Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] @ipr

From: Frank Ellermann <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:04:44 +0200

On 22 October 2011 09:34, Julian Reschke wrote:

> "full", as far as I can tell, never was a supported
> value.

ACK, my generic "fullsh?t" proposal never made it.
I'd guess that many authors don't care about the
details as long as it results in an acceptable I-D
under the current rules.

Reconstructing IPR boilerplates as they were in the
past is a very special use case, actually I have no
idea why or when folks would ever wish to do this.

-Frank