From holler@ahsoftware.de Sun Aug 14 11:43:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B9F21F87C5 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:43:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.49 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AsIEBNLf1FGY for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:43:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.ahsoftware.de (h1446028.stratoserver.net [85.214.92.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F73221F87C9 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 11:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.ahsoftware.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E91BD4347E4; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:44:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eiche.ahsoftware (p57B2007F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.178.0.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ahsoftware.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60110434126 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:44:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by eiche.ahsoftware (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 990653FD31; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:44:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from krabat.ahsoftware (unknown [192.168.207.2]) by eiche.ahsoftware (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD563FCF9 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E48177A.7060206@ahsoftware.de> Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 20:44:10 +0200 From: Alexander Holler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xmpp@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [xmpp] RFC 6121 - Roster and (full) JIDs with resource X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 18:43:45 -0000 Hello, RFC 6121 doesn't mention what happens with JIDs in roster items with an non empty resource part. Because subscription requests should be treated with the bare JID only, such roster items doesn't seem to make much sence. So, if I don't miss something, the attribute jid of a roster item should be a bare JID (or changed by the server to such). And it might be worth to mention that the change of 'to' in (un)subscribes from full to bare JIDs by the server might lead to error stanzas where the 'from' and 'to' attributes are not only exchanged (because 'to' got modified). Verbose: a presence with type 'subscribe' to 'user@example.com/nick' might result in a presence of type error from 'user@example.com' and not from 'user@example.com/nick' (e.g. with remote-server-not-found) Regards, Alexander From Joe.Hildebrand@webex.com Thu Aug 18 13:52:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F5321F855A for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gZFr6lKRWAjh for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw1.webex.com (gw1.webex.com [64.68.122.208]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EFAD21F8551 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SRV-EXSC03.webex.local ([192.168.252.197]) by gw1.webex.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:53:25 -0700 Received: from 10.154.134.5 ([10.154.134.5]) by SRV-EXSC03.webex.local ([192.168.252.200]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:53:25 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:53:23 -0700 From: Joe Hildebrand To: Peter Saint-Andre , , Peter Saint-Andre Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [xmpp] 6122bis: servers as "registrars" Thread-Index: AcxD2H6q/WCqjWSoTmOJ2wX7Dp2ZSQACG4TwBoH8Y0Q= In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2011 20:53:25.0441 (UTC) FILETIME=[DFBD1B10:01CC5DE8] Cc: xmpp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xmpp] 6122bis: servers as "registrars" X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:52:32 -0000 On 7/16/11 11:51 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" wrote: > Good point. I think only servers that accept account registrations would have > such policies. There are things that are not accounts that might want to adopt the same practices. As example would be MUC rooms that prohibit mutually-confusable room nicks. -- Joe Hildebrand From stpeter@stpeter.im Fri Aug 19 10:02:30 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0148421F8B25 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.617 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.617 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tiURQqfjhNmq for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396E021F8B1E for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-239.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.239]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5C1B415A0; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:05:30 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4E4E975D.1060702@stpeter.im> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:03:25 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Holler References: <4E48177A.7060206@ahsoftware.de> In-Reply-To: <4E48177A.7060206@ahsoftware.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xmpp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xmpp] RFC 6121 - Roster and (full) JIDs with resource X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:02:30 -0000 On 8/14/11 12:44 PM, Alexander Holler wrote: > Hello, > > RFC 6121 doesn't mention what happens with JIDs in roster items with an > non empty resource part. > > Because subscription requests should be treated with the bare JID only, > such roster items doesn't seem to make much sence. > > So, if I don't miss something, the attribute jid of a roster item should > be a bare JID (or changed by the server to such). > > And it might be worth to mention that the change of 'to' in > (un)subscribes from full to bare JIDs by the server might lead to error > stanzas where the 'from' and 'to' attributes are not only exchanged > (because 'to' got modified). Verbose: a presence with type 'subscribe' > to 'user@example.com/nick' might result in a presence of type error from > 'user@example.com' and not from 'user@example.com/nick' (e.g. with > remote-server-not-found) Section 3.1.1 says: A user's client generates a subscription request by sending a presence stanza of type "subscribe" and specifying a 'to' address of the potential contact's bare JID . UC: When a user sends a presence subscription request to a potential instant messaging and presence contact, the value of the 'to' attribute MUST be a bare JID rather than a full JID , since the desired result is for the user to receive presence from all of the contact's resources, not merely the particular resource specified in the 'to' attribute. Use of bare JIDs also simplifies subscription processing, presence probes, and presence notifications by the user's server and the contact's server. Note also that the checks in Section 3.2.2, 3.3.3, and 4.3 (including all of its subsections) are all based on the bare JID. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ From stpeter@stpeter.im Fri Aug 19 10:02:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B655221F8B6C for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.616 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0D86YhfN-lMJ for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE3821F8B67 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-239.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.239]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C22C7415A0; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:05:51 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4E4E9772.5000306@stpeter.im> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:03:46 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Hildebrand References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xmpp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xmpp] 6122bis: servers as "registrars" X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:02:51 -0000 On 8/18/11 2:53 PM, Joe Hildebrand wrote: > On 7/16/11 11:51 AM, "Peter Saint-Andre" wrote: > >> Good point. I think only servers that accept account registrations would have >> such policies. > > There are things that are not accounts that might want to adopt the same > practices. As example would be MUC rooms that prohibit mutually-confusable > room nicks. Agreed. /psa From holler@ahsoftware.de Fri Aug 19 11:37:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C94421F8B38 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:37:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.49 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HELO_MISMATCH_DE=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nCatiPLJ+jJn for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.ahsoftware.de (h1446028.stratoserver.net [85.214.92.