From nobody Wed Apr 1 07:40:41 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316803A1068 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 07:40:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -17.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVfE3lgg96gT for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 07:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 642753A1067 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 07:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id i19so7539657wmb.0 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 07:40:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Zhe1lesQcjMvG4KvH7+Aru1tiwOEWZhujHr39evjfZI=; b=jeP0+Rwh53ZO8s/3j/xWaF+oZb25KeH6wdnO/m6rFHfJqdCs3llCstfgjkak7e5cYc PTwLkgKC+DnPXX9O8zKf51WSsAUEsJUo/GGiYFIUcWK3jZI1YsjJCqi2ENgXxht9LNeM oi09LNr/1D3zCdWpav9EBe+LKKfWdscGro5PrBIFNg3rfqbRtvprZ8qKNFJclBJNyQTr 9aSe91maGQ+Dt9BbuGCWrpjbbORBbqX5RIZE/mtzjAZ3spGdS1WpqOsd4AE9qWUPL7DD RDpdEPBNlWwXJAi/AGsH01l4YCJb2zstDfch0mQ55WbhfaREYIm8pvZcHYgML9SuMEJF 80GQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Zhe1lesQcjMvG4KvH7+Aru1tiwOEWZhujHr39evjfZI=; b=hex4H1ZibDy3kBCp1nyAjCrfAOfOzYXFL1/ZVrnLZX2tEMeCaoMouSH/MPB5D5Zlut nYjisOBVo3QFm6eMJfRHVDy6D0n/5MKu6+rRIgCMSpeo8XP9hZV9q0ODN4bLU3YDgjWO BaD3sBRxFgeKWIRrYoelEsQfbOUwuGSLWpN5ZsTFPLg3zU9d8IbIJhbpUgNpOG1BPLCc NLpGMol1ZqPht+ZCTJwx2GLvNrrmp44YwPb+JsQ2blCzRYfU3wMUzmcmIbI+wwCoFFui yxBOiXz6i9kb+1vqhDAcAxAGnR+s7rHdu8/ceIIc7Zg0CeppoMPmWLvx78bvpwdwTDtC VsRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYsUgqrBO9ZZj9AL7ph82igZMubd85kWdQDLxsP8PSHVK2NnW38 /GmMgFuT1OQZOEU57yw8eA1dHVJQuDRgIH6+0Negmg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKEtHgz0PuTOIyJbRXGghspAMoUwRywJw/VPgECxYTs2la4xhUyyvMLTHcQBSOYEo4nAHxl1Hh5hWnCWvR1yXM= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cde8:: with SMTP id p8mr4631710wmj.87.1585752035545; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 07:40:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8F15A5C3-9425-452E-AB2C-8B8CE3F646F0@apple.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ian Swett Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:40:23 -0400 Message-ID: To: Bernard Aboba Cc: webtransport@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c82fa705a23baa40" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Call for adoption: draft-vvv-webtransport-overview X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:40:39 -0000 --000000000000c82fa705a23baa40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I also support adoption. On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:03 PM Bernard Aboba wrote: > I also support adoption. > > Hi WebTransport enthusiasts, > > As discussed in our meeting at IETF 107 last week, > this email starts a two-week WEBTRANS Working Group > adoption call for draft-vvv-webtransport-overview. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vvv-webtransport-overview/ > > The adoption call will run until 2020-04-14. Please send comments, > statements of support, and/or objections to . > > I'll note that WG adoption does not mean that the document has WG > consensus yet, it just means that we think that Victor's individual draft > is a good basis for us to start a new WG draft. > > As a reminder, an overview document is discussed in our charter: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/webtrans/about/ > To assist in the coordination with owners of the WebTransport API, the > group will initially develop an overview document containing use cases > and requirements in order to clarify the goals of the effort. > > Thanks, > David and Bernard > -- > Webtransport mailing list > Webtransport@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport > > -- > Webtransport mailing list > Webtransport@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport > > -- > Webtransport mailing list > Webtransport@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport > --000000000000c82fa705a23baa40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I also support adoption.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:03 PM B= ernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@g= mail.com> wrote:
I also support adoption.=C2=A0

<= blockquote type=3D"cite">
Hi WebTransport = enthusiasts,

As discussed in our meeting at IETF 107 las= t week,
this email starts a two-week WEBTRANS Working Group
=
adoption call for=C2=A0draft-vvv-webtransport-overview.

The adoption call will run until 2= 020-04-14. Please send comments,
statements of support, and/or ob= jections to=C2=A0<webtransport@ietf.org>.

