From henrik@levkowetz.com Tue Apr 26 05:55:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D36BE075D for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 05:55:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BDqGrNFv9Nft for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 05:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88193E0750 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 05:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:58495 helo=dyn-fg117.sth.netnod.se) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QEhn6-00025V-3m; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:54:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4DB6C09D.3060104@levkowetz.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:54:53 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Subject: [yaco-idsubmit-tool] Fwd: Bug report in new IDST X-BeenThere: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / I-D Submission Tool Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:55:04 -0000 Hi Emilio, Please see below. The observation is correct, of course -- the tool needs to allow posting of correctly dated drafts from any timezone. Best, Henrik -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Bug report in new IDST Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:19:49 -0400 From: Matt Larson To: Henrik Levkowetz CC: Glen Barney Hi Henrik! We've received a ticket for the new IDST: > Hi, > > There's a timezone-related bug in the new I-D submission tool, > which did not exist in the old version. > > It flags a metatdata error thus: > > "Creation date 2011-04-26 > Creation Date must not be set after submission date" > > I am submitting a draft created a few moments ago, just after > 17:00 (5 pm.) today April 26th, New Zealand Standard Time. > > Oh look, it's still April 25th in California - you guys are > sooo backward :-) > > The tool needs to have enough tolerance to deal with submissions > from the other side of the world, like the previous version did. > > (OK, I know the workaround, but this bug needs to be fixed.) > > -- > Regards > Brian Carpenter Matt ------------------------------------------- Matthew Larson, Asst. IT Director Association Management Solutions Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning 48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538 http://www.amsl.com From henrik@levkowetz.com Tue Apr 26 06:01:57 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF58E0771 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:01:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DiNNhTFjbAFu for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C45E0764 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:58528 helo=dyn-fg117.sth.netnod.se) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QEhtj-0007UJ-GE; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:01:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4DB6C23B.2000008@levkowetz.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:01:47 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Subject: [yaco-idsubmit-tool] Fwd: RE: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue] X-BeenThere: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / I-D Submission Tool Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:01:57 -0000 Hi Emilio, Please see below. The observation is correct -- a http GET should not have side effects, so we need to make the confirmation link return a web page with a confirmation button (which will do the appropriate POST which should make the actual confirmation happen. Best, Henrik -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue] Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:56:29 -0700 From: Dan Wing To: 'Henrik Levkowetz' , 'Mark Nottingham' CC: 'IETF TOOLS discussion' > -----Original Message----- > From: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tools-discuss- > bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Levkowetz > Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 2:24 AM > To: Mark Nottingham > Cc: IETF TOOLS discussion > Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the > rescue] > > Hi, > > The new draft submission tool doesn't have this problem. Just now I used the new submission tool for the first time, and it also seemed to only need a GET to authorize the actual posting of the I-D. -d > I'm about to > start merging that code to the trunk of the datatracker svn repository > in something like 10 minutes from now, and do the first deployment > today. > > > Best, > > Henrik > > > > On 2011-03-23 00:25 Mark Nottingham said the following: > > In case this hasn't been seen -- it needs to be fixed (i.e., a GET > shouldn't have such side effects). > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > >> *Resent-From: *ietf-http-wg@w3.org > >> *From: *Stephane Bortzmeyer > > >> *Date: *23 March 2011 12:01:23 AM AEDT > >> *To: *HTTP Working Group wg@w3.org>> > >> *Subject: **[vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue]* > >> *organization: *NIC France > >> *archived-at: * > >> > >> The draft management tool apparently can change the state of a draft > >> in response to a simple GET... > >> > >> Nice violation of the HTTP standard :-) > >> > >> *From: *Paul Vixie > > >> *Date: *19 March 2011 2:50:30 AM AEDT > >> *To: *dnsext@ietf.org > >> *Subject: **googlebot to the rescue* > >> > >> > >> i think the 0x20 draft was going nowhere in any case so cancelling > it is fine. > >> > >> 148.68.249.