >>Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:52:20 -0800 > >> Are there implementations of unified VRRP, and MIB? >> >> (This is for the shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt= , >> but it would also be good to know). >> >> Who has implementations of unified VRRP? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Radia > _______________________________________________ > vrrp mailing list > vrrp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp > --=20 Sent from my mobile device Thanks Vinoth Kumar Arumugam. Force10 Networks India Pvt LTD email - varumugam@force10networks.com _______________________________________________ vrrp mailing list vrrp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp From vinothkumar.arumugam@gmail.com Tue Feb 15 18:59:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: vrrp@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D523A6C2D for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:59:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qIntZ4uFCnZN for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:59:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-px0-f194.google.com (mail-px0-f194.google.com [209.85.212.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B573A6B77 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:59:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by pxi13 with SMTP id 13so72281pxi.1 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:59:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9omzmtHbKA2yPH28OmZ6wm5mI/XG+8dt1aqnGGWkSLk=; b=AYOky3GgOjl7uenmqqNahiHUOyI5lBcYNUFJgXnxUqq2dEOKH0Ms4F0dF5h9ul7iwY nGczk2KMa5aLfugUdeLNVIOsYTgvEtzpU/G0ga1qFtkF5tn3ThiKSsTfp7kYutp0+dOv VejJ9YaIrDX+5q4F9pmPw+zMTnldvGanfa7so= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=aLGPruUmxu7VDXWAaAyNdTTA69wfRxclOe4lishQayrqck7RQmFliCtpBassQh6bdT wGWt5okFJZm36+MCXhkZD9heTrO0UX5Eq/8TL/bet5b4zTJPqn0WNnp8a/tvC02fUCPP ile1ca3vlTueUCJsYX/ZM6kAc6HlQxYYOhOrQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.133.6 with SMTP id g6mr13015wfd.311.1297825175153; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:59:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.165.8 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:59:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <497B6D90E0023142AF34948DEFFAB38D3B4898AF5C@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> References:

<497B6D90E0023142AF34948DEFFAB38D3B4898AF5C@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:59:35 -0800 Message-ID: From: Vinoth Kumar Arumugam To: Mukesh Gupta , Sergei Lissianoi , "vrrp@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? X-BeenThere: vrrp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 02:59:09 -0000 Hi, Its draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec for IPV6. On 2/11/11, Mukesh Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > Do you know which version of the VRRPv3 has been implemented on the Force10? > > Regards > Mukesh > > -----Original Message----- > From: vrrp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:vrrp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Vinoth Kumar Arumugam > Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 8:05 AM > To: Sergei Lissianoi; vrrp@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [VRRP] What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? > > Hi, > > Force10 has vrrp IPV6. > > On 2/9/11, Sergei Lissianoi wrote: >> Avaya Ethernet Routing Switch 8800 supports VRRP for IPv4 and IPv6. No >> support for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt though. >> >> -- Sergei >> >>>Subject: What implementations exist of VRRP unified, and of MIB? >>>From: Radia Perlman >>>Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:52:20 -0800 >> >>> Are there implementations of unified VRRP, and MIB? >>> >>> (This is for the shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-mib-08.txt, >>> but it would also be good to know). >>> >>> Who has implementations of unified VRRP? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Radia >> _______________________________________________ >> vrrp mailing list >> vrrp@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp >> > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > Thanks > Vinoth Kumar Arumugam. > Force10 Networks India Pvt LTD > email - varumugam@force10networks.com > _______________________________________________ > vrrp mailing list > vrrp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrrp > -- Sent from my mobile device Thanks Vinoth Kumar Arumugam. Force10 Networks India Pvt LTD email - varumugam@force10networks.com