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ABB21F8AF8 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:37:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.ahsoftware.de (Postfix, from userid 65534) id E0D2F434611; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:38:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eiche.ahsoftware (p57B2021A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.178.2.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ahsoftware.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04A65434061 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:37:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by eiche.ahsoftware (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 1EE113FD26; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:37:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from krabat.ahsoftware (unknown [192.168.207.2]) by eiche.ahsoftware (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B043FCD4; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E4EAD68.5050300@ahsoftware.de> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:37:28 +0200 From: Alexander Holler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Saint-Andre References: <4E48177A.7060206@ahsoftware.de> <4E4E975D.1060702@stpeter.im> In-Reply-To: <4E4E975D.1060702@stpeter.im> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: xmpp@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xmpp] RFC 6121 - Roster and (full) JIDs with resource X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:37:05 -0000 Am 19.08.2011 19:03, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre: > On 8/14/11 12:44 PM, Alexander Holler wrote: >> Hello, >> >> RFC 6121 doesn't mention what happens with JIDs in roster items with an >> non empty resource part. >> >> Because subscription requests should be treated with the bare JID only, >> such roster items doesn't seem to make much sence. >> >> So, if I don't miss something, the attribute jid of a roster item should >> be a bare JID (or changed by the server to such). >> >> And it might be worth to mention that the change of 'to' in >> (un)subscribes from full to bare JIDs by the server might lead to error >> stanzas where the 'from' and 'to' attributes are not only exchanged >> (because 'to' got modified). Verbose: a presence with type 'subscribe' >> to 'user@example.com/nick' might result in a presence of type error from >> 'user@example.com' and not from 'user@example.com/nick' (e.g. with >> remote-server-not-found) > > Section 3.1.1 says: > > A user's client generates a subscription request by sending a > presence stanza of type "subscribe" and specifying a 'to' address of > the potential contact's bare JID . I've read that and the following sections. But I've written the above complain because nowhere in section 2 is something written about the type of JIDs in rosters. So according to RFC 6121 it is possible to add a JID with a resource part to the roster, even if it doesn't make sense, at least not in regard to subscriptions. Regards, Alexander From ben@nostrum.com Fri Aug 19 13:36:45 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF4E11E80D6 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:36:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.514 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FU65PhT0CvZW for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:36:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BC411E80D5 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:36:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.6] (cpe-76-187-75-59.tx.res.rr.com [76.187.75.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7JKbeDC047465 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:37:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com) From: Ben Campbell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:37:34 -0500 Message-Id: To: XMPP Group Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3) Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 76.187.75.59 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Subject: [xmpp] Minutes from IETF81 X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:36:45 -0000 Hi, The minutes from the XMPP meeting at IETF81 are available at the = following location. Please send any corrections to the chairs as soon as = possible. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/xmpp.txt Thanks! Ben. From stpeter@stpeter.im Fri Aug 19 14:02:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F146E1F0C3B for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:02:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.616 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.616 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V1LN6g34Ihlo for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD791F0C34 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-239.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.239]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F3F6415A0 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:05:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4E4ECFA2.4040009@stpeter.im> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:03:30 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: XMPP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [xmpp] i18n progress X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:02:34 -0000 I've just submitted new versions of draft-blanchet-precis-framework and draft-saintandre-xmpp-6122bis, incorporating feedback from the meetings in Quebec. I expect that the framework document will now be accepted as a WG item in the PRECIS WG, thus hopefully removing any obstacles to accepting 6122bis as a WG item in the XMPP WG. http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-blanchet-precis-framework-03.txt http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-saintandre-xmpp-6122bis-02.txt Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ From stpeter@stpeter.im Wed Aug 24 15:20:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CCF21F8B7E for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:20:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.485 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FS8S5nsy0J+W for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C953A21F8B91 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (unknown [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B537C4167D for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:23:34 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4E557959.9080503@stpeter.im> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:21:13 -0600 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: XMPP References: <4E4ECFA2.4040009@stpeter.im> In-Reply-To: <4E4ECFA2.4040009@stpeter.im> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3 OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [xmpp] i18n progress X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: XMPP Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:20:06 -0000 On 8/19/11 3:03 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > I've just submitted new versions of draft-blanchet-precis-framework and > draft-saintandre-xmpp-6122bis, incorporating feedback from the meetings > in Quebec. I expect that the framework document will now be accepted as > a WG item in the PRECIS WG, thus hopefully removing any obstacles to > accepting 6122bis as a WG item in the XMPP WG. Done: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-precis-framework-00 /psa