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer > >> crawl-66-249-68-148.googlebot.com 148.googlebot.com>. > >> > >> crawl-66-249-68-148.googlebot.com 148.googlebot.com> has address 66.249.68.148 > >> > >> it's interesting that it can be done by a web crawler, though. > >> > >> re: > >> > >> > >> *From: *IETF I-D Submission Tool > > >> *Date: *18 March 2011 10:36:25 PM AEDT > >> *To: *ipr@ietf.org , dagon@cc.gatech.edu > , vixie@isc.org > >> *Subject: **Submission of draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00 has been > Cancelled * > >> > >> > >> This message is to notify you that submission of an Internet-Draft, > draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00, has just been cancelled by a user whose > computer has an IP address of 66.249.68.148. > >> > >> The IETF Secretariat. > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dnsext mailing list > >> dnsext@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tools-discuss mailing list > > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > _______________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list > Tools-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss From esanchez@yaco.es Tue Apr 26 06:39:37 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D6EE07A4 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:39:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.816 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.816 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hSGlhh5vzUuA for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:39:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FCEE06BC for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so534379wyb.31 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.200.138 with SMTP id ew10mr798797wbb.21.1303825175055; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.197] ([77.227.215.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z13sm3852481wbd.63.2011.04.26.06.39.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DB6CB18.5080903@yaco.es> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:39:36 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Emilio_A=2E_S=E1nchez=22?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org References: <4DB6C23B.2000008@levkowetz.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB6C23B.2000008@levkowetz.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [yaco-idsubmit-tool] Fwd: RE: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue] X-BeenThere: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / I-D Submission Tool Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:39:37 -0000 Hi Henrik, I'm going to check all the views. Some of them (like approve or confirm view) are used as action in POST forms but if the user makes a GET request by hand the view also does the work. By the way, it seems that the original problem was that a webcrawler was launching actions in the old tool, with the new tool it doesn't happen cause the confirmation link is send by mail and contains a confirmation code so no webcrawler will follow it. But I'm going to do the changes so we respect the HTTP standard :) El 26/04/11 15:01, Henrik Levkowetz escribió: > Hi Emilio, > > Please see below. The observation is correct -- a http GET should not > have side effects, so we need to make the confirmation link return a > web page with a confirmation button (which will do the appropriate POST > which should make the actual confirmation happen. > > > Best, > > Henrik > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue] > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:56:29 -0700 > From: Dan Wing > To: 'Henrik Levkowetz', 'Mark Nottingham' > CC: 'IETF TOOLS discussion' > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tools-discuss- >> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Levkowetz >> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 2:24 AM >> To: Mark Nottingham >> Cc: IETF TOOLS discussion >> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the >> rescue] >> >> Hi, >> >> The new draft submission tool doesn't have this problem. > > Just now I used the new submission tool for the first time, and it also > seemed to only need a GET to authorize the actual posting of the I-D. > > -d > > >> I'm about to >> start merging that code to the trunk of the datatracker svn repository >> in something like 10 minutes from now, and do the first deployment >> today. >> >> >> Best, >> >> Henrik >> >> >> >> On 2011-03-23 00:25 Mark Nottingham said the following: >>> In case this hasn't been seen -- it needs to be fixed (i.e., a GET >> shouldn't have such side effects). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> *Resent-From: *ietf-http-wg@w3.org >>>> *From: *Stephane Bortzmeyer> > >>>> *Date: *23 March 2011 12:01:23 AM AEDT >>>> *To: *HTTP Working Group> wg@w3.org>> >>>> *Subject: **[vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue]* >>>> *organization: *NIC France >>>> *archived-at: * >>>> >>>> The draft management tool apparently can change the state of a draft >>>> in response to a simple GET... >>>> >>>> Nice violation of the HTTP standard :-) >>>> >>>> *From: *Paul Vixie> >>>> *Date: *19 March 2011 2:50:30 AM AEDT >>>> *To: *dnsext@ietf.org >>>> *Subject: **googlebot to the rescue* >>>> >>>> >>>> i think the 0x20 draft was going nowhere in any case so cancelling >> it is fine. >>>> >>>> 148.68.249.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer >>>> crawl-66-249-68-148.googlebot.com> 148.googlebot.com>. >>>> >>>> crawl-66-249-68-148.googlebot.com> 148.googlebot.com> has address 66.249.68.148 >>>> >>>> it's interesting that it can be done by a web crawler, though. >>>> >>>> re: >>>> >>>> >>>> *From: *IETF I-D Submission Tool> > >>>> *Date: *18 March 2011 10:36:25 PM AEDT >>>> *To: *ipr@ietf.org, dagon@cc.gatech.edu >> , vixie@isc.org >>>> *Subject: **Submission of draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00 has been >> Cancelled * >>>> >>>> >>>> This message is to notify you that submission of an Internet-Draft, >> draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00, has just been cancelled by a user whose >> computer has an IP address of 66.249.68.148. >>>> >>>> The IETF Secretariat. