Subject: [xml2rfc] "can't find package xml 1.8"
From: [email-masked] (Marshall T. Rose)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:36:44 -0800

> When attempting to run xml2rfc.tcl, I receive the following error message:
>
>   Error in startup script: can't find package xml 1.8
>       while executing
>   "package require xml 1.8"
>       (file "./xml2rfc.tcl" line 13)
>
> I am running Debian unstable and when I type 'locate libxml' I see (among
> others) the following output line:
>
>   /usr/lib/libxml.so.1.8.16
>
> Is libxml the required package "xml 1.8" or is the latter something else
> entirely?

it's something else entirely. in the installation instructions, it talks
about installing a couple of supplied libraries into the tcl library area...

/mtr

From: [email-masked] (Peter Saint-Andre)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 11:36:23 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [xml2rfc] "can't find package xml 1.8"
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

When attempting to run xml2rfc.tcl, I receive the following error message:

  Error in startup script: can't find package xml 1.8
      while executing
  "package require xml 1.8"
      (file "./xml2rfc.tcl" line 13)

I am running Debian unstable and when I type 'locate libxml' I see (among
others) the following output line:

  /usr/lib/libxml.so.1.8.16

Is libxml the required package "xml 1.8" or is the latter something else
entirely?

Thanks!

Peter

--
Peter Saint-Andre
email+jabber: [email-masked]

From: [email-masked] (Julian Reschke)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:46:25 +0100
Subject: [xml2rfc] XML to NROFF (ms) via XSLT
In-Reply-To: <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

Hi,

I have an experimental version of an XSLT stylesheet for converting from
RFC2629 format to NROFF (ms) ready.

It's not complete, but it seems to work fine with my current drafts.
Interested parties (preferably with NROFF background) please email me for a
test copy.

Julian

From: [email-masked] (James M Galvin)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:47:51 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [xml2rfc] RFC references with handy converter
In-Reply-To: <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

Thanks to Marshall who noted there was an error in my XML.  It didn't
stand out because the diagnostic from the converter reported the result
of the error as opposed to the error itself.  All has been fixed.

Jim

From: [email-masked] (Graham Klyne)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:53:02 +0000
Subject: [xml2rfc] RFC references with handy converter
In-Reply-To: <[email-masked]>
References: <05f501c1a45f$cf2f3370$0301000a@FATORA>
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

--=====================_17211280==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 06:39 PM 1/23/02 -0500, James M Galvin wrote:
>My message was obviously not clear.  I have populated <references> with
>the appropriate includes in the form:
>
>     <?rfc include="references.RFC.####" ?>
>
>However, whenever I used <xref target="RFC####"> (substituting for ####)
>I get an error from the handy converter claiming that there needs to be
>an element with the name "RFC####".
>
>If I explicitly include the text of the "<reference>" instead of the
>include then there is no issue.
>
>This suggests to me one of the following three things could be wrong:
>
>1. there is an XMLism I don't know and am not using
>2. the anchor is not "RFC####" and thus my target reference is wrong
>3. there is a bug in the xml2rfc converter
>
>Suggestions?

Could this be a need for an xml2rfc.rc file?  Here's mine:

    global env

    if {![info exists env(XML_LIBRARY)]} {
        set env(XML_LIBRARY) \
            ";F:\\xml2rfc\\include;F:\\xml2rfc\\bibxml"
    }
    set nativeD [file nativename $inputD]
    if {[lsearch [split $env(XML_LIBRARY) ";"] $nativeD] < 0} {
        set env(XML_LIBRARY) "$nativeD;$env(XML_LIBRARY)"
    }

Adjust the line containing 'bibxml' to match your system.

The original RFC2XML uses a different name for this file, starting with "." 
(.xml2rfc.rc?).
My system wouldn't allow this (running on Windows 98) so I hacked the 
filename in the source code (two places).