I'll note = that WG adoption does not mean that the document has WG
consensus= yet, it just means that we think that Victor's individual draft
<= div>is a good basis for us to start a new WG draft.

As a reminder, an overview document is discussed in our charter:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/webtrans/about/
=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 To assist in the coordination with owners of the WebTransport AP= I, the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 group will initially develop an overview document c= ontaining use cases
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 and requirements in order to clarify t= he goals of the effort.

Thanks,
Davi= d and Bernard
--
Webtransport mailing list
Webtransport@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport=
--
Webtransport ma= iling list
Webtransport@ietf.org
https://www.iet= f.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport
= --
Webtransport mailing list
Webtransport@iet= f.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport=
--000000000000c82fa705a23baa40-- From nobody Wed Apr 15 13:49:38 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webtransport@ietf.org Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0583A003D; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:49:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Secretariat To: , , X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.127.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <158698377488.12724.11659315956297184797@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:49:35 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Webtransport] The WEBTRANS WG has placed draft-vvv-webtransport-overview in state "Adopted by a WG" X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:49:36 -0000 The WEBTRANS WG has placed draft-vvv-webtransport-overview in state Adopted by a WG (entered by David Schinazi) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vvv-webtransport-overview/ Comment: Adoption call happened on from 2020-03-31 to 2020-04-14, received statements of support and no objections. From nobody Wed Apr 15 13:50:10 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82EE3A040C for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:50:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n9AoDzyyhoZG for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A12E3A0528 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id u15so5339875ljd.3 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:50:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=44swMNbNf6x9AdPOYo2NvH9ro/oMohRakKZa1Havphs=; b=smNIYXKq1q9EzGWkJjLT7g6gTb142yT9Z+jtigtUnKCAtr5JWjx2G/Kz0DnyWIzKVU qzDoqE0U19Aw0knCKlLwzjyCTomrx2vchdSobk1v7Ze6B1N4TmSEkgksEroY5Wdoq7sB BGjTqQNLz+Dnh1kdTXQ7lTvSGq1AIvJLXyc+sfyBKlUlo8Fra3AfU4IauvWjS5w/4TaD E/9YR4wx41J5JmqdT0xajC/0SEF+Ba9LhflVW/YlITijQGiLFdydwKoc3ltoo3cNhPUD A2/23GegGzVk5nl/BoonZ9FDNqg43cNzQq1kM4RRUMzEsNPSfeMil9CF89H+NSIdbuZN C6Aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=44swMNbNf6x9AdPOYo2NvH9ro/oMohRakKZa1Havphs=; b=QnluC38caful/eZfWwycK95q+wC0xTe0osrA9VybxGbXqRFoAbecdZdo4fqI4mliXv lvOO7i1WsosTLtETQpsqkkD785YyXe0wsOzqxtKvkTxK55y+YKerB/Mo+7xR6JFkMx3X ZMBqOSJkYby1kabAHPEModYosW6OfPFzVvrb9GsYDZ3nqr4NUeV3gc+fElVfD86Imir/ HRzrzOeJZrQ0p2P9ZnliqOgkDt4NOsAcwSi3DIC4irBtV3wcQUefQtSkd7mZzmjvVGim 2c9f/EnoL5blbr+3aLA95Bf26rwA/FWLoRt5W7tarzjSzbEM2SahChNoJt4+eDdgOQI3 cIEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubKKkhrTW26SnxsgRTnKehNXZZhDjmEkN+liXtXuk+wy/HM3+8O 0rLlh/2sJM0MZLIMlKbkt9BDYOX80+X5Fbu3O/vCWcPo X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypK7vpN7OvaNlQSvKeRZ9uV+yxUIqQvUnnpc1THnpNX7fIsFU0+7kXK/VOx0wso6J8xtA3R2+gIhjTouLDH81S4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9616:: with SMTP id v22mr4183596ljh.107.1586983800353; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:50:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Schinazi Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:49:49 -0700 Message-ID: To: WebTransport Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000af376a05a35a75ad" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Call for adoption: draft-vvv-webtransport-overview X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:50:08 -0000 --000000000000af376a05a35a75ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi everyone, The chairs have received multiple indications of support and no objections, therefore we declare draft-vvv-webtransport-overview officially adopted by the WEBTRANS WG. Victor, please submit draft-ietf-webtrans-overview-00 as an exact copy of draft-vvv-webtransport-overview-01. There will be a subsequent announcement about where this lands on GitHub, so folks can file issues. Thanks, David On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:00 PM David Schinazi wrote: > Hi WebTransport enthusiasts, > > As discussed in our meeting at IETF 107 last week, > this email starts a two-week WEBTRANS Working Group > adoption call for draft-vvv-webtransport-overview. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vvv-webtransport-overview/ > > The adoption call will run until 2020-04-14. Please send comments, > statements of support, and/or objections to . > > I'll note that WG adoption does not mean that the document has WG > consensus yet, it just means that we think that Victor's individual draft > is a good basis for us to start a new WG draft. > > As a reminder, an overview document is discussed in our charter: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/webtrans/about/ > To assist in the coordination with owners of the WebTransport API, the > group will initially develop an overview document containing use cases > and requirements in order to clarify the goals of the effort. > > Thanks, > David and Bernard > --000000000000af376a05a35a75ad Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi everyone,