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dnsext mailing list >>>> dnsext@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tools-discuss mailing list >>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >> _______________________________________________ >> Tools-discuss mailing list >> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > yaco-idsubmit-tool mailing list > yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-idsubmit-tool From esanchez@yaco.es Tue Apr 26 07:55:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFF7E077A for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:55:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.816 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.816 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1QXoPZRkuqt for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BD1E0772 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so613340wyb.31 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.0.152 with SMTP id 24mr872254wbb.126.1303829749047; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.197] ([77.227.215.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l24sm3896728wbc.47.2011.04.26.07.55.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DB6DCF6.3060501@yaco.es> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:55:50 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Emilio_A=2E_S=E1nchez=22?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org References: <4DB6C23B.2000008@levkowetz.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB6C23B.2000008@levkowetz.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [yaco-idsubmit-tool] Fwd: RE: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue] X-BeenThere: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / I-D Submission Tool Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:55:55 -0000 Ticket #650 [1] is finished. Now any of the submission tool urls must change nothing in response to GET request. Best, [1] http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/ticket/650 El 26/04/11 15:01, Henrik Levkowetz escribió: > Hi Emilio, > > Please see below. The observation is correct -- a http GET should not > have side effects, so we need to make the confirmation link return a > web page with a confirmation button (which will do the appropriate POST > which should make the actual confirmation happen. > > > Best, > > Henrik > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: RE: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue] > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:56:29 -0700 > From: Dan Wing > To: 'Henrik Levkowetz', 'Mark Nottingham' > CC: 'IETF TOOLS discussion' > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tools-discuss- >> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Levkowetz >> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 2:24 AM >> To: Mark Nottingham >> Cc: IETF TOOLS discussion >> Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: [vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the >> rescue] >> >> Hi, >> >> The new draft submission tool doesn't have this problem. > > Just now I used the new submission tool for the first time, and it also > seemed to only need a GET to authorize the actual posting of the I-D. > > -d > > >> I'm about to >> start merging that code to the trunk of the datatracker svn repository >> in something like 10 minutes from now, and do the first deployment >> today. >> >> >> Best, >> >> Henrik >> >> >> >> On 2011-03-23 00:25 Mark Nottingham said the following: >>> In case this hasn't been seen -- it needs to be fixed (i.e., a GET >> shouldn't have such side effects). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>>> *Resent-From: *ietf-http-wg@w3.org >>>> *From: *Stephane Bortzmeyer> > >>>> *Date: *23 March 2011 12:01:23 AM AEDT >>>> *To: *HTTP Working Group> wg@w3.org>> >>>> *Subject: **[vixie@isc.org: googlebot to the rescue]* >>>> *organization: *NIC France >>>> *archived-at: * >>>> >>>> The draft management tool apparently can change the state of a draft >>>> in response to a simple GET... >>>> >>>> Nice violation of the HTTP standard :-) >>>> >>>> *From: *Paul Vixie> >>>> *Date: *19 March 2011 2:50:30 AM AEDT >>>> *To: *dnsext@ietf.org >>>> *Subject: **googlebot to the rescue* >>>> >>>> >>>> i think the 0x20 draft was going nowhere in any case so cancelling >> it is fine. >>>> >>>> 148.68.249.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer >>>> crawl-66-249-68-148.googlebot.com> 148.googlebot.com>. >>>> >>>> crawl-66-249-68-148.googlebot.com> 148.googlebot.com> has address 66.249.68.148 >>>> >>>> it's interesting that it can be done by a web crawler, though. >>>> >>>> re: >>>> >>>> >>>> *From: *IETF I-D Submission Tool> > >>>> *Date: *18 March 2011 10:36:25 PM AEDT >>>> *To: *ipr@ietf.org, dagon@cc.gatech.edu >> , vixie@isc.org >>>> *Subject: **Submission of draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00 has been >> Cancelled * >>>> >>>> >>>> This message is to notify you that submission of an Internet-Draft, >> draft-vixie-dnsext-dns0x20-00, has just been cancelled by a user whose >> computer has an IP address of 66.249.68.148. >>>> >>>> The IETF Secretariat. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dnsext mailing list >>>> dnsext@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tools-discuss mailing list >>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >> _______________________________________________ >> Tools-discuss mailing list >> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > yaco-idsubmit-tool mailing list > yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-idsubmit-tool From esanchez@yaco.es Tue Apr 26 08:12:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6EEE0757 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:12:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.817 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.817 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_BOGUSMX=1.482, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S9NdYEd0nY1Y for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com (mail-ww0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44B2E07DE for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so536896wwa.13 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.130.96 with SMTP id r32mr914852wbs.67.1303830745794; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.197] ([77.227.215.