#g

------------
Graham Klyne
[email-masked]

--=====================_17211280==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="xml2rfc.rc"

   global env

   if {![info exists env(XML_LIBRARY)]} {
       set env(XML_LIBRARY) \
           ";F:\\xml2rfc\\include;F:\\xml2rfc\\bibxml"
   }
   set nativeD [file nativename $inputD]
   if {[lsearch [split $env(XML_LIBRARY) ";"] $nativeD] < 0} {
       set env(XML_LIBRARY) "$nativeD;$env(XML_LIBRARY)"
   }

--=====================_17211280==_--

From: [email-masked] (Michael Richardson)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 19:19:56 -0500
Subject: [xml2rfc] RFC references with handy converter
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:31:32 EST." <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

>>>>> "James" == James M Galvin <[email-masked]> writes:
    James> I've been using the handy converter on the web page to convert an XML
    James> RFC to text, etc., but I can not cross reference the references.

    James> I assumed I could just use:

    James>     <xref target="RFC####">text</xref>

    James> in my text, since those are the targets in the references file if you

  No, you need, as you discovered, to include the reference file. It doesn't
yank them in automatically. That would be nice though...
  I have:

<back>
<references>
%include.reference.OEspec;
<!-- renumber according to reference order -->
%include.reference.RFC.0791;
%include.reference.RFC.1009;
%include.reference.RFC.1984;
%include.reference.RFC.2119;
<!-- IPsec -->
%include.reference.RFC.2401;
<!-- ESPUDP -->
%include.reference.ESPUDP;
<!-- ESPUDP -->
%include.reference.MODPGROUPS;
<!-- DNSSEC -->
%include.reference.RFC.2671;
%include.reference.RFC.1464;
%include.reference.RFC.2535;
%include.reference.RFC.2537;
%include.reference.RFC.2538;
<!-- COPS -->
%include.reference.RFC.2748;
<!-- NAT -->
%include.reference.RFC.2663;
</references>
</back>

  at the end of my document.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] [email-masked] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

From: [email-masked] (Marshall T. Rose)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 15:50:17 -0800
Subject: [xml2rfc] RFC references with handy converter
References: <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <068c01c1a468$b65d33c0$0301000a@FATORA>

hi. privately send me the xml file you're using and i'll take a look.

/mtr

----- Original Message -----
From: "James M Galvin" <[email-masked]>
To: "Marshall T. Rose" <[email-masked]>
Cc: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 15:39
Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] RFC references with handy converter

> My message was obviously not clear.  I have populated <references> with
> the appropriate includes in the form:
>
>     <?rfc include="references.RFC.####" ?>
>
> However, whenever I used <xref target="RFC####"> (substituting for ####)
> I get an error from the handy converter claiming that there needs to be
> an element with the name "RFC####".
>
> If I explicitly include the text of the "<reference>" instead of the
> include then there is no issue.
>
> This suggests to me one of the following three things could be wrong:
>
> 1. there is an XMLism I don't know and am not using
> 2. the anchor is not "RFC####" and thus my target reference is wrong
> 3. there is a bug in the xml2rfc converter
>
> Suggestions?
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Marshall T. Rose wrote:
>
>     Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:46:34 -0800
>     From: Marshall T. Rose <[email-masked]>
>     To: James M Galvin <[email-masked]>,
>          [email-masked]
>     Cc: Marshall Rose <[email-masked]>
>     Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] RFC references with handy converter
>
>     > I've been using the handy converter on the web page to convert an
XML
>     > RFC to text, etc., but I can not cross reference the references.
>     >
>     > I assumed I could just use:
>     >
>     >     <xref target="RFC####">text</xref>
>     >
>     > in my text, since those are the targets in the references file if
you
>     > download the collected works.  However, not only does that target
not
>     > work but all manner of variations I can think of do not work.
>     >
>     > I do get the reference if I include the following in the
<references>:
>     >
>     >
>     >     <?rfc include="references.RFC.####" ?>
>     >
>     > Surely I'm missing something obvious.
>     >
>     > Can anyone help?
>
>     you have to put the <?rfc include="..."?> in your source. when it
expands,
>     it defines the anchor "RFC...." that you can point to with a target.
>
>     in other words, first populate your <references> section with the
citations
>     you want to use, then you can refer to them...
>
>     /mtr
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xml2rfc mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://lists.xml.resource.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc
>