The chair= s have received multiple indications of support and no objections,
therefore we declare=C2=A0draft-vvv-webtransport-overview=C2=A0officially= =C2=A0adopted=C2=A0by
the WEBTRANS WG.

V= ictor, please submit draft-ietf-webtrans-overview-00 as an exact copy of
draft-vvv-webtransport-overview-01. There will be a subsequent
announcement about where this lands on GitHub, so folks can file issu= es.

Thanks,
David


On= Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:00 PM David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi WebTransport = enthusiasts,

As discussed in our meeting at IETF 107 las= t week,
this email starts a two-week WEBTRANS Working Group
=
adoption call for=C2=A0draft-vvv-webtransport-overview.

The adoption call will run until 2= 020-04-14. Please send comments,
statements of support, and/or ob= jections to=C2=A0<webtransport@ietf.org>.

I'll note = that WG adoption does not mean that the document has WG
consensus= yet, it just means that we think that Victor's individual draft
<= div>is a good basis for us to start a new WG draft.

As a reminder, an overview document is discussed in our charter:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/webtrans/about/
=C2= =A0 =C2=A0 To assist in the coordination with owners of the WebTransport AP= I, the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 group will initially develop an overview document c= ontaining use cases
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 and requirements in order to clarify t= he goals of the effort.

Thanks,
Davi= d and Bernard
--000000000000af376a05a35a75ad-- From nobody Fri Apr 17 23:50:05 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webtransport@ietf.org Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691783A1137; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 23:49:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Cc: webtransport@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.127.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Reply-To: webtransport@ietf.org Message-ID: <158719258435.3041.9700551147111154956@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 23:49:44 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Webtransport] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webtrans-overview-00.txt X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 06:49:45 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the WebTransport WG of the IETF. Title : The WebTransport Protocol Framework Author : Victor Vasiliev Filename : draft-ietf-webtrans-overview-00.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2020-04-17 Abstract: The WebTransport Protocol Framework enables clients constrained by the Web security model to communicate with a remote server using a secure multiplexed transport. It consists of a set of individual protocols that are safe to expose to untrusted applications, combined with a model that allows them to be used interchangeably. This document defines the overall requirements on the protocols used in WebTransport, as well as the common features of the protocols, support for some of which may be optional. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-webtrans-overview/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webtrans-overview-00 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-webtrans-overview-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sat Apr 18 11:51:30 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AC13A1134 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:51:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xQuIXJR1sv0a for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFF423A112E for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id h6so4603845lfc.0 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jEonqsgMlQFBMkx8iUhsIblE5tgwm5d0yltbuReDDWs=; b=iEfoaThfRQVhPErTiUJPKy1DCsAiAzqA2bnhld4W5uQn0Rl1RekysCHZrY+cJkqAKU pMm7GOQPxoGy+TeJit+5TwFnYDXSKgKnlj8zbk3QQvU9ya19fVlkzV3KTea/zNyqPItb tMa7dqDX+hGVKLi+3vFz+iFjyLs2pIIwI6jAwP0LKaPG0wLolZcSe4kh1jdi1+Nby/vE wxO8dcWrhi7BzwublQNcI6NNRgVgBVXl6tLLNCUz1uEcHfnhHN3It+7mumgSb4ZyU5Vh +p4vOk+xv4yE0dE2I7X/rigfwFiSSV0LKqldberNOwnJNxMYSA6tGdEg/UwOiQ+XcJ4y NzIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=jEonqsgMlQFBMkx8iUhsIblE5tgwm5d0yltbuReDDWs=; b=MMhrVqibRzmRjg4tx1feD1MoOPy8vxwokYiVAuX0Pd1Ef2SqnfJpIgifHK32zMwAn3 3yymjiB4SE6Yd6KOiUJKmxZq6sE8XHeeI5G1AWn2XlRh4MQOorV67sO2I5YhKfxy/B9M zgbhiYWjANxnwOFugSGj1ojVOO/tF9PFT/v7WK8SpusdyHd2x4A9uNZlHmah/uXEDTyD Ni3wfOhHkcLWcQseWVqd9qiyH+jQ3Ekfl8B5KnKbkERXvhdE9uS94ezhz/Zm0JV4GOAp zX2jiFl0JkYNURBbRuit4Fnmw8diF7bBPqEx5F0fAWJ6Q+wlv2BgrmMdU6OLoqZ8Ui7/ cxyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubqzOiC4zoISELAM07vT6LyQd75VKjIdFVp10WtR1jVjFuGGBCf