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h11sm3905398wbc.60.2011.04.26.08.12.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:12:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DB6E0DC.2080801@yaco.es> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:12:28 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Emilio_A=2E_S=E1nchez=22?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Thunderbird/3.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org References: <4DB6C09D.3060104@levkowetz.com> In-Reply-To: <4DB6C09D.3060104@levkowetz.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [yaco-idsubmit-tool] Fwd: Bug report in new IDST X-BeenThere: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / I-D Submission Tool Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:12:33 -0000 Hi Henrik, I have solved it just like the old told does by allowing that the creation date is three days after or three days before the current submission date. See http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/ticket/652 Best, El 26/04/11 14:54, Henrik Levkowetz escribió: > Hi Emilio, > > Please see below. The observation is correct, of course -- the tool > needs to allow posting of correctly dated drafts from any timezone. > > > Best, > > Henrik > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Bug report in new IDST > Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 06:19:49 -0400 > From: Matt Larson > To: Henrik Levkowetz > CC: Glen Barney > > Hi Henrik! > > We've received a ticket for the new IDST: > >> Hi, >> >> There's a timezone-related bug in the new I-D submission tool, >> which did not exist in the old version. >> >> It flags a metatdata error thus: >> >> "Creation date 2011-04-26 >> Creation Date must not be set after submission date" >> >> I am submitting a draft created a few moments ago, just after >> 17:00 (5 pm.) today April 26th, New Zealand Standard Time. >> >> Oh look, it's still April 25th in California - you guys are >> sooo backward :-) >> >> The tool needs to have enough tolerance to deal with submissions >> from the other side of the world, like the previous version did. >> >> (OK, I know the workaround, but this bug needs to be fixed.) >> >> -- >> Regards >> Brian Carpenter > > Matt > > > ------------------------------------------- > Matthew Larson, Asst. IT Director > Association Management Solutions > Forum Management, Meeting and Event Planning > 48377 Fremont Blvd., Suite 117, Fremont, CA 94538 > http://www.amsl.com > > > _______________________________________________ > yaco-idsubmit-tool mailing list > yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yaco-idsubmit-tool From henrik@levkowetz.com Tue Apr 26 09:46:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCE7E0760 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k1fbP6xHZM2b for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81536E07A2 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:50829 helo=dyn-fg124.sth.netnod.se) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QElPM-0000he-Lq; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:46:43 +0200 Message-ID: <4DB6F6EF.8010709@levkowetz.com> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:46:39 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Subject: [yaco-idsubmit-tool] Fwd: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-00 X-BeenThere: yaco-idsubmit-tool@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the Yaco / I-D Submission Tool Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:46:53 -0000 Hi Emilio, Please see below. There are two adjustments which are needed for the I-D submission tool. The first is a tweak to the template for the new version notification messages; submissions which aren't working group documents or special submissions should be called 'Individual Submission' rather than the current 'Independent Submission'. The second is to take care of documents named 'draft-iesg-*'. These are not individual submissions, but IESG submissions, and should be treated as an exception, saying 'IESG' instead of 'Individual Submission'. We probably should change the 'WG ID:' string to something more fitting, too, but that's a minor template tweak. Best, Henrik -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-00 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:19:44 -0500 From: Robert Sparks To: Henrik Levkowetz CC: Russ Housley Hi Henrik - Two things: 1) Can we make the submission tool label these "Individual Submission" and not "Independent Submission" below. Independent Submission is a term used with the Independent Stream, and this is training people to use it a different way. 2) Can we have it notice draft-iesg- as a special case? Begin forwarded message: > From: Russ Housley > Date: April 22, 2011 2:23:34 PM CDT > To: IESG > Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-00 > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool >> Date: April 22, 2011 3:20:19 PM EDT >> To: housley@vigilsec.com >> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-00 >> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-iesg-rfc1150bis-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Russ Housley and posted to the IETF repository. >> >> Filename: draft-iesg-rfc1150bis >> Revision: 00 >> Title: FYI on FYI: No Additional FYI Notes >> Creation_date: 2011-04-22 >> WG ID: Independent Submission >> Number_of_pages: 2 >> >> Abstract: >> The FYIs (For Your Information) sub-series of RFCs was used by the >> IETF User Services Area, which no longer exists. The IESG does not >> intend to make any further additions to the FYI sub-series. >> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat. >> >> >