From: [email-masked] (James M Galvin)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:39:42 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [xml2rfc] RFC references with handy converter
In-Reply-To: <05f501c1a45f$cf2f3370$0301000a@FATORA>
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

My message was obviously not clear.  I have populated <references> with
the appropriate includes in the form:

    <?rfc include="references.RFC.####" ?>

However, whenever I used <xref target="RFC####"> (substituting for ####)
I get an error from the handy converter claiming that there needs to be
an element with the name "RFC####".

If I explicitly include the text of the "<reference>" instead of the
include then there is no issue.

This suggests to me one of the following three things could be wrong:

1. there is an XMLism I don't know and am not using
2. the anchor is not "RFC####" and thus my target reference is wrong
3. there is a bug in the xml2rfc converter

Suggestions?

Jim

On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Marshall T. Rose wrote:

    Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:46:34 -0800
    From: Marshall T. Rose <[email-masked]>
    To: James M Galvin <[email-masked]>,
         [email-masked]
    Cc: Marshall Rose <[email-masked]>
    Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] RFC references with handy converter

    > I've been using the handy converter on the web page to convert an XML
    > RFC to text, etc., but I can not cross reference the references.
    >
    > I assumed I could just use:
    >
    >     <xref target="RFC####">text</xref>
    >
    > in my text, since those are the targets in the references file if you
    > download the collected works.  However, not only does that target not
    > work but all manner of variations I can think of do not work.
    >
    > I do get the reference if I include the following in the <references>:
    >
    >
    >     <?rfc include="references.RFC.####" ?>
    >
    > Surely I'm missing something obvious.
    >
    > Can anyone help?

    you have to put the <?rfc include="..."?> in your source. when it expands,
    it defines the anchor "RFC...." that you can point to with a target.

    in other words, first populate your <references> section with the citations
    you want to use, then you can refer to them...

    /mtr

From: [email-masked] (Marshall T. Rose)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:46:34 -0800
Subject: [xml2rfc] RFC references with handy converter
References: <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <05f501c1a45f$cf2f3370$0301000a@FATORA>

> I've been using the handy converter on the web page to convert an XML
> RFC to text, etc., but I can not cross reference the references.
>
> I assumed I could just use:
>
>     <xref target="RFC####">text</xref>
>
> in my text, since those are the targets in the references file if you
> download the collected works.  However, not only does that target not
> work but all manner of variations I can think of do not work.
>
> I do get the reference if I include the following in the <references>:
>
>
>     <?rfc include="references.RFC.####" ?>
>
> Surely I'm missing something obvious.
>
> Can anyone help?

you have to put the <?rfc include="..."?> in your source. when it expands,
it defines the anchor "RFC...." that you can point to with a target.

in other words, first populate your <references> section with the citations
you want to use, then you can refer to them...

/mtr

From: [email-masked] (James M Galvin)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:31:32 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [xml2rfc] RFC references with handy converter
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

I've been using the handy converter on the web page to convert an XML
RFC to text, etc., but I can not cross reference the references.

I assumed I could just use:

    <xref target="RFC####">text</xref>

in my text, since those are the targets in the references file if you
download the collected works.  However, not only does that target not
work but all manner of variations I can think of do not work.

I do get the reference if I include the following in the <references>:

    <?rfc include="references.RFC.####" ?>

Surely I'm missing something obvious.

Can anyone help?