X/Q52KcmtuA0rW3dFsbSUwOxnyK01HpFr8mnsgOj3EK/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJr24dv32wduMi5hf06xvmRB6APycVUz6BobFpHxc3sri3abjZSUctaD+qBnMfVeO+bch7uiLbG5/HObcSxaXw= X-Received: by 2002:a19:cb41:: with SMTP id b62mr5641816lfg.21.1587235880863; Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Schinazi Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 11:51:10 -0700 Message-ID: To: WebTransport Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da8b5f05a395264f" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Call for adoption: draft-vvv-webtransport-overview X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 18:51:29 -0000 --000000000000da8b5f05a395264f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi everyone, The document has now been adopted and submitted as draft-ietf-webtrans-overview-00, thanks Victor! We'll be using GitHub to facilitate discussion, so we encourage folks to read the adopted draft: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webtrans-overview and please create issues and/or pull requests on the repository here: https://github.com/ietf-wg-webtrans/draft-ietf-webtrans-overview Thanks! David On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 1:49 PM David Schinazi wrote: > Hi everyone, > > The chairs have received multiple indications of support and no objections, > therefore we declare draft-vvv-webtransport-overview officially adopted by > the WEBTRANS WG. > > Victor, please submit draft-ietf-webtrans-overview-00 as an exact copy of > draft-vvv-webtransport-overview-01. There will be a subsequent > announcement about where this lands on GitHub, so folks can file issues. > > Thanks, > David > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:00 PM David Schinazi > wrote: > >> Hi WebTransport enthusiasts, >> >> As discussed in our meeting at IETF 107 last week, >> this email starts a two-week WEBTRANS Working Group >> adoption call for draft-vvv-webtransport-overview. >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vvv-webtransport-overview/ >> >> The adoption call will run until 2020-04-14. Please send comments, >> statements of support, and/or objections to . >> >> I'll note that WG adoption does not mean that the document has WG >> consensus yet, it just means that we think that Victor's individual draft >> is a good basis for us to start a new WG draft. >> >> As a reminder, an overview document is discussed in our charter: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/webtrans/about/ >> To assist in the coordination with owners of the WebTransport API, the >> group will initially develop an overview document containing use cases >> and requirements in order to clarify the goals of the effort. >> >> Thanks, >> David and Bernard >> > --000000000000da8b5f05a395264f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi everyone,

The document has now been = adopted and submitted=C2=A0as
draft-ietf-webtrans-overview-00, th= anks Victor!

We'll be using GitHub to facilita= te discussion, so we encourage folks
and please create issues and/or pull requests on the repo= sitory here:

Thanks!
David

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 1:49 PM David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,

The chairs have received multiple indi= cations of support and no objections,
therefore we declare=C2=A0d= raft-vvv-webtransport-overview=C2=A0officially=C2=A0adopted=C2=A0by
the WEBTRANS WG.

Victor, please submit draft-ie= tf-webtrans-overview-00 as an exact copy of
draft-vvv-webtranspor= t-overview-01. There will be a subsequent
announcement about wher= e this lands on GitHub, so folks can file issues.

= Thanks,
David


On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:00 PM= David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi WebTransport enthusias= ts,

As discussed in our meeting at IETF 107 last week,
this email starts a two-week WEBTRANS Working Group
adop= tion call for=C2=A0draft-vvv-webtransport-overview.


I'll note that WG a= doption does not mean that the document has WG
consensus yet, it = just means that we think that Victor's individual draft
is a = good basis for us to start a new WG draft.

As a re= minder, an overview document is discussed in our charter:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0= To assist in the coordination with owners of the WebTransport API, the
= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 group will initially develop an overview document containing = use cases
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 and requirements in order to clarify the goals o= f the effort.

Thanks,
David and Bern= ard
--000000000000da8b5f05a395264f--