From duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp  Sun Dec  2 23:38:43 2012
Return-Path: <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF0421F8AEB for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  2 Dec 2012 23:38:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.445
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.445 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.144, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265,  MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HIRybLzXDIlJ for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  2 Dec 2012 23:38:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp [133.2.253.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914D021F8AE9 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Sun,  2 Dec 2012 23:38:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp ([133.2.253.231]) by scintmta02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp (secret/secret) with SMTP id qB37cWoJ000843 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:38:32 +0900
Received: from (unknown [133.2.206.133]) by scmse02.scbb.aoyama.ac.jp with smtp id 3bdd_d885_6ff0cda8_3d1c_11e2_8e4c_001d096c5782; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 16:38:31 +0900
Received: from [IPv6:::1] ([133.2.210.1]:49626) by itmail.it.aoyama.ac.jp with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id <S161B2C7> for <xmpp@ietf.org> from <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 16:38:32 +0900
Message-ID: <50BC56F5.5020708@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 16:38:29 +0900
From: =?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Organization: Aoyama Gakuin University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100722 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
References: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F75EE78@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>	<50B4F2F0.3050406@stpeter.im> <50B652A7.2030502@ninebynine.org>	<50B65E7D.9050005@stpeter.im>	<C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E371700C3@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com>	<50B68BBA.1000302@stpeter.im> <50B69BF5.2040808@stpeter.im>	<gokdb8hcanf2j32jc0rern9am6tgf8sr2s@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>	<50B6E049.9050401@stpeter.im>	<f1pdb89cmbdqqkvk8jo5sv7olbddv1a4qs@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>	<50B6E9D8.5090109@stpeter.im> <50B770B8.1030400@ninebynine.org>
In-Reply-To: <50B770B8.1030400@ninebynine.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "xmpp@ietf.org" <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] [Uri-review]   XMPP jabber: URI scheme not registered?
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:38:43 -0000

On 2012/11/29 23:27, Graham Klyne wrote:

> (FWIW, I thought it was easier to just say "encoded as UTF-8 within XMPP
> streams" than to explain why that's not relevant or out-of-scope.)

It may be easier, but it's technically wrong. This may not hurt here, 
but it may hurt somewhere else down the line because people may get 
confused.

Regards,    Martin.


> So, as Martin says, just "ship it" (with or without the above point).
>
> #g
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Uri-review mailing list
> Uri-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>

From stpeter@stpeter.im  Tue Dec  4 17:43:06 2012
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AB121F893A; Tue,  4 Dec 2012 17:43:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.507
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vg4UjqN7Ba-U; Tue,  4 Dec 2012 17:43:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E682621F8907; Tue,  4 Dec 2012 17:43:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.154.128.144] (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0468F403C4; Tue,  4 Dec 2012 18:48:21 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <50BEA6AC.1080905@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:43:08 -0800
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
References: <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F75EE78@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <50B4F2F0.3050406@stpeter.im> <50B652A7.2030502@ninebynine.org> <50B65E7D.9050005@stpeter.im> <C68CB012D9182D408CED7B884F441D4D1E371700C3@nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com> <50B68BBA.1000302@stpeter.im> <50B69BF5.2040808@stpeter.im> <gokdb8hcanf2j32jc0rern9am6tgf8sr2s@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <50B6E049.9050401@stpeter.im> <f1pdb89cmbdqqkvk8jo5sv7olbddv1a4qs@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <50B6E9D8.5090109@stpeter.im> <50B770B8.1030400@ninebynine.org> <50B7C915.3040708@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <50B7C915.3040708@stpeter.im>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "xmpp@ietf.org" <xmpp@ietf.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] [Uri-review] XMPP jabber: URI scheme not registered?
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:43:06 -0000

On 11/29/12 12:44 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 11/29/12 7:27 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>> On 29/11/2012 04:51, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

<snip/>

>> So, as Martin says, just "ship it" (with or without the above
>> point).
> 
> Done (with the above point).

Registration complete:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/perm/jabber

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



From stpeter@stpeter.im  Wed Dec  5 06:21:19 2012
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865DC21F8509; Wed,  5 Dec 2012 06:21:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ROPkYkG-+W0z; Wed,  5 Dec 2012 06:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07DE21F850E; Wed,  5 Dec 2012 06:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [107.16.139.97] (unknown [107.16.139.97]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC85E4049A; Wed,  5 Dec 2012 07:26:37 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <50BF5861.1010305@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 06:21:21 -0800
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>, "simple@ietf.org" <simple@ietf.org>, XMPP Standards <standards@xmpp.org>
References: <20121205144844.60e29b80cd96e2f9acfe1af5@jprs.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20121205144844.60e29b80cd96e2f9acfe1af5@jprs.co.jp>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20121205144844.60e29b80cd96e2f9acfe1af5@jprs.co.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [xmpp] Fwd: [precis] WGLC: draft-ietf-precis-nickname-05.txt
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:21:19 -0000

FYI, this is your last chance to provide input on this spec. Please send
feedback to the precis@ietf.org list.