Thanks,

Jim

From: [email-masked] (Marshall T. Rose)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 21:25:58 -0800
Subject: [xml2rfc] Re: ::sgml::tokenise not found: solution
References: <0b0a01c14146$e1e39870$8d53cf3f@FATORA> <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <20010918172801.X1744@SBRIM-W2K> <[email-masked]> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111092045.02b98090@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111103955.02bb18b8@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111134445.0252aa70@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111151624.032c9530@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111164354.02f66ac0@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020114161814.0253bcd0@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020115103933.0341f760@localhost>
Message-ID: <0e0b01c19d85$1d26ae50$0301000a@FATORA>

martin - thanks very much.

what i've done is release xml2rfc 1.10 which includes a specific check for
this problem. if it finds it, it will print out explicit instructions on how
to fix it...

/mtr

From: [email-masked] (Martin Duerst)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:45:36 +0900
Subject: [xml2rfc] ::sgml::tokenise not found: solution
In-Reply-To: <0aac01c19d30$dbdc3f40$0301000a@FATORA>
References: <0b0a01c14146$e1e39870$8d53cf3f@FATORA> <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <20010918172801.X1744@SBRIM-W2K> <[email-masked]> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111092045.02b98090@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111103955.02bb18b8@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111134445.0252aa70@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111151624.032c9530@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111164354.02f66ac0@localhost> <4.2.0.58.J.20020114161814.0253bcd0@localhost>
Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.J.20020115103933.0341f760@localhost>

[cc'ing back to the list, for Fred and everybody else]

With a lot of help from Marshall, I finally solved the problem
of tcl complaining that it couldn't find ::sgml::tokenise.

At 11:22 02/01/14 -0800, Marshall T. Rose wrote:
>it appears that the problem is that the tcl sgml package on your system is
>at 1.8, but the tcl xml package is looking for sgml 1.6, and that sgml 1.8
>no longer has a tokenize command.
>
>what i would do is look in all the tcl areas of your system for a file
>called sgml.tcl. you'll find one in the TclXML directory that came with
>xml2rfc. that one is okay. there is some other one that you need to find.

The file wasn't called sgml.tcl, so it was a bit more difficult to
find. It was called sgml-8.0.tcl, in a folder ...\Tcl\lib\tclxml2.0.

>when you find that, in the same directory there will be a file called
>pkgIndex.tcl, rename that to something else, e.g., pkgIndex-bad.tcl, and
>then tcl won't find it any more.

Changing that file name in the directory mentioned above fixed the
problem.

Regards,    Martin.

From: [email-masked] (Martin Duerst)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:51:13 +0900
Subject: [xml2rfc] issue in xml2rfc installation
In-Reply-To: <019e01c19a39$a42e5dc0$0301000a@FATORA>
References: <0b0a01c14146$e1e39870$8d53cf3f@FATORA> <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <20010918172801.X1744@SBRIM-W2K> <[email-masked]> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111092045.02b98090@localhost>
Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.J.20020111103955.02bb18b8@localhost>

At 16:47 02/01/10 -0800, Marshall T. Rose wrote:
> > Any help appreciated.
>
>tell me what version of xml2rfc you're using and email me the .xml2rfc.rc
>file.

Okay, here we go:

My .xml2rfc.rc is:

 >>>>
global env
if {![info exists env(XML_LIBRARY)]} {
     set env(XML_LIBRARY) ""
     foreach dir [glob -nocomplain "/home/rfcs/bibxml/*/"] {
         append env(XML_LIBRARY) ";$dir"
     }
}
set nativeD [file nativename $inputD]
if {[lsearch [split $env(XML_LIBRARY) ";"] $nativeD] < 0} {
     set env(XML_LIBRARY) "$nativeD;$env(XML_LIBRARY)"
}
 >>>>

The version of xml2rfc is 1.9. Tcl is installed in
D:\PROGS\Tcl; TclXML is at D:\PROGS\Tcl\lib\TclXML-1.1.1.

 From Fred's message, I assume that it maybe should be
D:\PROGS\Tcl\lib\tcl8.3\TclXML-1.1.1; just tried that
and got the same problem.
(I don't use \Program Files for this, because the installer
gave me the distinct impression that Tcl may not be up to
spaces in directory names.)

The Tcl version I use is ActiveState ActiveTcl 8.3.4.1.

Hope this helps.   Regards,    Martin.

