Subject: Re: [websec] Pre-loaded pins vs dynamic pins

From: Chris Palmer <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:12:42 -0700

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Tobias Gondrom
<[email-masked]> wrote:

>>>> Does anyone (and that includes the authors) object to relaxing the requirements in section 2.7, so that the choice of when the static pins are believed to have been observed is left to the implementer?  If not, we'll resolve it that way.
>>> I don't object; I like that well enough.
>> Seconded/Thirded/Fourthed
>
> <no hat>
> I agree. Thirded

Done: https://code.google.com/p/key-pinning-draft/source/detail?r=261a8e2adc98156ef9c2016ffbe7af27c777dff6