Subject: Re: [wpkops] Scope

From: =JeffH <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:16:51 -0700

> But this group intends to
 > list observations about implementations, along with hand-waving
 > percentages... with no information about what implementation we're
 > talking about?

I don't think that that is what Tim was proposing.

As AdamL noted, there's various "workarounds" (aka "techniques" as Tim termed 
them) embedded in various places (user agents and/or servers and/or CA systems 
and/or certs).

Tim, IIUC, is proposing that to spend time documenting a workaround/technique it 
should be used in at least some baseline number of overall web connections (as a 
way to attempt to trim the "long tail" of workarounds/techniques and software 
versions to document).

(whose data is used, and the availability thereof, are of course good questions)

=JeffH