From: [email-masked] (Fred Baker)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:52:38 -0800
Subject: [xml2rfc] Re: issue in xml2rfc installation
In-Reply-To: <017901c19a39$4ace9330$0301000a@FATORA>
References: <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <20010918172801.X1744@SBRIM-W2K> <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

--=====================_58758700==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 04:45 PM 1/10/2002, Marshall T. Rose wrote:
>on my (win2k) system, it's: C:\Program Files\Tcl\lib\tcl8.3

yes; I put it, as you sggested, in TclXML-1_0 of that folder.

>can you email me the .xml2rfc.rc file?

One is from the folder containing the "file that worked a month ago", the 
second is the one from your zip file. I don't know how to tell you the 
difference other than I hope you will recognize one of them. In my mail 
application (Eudora 4.3.2) they are ordered as I specified...
--=====================_58758700==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".xml2rfc.rc"

global env

if {![info exists env(XML_LIBRARY)]} {
    set env(XML_LIBRARY) ";D:\\Documents and Settings\\fred\\My Documents\\In-Progress\\XML_LIBRARY"
}
set nativeD [file nativename $inputD]
if {[lsearch [split $env(XML_LIBRARY) ";"] $nativeD] < 0} {
    set env(XML_LIBRARY) "$nativeD;$env(XML_LIBRARY)"
}

--=====================_58758700==_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=".xml2rfc.rc"

global env

if {![info exists env(XML_LIBRARY)]} {
    set env(XML_LIBRARY) ""
    foreach dir [glob -nocomplain "/home/rfcs/bibxml/*/"] {
	append env(XML_LIBRARY) ";$dir"
    }
}
set nativeD [file nativename $inputD]
if {[lsearch [split $env(XML_LIBRARY) ";"] $nativeD] < 0} {
    set env(XML_LIBRARY) "$nativeD;$env(XML_LIBRARY)"
}

--=====================_58758700==_--

From: [email-masked] (Marshall T. Rose)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:47:50 -0800
Subject: [xml2rfc] issue in xml2rfc installation
References: <0b0a01c14146$e1e39870$8d53cf3f@FATORA> <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <20010918172801.X1744@SBRIM-W2K> <[email-masked]> <4.2.0.58.J.20020111092045.02b98090@localhost>
Message-ID: <019e01c19a39$a42e5dc0$0301000a@FATORA>

> Any help appreciated.

tell me what version of xml2rfc you're using and email me the .xml2rfc.rc
file.

thanks,

/mtr

From: [email-masked] (Marshall T. Rose)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:45:39 -0800
Subject: [xml2rfc] Re: issue in xml2rfc installation
References: <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <20010918172801.X1744@SBRIM-W2K> <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <017901c19a39$4ace9330$0301000a@FATORA>

> What's your recommendation? Go back to Tcl 8.0.5?

hi. first, stick with tcl8.3. we're looking at an installation problem, not
a software problem. it can be cleared up pretty easily...

> OK, so I got my system worked on and had to re-install xml2rfc. Downloaded
> the latest version from the site (1.9), whose readme suggested it might
use
> Tcl 8.3. Fine, downloaded 8.3.4.1 and installed it. Kerplunked
> TclXML-8.1.1.1 where the docs said it went.
>
> When I run xml2rfc.tcl to rfc-i-fy an xml file that worked fine a month
> ago, I get a message "invalid command name '::sgml::tokenise"

well, this says that tcl can't find the TclXML package, so what was the name
of the directory where you put the TclXML-1.1.1 stuff?

on my (win2k) system, it's: C:\Program Files\Tcl\lib\tcl8.3

> When I run xml2rfc.tcl on the readme file that comes with the thing,
> although there is a .xml2rfc.rc file in the folder, it tells me that it
> "can't read ENV(XML_LIBRARY)"

hmmm. this is odd because the code that i'm looking at doesn't try to touch
env(XML_LIBRARY) unless it already exists. can you email me the .xml2rfc.rc
file?