Thanks!

Peter

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [precis] WGLC: draft-ietf-precis-nickname-05.txt
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 14:48:44 +0900
From: Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
To: precis@ietf.org

Dear all,

This message starts two weeks Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on
draft-ietf-precis-nickname-05.txt (Preparation and Comparison of
Nicknames).

Please review the document and send comments to the list, the
co-chairs, or the authors (draft-ietf-precis-nickname.all@tools.ietf.org)
by the end of WGLC.

The WGLC will end on Wednesday, Dec 19th.

Regards,

-- Marc & Yoshiro, co-chairs

_______________________________________________
precis mailing list
precis@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis



From ben@nostrum.com  Tue Dec 11 13:08:54 2012
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F2B21F8561; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:08:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.401
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.199, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SxrPzELajJPP; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:08:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7CD11E80AE; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.14] (cpe-76-187-92-156.tx.res.rr.com [76.187.92.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id qBBL8phY050919 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:08:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <50BF5861.1010305@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:08:57 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1AAFC2B6-E12C-4F69-BEFD-41E119FBD0FA@nostrum.com>
References: <20121205144844.60e29b80cd96e2f9acfe1af5@jprs.co.jp> <50BF5861.1010305@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 76.187.92.156 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "simple@ietf.org" <simple@ietf.org>, XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>, XMPP Standards <standards@xmpp.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] [precis] WGLC: draft-ietf-precis-nickname-05.txt
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:08:54 -0000

(as co-chair of both SIMPLE and XMPP)

This definitely impacts SIMPLE (simple-chat depends on it) , and could =
have implications for XMPP. If you are interested in either or both, =
please send comments If you haven't already done so for this version.  =
If it's fine like it is, that's still a useful comment!

Thanks!

Ben.


On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:21 AM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> =
wrote:

> FYI, this is your last chance to provide input on this spec. Please =
send
> feedback to the precis@ietf.org list.
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> Peter
>=20
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [precis] WGLC: draft-ietf-precis-nickname-05.txt
> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 14:48:44 +0900
> From: Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
> To: precis@ietf.org
>=20
> Dear all,
>=20
> This message starts two weeks Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on
> draft-ietf-precis-nickname-05.txt (Preparation and Comparison of
> Nicknames).
>=20
> Please review the document and send comments to the list, the
> co-chairs, or the authors =
(draft-ietf-precis-nickname.all@tools.ietf.org)
> by the end of WGLC.
>=20
> The WGLC will end on Wednesday, Dec 19th.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> -- Marc & Yoshiro, co-chairs
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> precis mailing list
> precis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> xmpp mailing list
> xmpp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp


From fippo@goodadvice.pages.de  Sun Dec 16 23:49:29 2012
Return-Path: <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4DC21F8DEA for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:49:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f65Zr8f+7+uT for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:49:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lo.psyced.org (lost.IN.psyced.org [188.40.42.221]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E120521F8D77 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 23:49:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lo.psyced.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lo.psyced.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id qBH7nO0v025599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:49:24 +0100
Received: from localhost (fippo@localhost) by lo.psyced.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id qBH7nN5m025596; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:49:23 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: lo.psyced.org: fippo owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:49:23 +0100 (CET)
From: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
X-X-Sender: fippo@lo.psyced.org
To: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E0D87D70-2B68-4A5A-8BF7-3FDDC0E91449@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1212170836300.25388@lo.psyced.org>
References: <E0D87D70-2B68-4A5A-8BF7-3FDDC0E91449@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: XMPP Working Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] UPDATED: draft-miller-xmpp-posh-prooftype
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:49:30 -0000

On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Matt Miller (mamille2) wrote:
> An update to draft-miller-xmpp-posh-prooftype is now available.  The only change is the syntax of the .well-known URI.
>
> < http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-miller-xmpp-posh-prooftype-01 >
>
>
> Enjoy!

Just had a chance to do so again -- some questions:
1) can there be multiple certificates (for rollover) in the file?
2) can the file contain a chain of certificates or is this limited to the
    end entity certificate?
3) is the subject of the certificate(s) fetched checked against RFC 6125?
    If not, wouldn't it be sufficient to compare hashes?