thanks,

/mtr

From: [email-masked] (Fred Baker)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:41:37 -0800
Subject: [xml2rfc] issue in xml2rfc installation
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.J.20020111092045.02b98090@localhost>
References: <[email-masked]> <0b0a01c14146$e1e39870$8d53cf3f@FATORA> <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <20010918172801.X1744@SBRIM-W2K> <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

At 04:24 PM 1/10/2002, Martin Duerst wrote:
>The only difference is that I met the second problem first.

my suspicion is that the second problem is spurious. XML_LIBRARY contains 
the xml2rfc directory, not the other way around, so changing the path to 
the library from which you might import reference.mumble files would be a 
useful first step (I missed that, I suppose). But I seem to have a 
programmatic problem on the first issue

From: [email-masked] (Fred Baker)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:31:23 -0800
Subject: [xml2rfc] issue in xml2rfc installation
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.J.20020111092045.02b98090@localhost>
References: <[email-masked]> <0b0a01c14146$e1e39870$8d53cf3f@FATORA> <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <20010918172801.X1744@SBRIM-W2K> <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

At 04:24 PM 1/10/2002, Martin Duerst wrote:
>P.S.: Not that I'm proud of it, but I'm using Win2000.

ditto on both counts

From: [email-masked] (Martin Duerst)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:24:45 +0900
Subject: [xml2rfc] issue in xml2rfc installation
In-Reply-To: <[email-masked]>
References: <0b0a01c14146$e1e39870$8d53cf3f@FATORA> <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <20010918172801.X1744@SBRIM-W2K> <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.J.20020111092045.02b98090@localhost>

I recently installed xml2rfc for the first time,
and had exactly the two same problems as Fred.

The only difference is that I met the second problem
first. I 'got around' that by just setting XML_LIBRARY
to something arbitrary. I thought that that might have
been the reason for getting Fred's first problem, but
I'm glad to see it's not.

Any help appreciated.

Regards,  Martin.

P.S.: Not that I'm proud of it, but I'm using Win2000.

At 15:05 02/01/10 -0800, Fred Baker wrote:
>OK, so I got my system worked on and had to re-install xml2rfc. Downloaded 
>the latest version from the site (1.9), whose readme suggested it might 
>use Tcl 8.3. Fine, downloaded 8.3.4.1 and installed it. Kerplunked 
>TclXML-8.1.1.1 where the docs said it went.
>
>When I run xml2rfc.tcl to rfc-i-fy an xml file that worked fine a month 
>ago, I get a message "invalid command name '::sgml::tokenise"
>
>When I run xml2rfc.tcl on the readme file that comes with the thing, 
>although there is a .xml2rfc.rc file in the folder, it tells me that it 
>"can't read ENV(XML_LIBRARY)"
>
>What's your recommendation? Go back to Tcl 8.0.5?
>
>_______________________________________________
>xml2rfc mailing list
>[email-masked]
>http://lists.xml.resource.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc

From: [email-masked] (Fred Baker)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:05:36 -0800
Subject: [xml2rfc] issue in xml2rfc installation
In-Reply-To: <0b0a01c14146$e1e39870$8d53cf3f@FATORA>
References: <[email-masked]> <[email-masked]> <20010918172801.X1744@SBRIM-W2K> <[email-masked]>
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>

OK, so I got my system worked on and had to re-install xml2rfc. Downloaded 
the latest version from the site (1.9), whose readme suggested it might use 
Tcl 8.3. Fine, downloaded 8.3.4.1 and installed it. Kerplunked 
TclXML-8.1.1.1 where the docs said it went.

When I run xml2rfc.tcl to rfc-i-fy an xml file that worked fine a month 
ago, I get a message "invalid command name '::sgml::tokenise"

When I run xml2rfc.tcl on the readme file that comes with the thing, 
although there is a .xml2rfc.rc file in the folder, it tells me that it 
"can't read ENV(XML_LIBRARY)"

What's your recommendation? Go back to Tcl 8.0.5?