From nobody Thu Feb 2 13:27:55 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CE9129581 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:27:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -17.721 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.721 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQWRTYRX5-JW for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:27:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75868129537 for ; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:27:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=548; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486070873; x=1487280473; h=to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=vtuw+KV1onSf9PO9mgbkTV4rFCMDEpzq9yqLHtWNaDo=; b=cV0DL3yTcllP8Jsvwi+1JjP0hOvZKCC+rXFu2zN0S/e9umdnK2TfHZnx TqdnTGGN6Wss/yLArovYA1cYZ8HVKB+VBAjAzOkwv2beHsgcwoWmPb50h z+lQP2lMCSmffJJ6iq9bbm/PMOOx0yRMsG+bIq1R2k5UDDXPyGRZ4iqTr I=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0A7GQAMpJNY/4oNJK1dGwEBAQMBAQEJA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBg1OBC4Q2m3STRYIPgg2GIoJZQRYBAgEBAQEBAQFiHQuFDQYVQTUCJgJfDQg?= =?us-ascii?q?BAYltrFqCJYsrAQEBAQEFAQEBASSBC4dFCIo1gl8FkDSLKQGBTJA6gWOIWYZGi?= =?us-ascii?q?wWIAiYNJDqBERWHHolXAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,326,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="202094614" Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 02 Feb 2017 21:27:26 +0000 Received: from [128.107.147.20] (tme-pc.cisco.com [128.107.147.20]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v12LRQoo009120; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 21:27:26 GMT To: "yang-multicast@ietf.org" From: "Stig Venaas (svenaas)" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:27:26 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 21:27:54 -0000 Hi We need to see how to proceed with these drafts. draft-ietf-pim-yang-03 This was waiting for resolution of the BFD issue. It looks like we know how to proceed now. Are you updating the draft with the changes needed? Anything else other than BFD? We can hopefully do a final WGLC when we have the next revision. draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-01 Is this ready for WGLC you think? Are you planning any changes? draft-zhang-pim-msdp-yang-02 Can I start an adoption call for this, or do you want to make any changes first? Stig From nobody Fri Feb 3 09:19:58 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C382129463 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:19:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8gFw5c_5uhKz for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:19:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf0-x242.google.com (mail-lf0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11AE0129407 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:19:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id x1so2037179lff.0 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:19:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=wjfpxiG2LFUZdJ8Dq/L1hoOdKgKuZRxahkbEC+ICgCw=; b=GN0nx4ap6AKGQ1zVHwdAq5tV5JxcnDSCHEjAfQVak1+ZRn0XK2Pv22BQYYkQvd1Wpe fYP8jo22rsm4Dcxn5nQsUqIcf1oziPflCDIrKYyq1qoyYa8FKf+XR6ozVaN19r8xK32Q rcg+HUSrx3yNdytw3rrqh20bS8H/AfBTlMHyiWdjZH/hVQpsjf1OlQQ/Wy5qESROZb4e ZEs9KXwCrLGWjWfs5dPbasDyLCmc4oz7ou08YHdJDc+Dj5VmFxBpQHN/xxTZhl6Z+3z9 s1tB82yYq/ZoXxsCOzMS3Z1uplati1FJm/Vp3lLKf6IH3tDgU/ZYrf/c8mnflJA7mKds ln/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=wjfpxiG2LFUZdJ8Dq/L1hoOdKgKuZRxahkbEC+ICgCw=; b=LCuYjb9J8jdv1btWYrbodCnJtM5NLZ09Cho+/cCKcOib/y96IELcNoptkIPPa48997 H6dg90kp2o4oMfMN+cFtLUwO9uu8iTP71lnhwYdVIRHdBc5PeG+zdET1J9VLt5P1Uc0p vIq2nf8n8u0VISw9dFDXNsFp3/XvBYi2SterjJHtKMdtaTdjtFl/MHYDHZWczoa5adKv XkXC+gsSyWi/0SU6vRB6xZMG2dVTaL0udVaT50Ds4gBTG28iSqAGVuWTWsYAr4SyraEJ fJVj541Fo1zJ3K02E/WSoT12CnKo4168eHLRcux11H8BoMkILWo+HMdSbnVSe3po/XzK wh1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIRRTpIrdw699tHSpa9E+dk7uoUKg1daiASJZqR6DuJx5nj9q+/iejQ+iJIeINAOg== X-Received: by 10.25.211.132 with SMTP id k126mr5726017lfg.61.1486142393214; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:19:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from xliuus (wsip-98-191-72-170.dc.dc.cox.net. [98.191.72.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i186sm7754826lfg.38.2017.02.03.09.19.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:19:52 -0800 (PST) From: "Xufeng Liu" To: "'Stig Venaas \(svenaas\)'" , References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:19:49 -0500 Message-ID: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQGqUZp2M8hY5EjoaYMYv+GLkjkkgaGn2FVg Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 17:19:57 -0000 Hi Stig, > -----Original Message----- > From: Yang-multicast [mailto:yang-multicast-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Stig Venaas (svenaas) > Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 4:27 PM > To: yang-multicast@ietf.org > Cc: 'Mike McBride' > Subject: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts > > Hi > > We need to see how to proceed with these drafts. > > draft-ietf-pim-yang-03 > This was waiting for resolution of the BFD issue. It looks like we know how to > proceed now. Are you updating the draft with the changes needed? Anything > else other than BFD? We can hopefully do a final WGLC when we have the next > revision. [Xufeng] Yes. We are updating the draft to incorporate BFD according to the resolution. We are also updating the draft according to the comments from Yang doctor's review. Other than these, currently there is a draft defining common Yang types in Routing Area (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-00). I'm not sure if we need to synch with it or we can proceed independently. > > draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-01 > Is this ready for WGLC you think? Are you planning any changes? [Xufeng] During the process of updating draft-ietf-pim-yang-03, I have found some items that are obliviously applicable to this draft also. I'm thinking to do a quick update within a week or two. > > draft-zhang-pim-msdp-yang-02 > Can I start an adoption call for this, or do you want to make any changes first? [Xufeng] I think that the adoption call can start now. > > Stig > > _______________________________________________ > Yang-multicast mailing list > Yang-multicast@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast From nobody Fri Feb 3 09:23:34 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C17712948B for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:23:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -17.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9KW4xWl_sQJ3 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:23:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88CAE129484 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:23:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2236; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486142611; x=1487352211; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0g0qXpCXUjU1jHX3IARKgADtCF1ZWVGmkT0vPzmGVDg=; b=QJvufWguZdZ1b/ifiqyBenJtOl6MHe0wyUgVSqAhxbDMgNsWTFMQUis5 qnYxdqAZtXScv1L+F1QOoR1LYe7ktBvBroC8ZjBX+EtZUV2l5wjWeIk8s 6yJZc8k6AujrDo4TajQ0MIZdHIrLWXOzVuv2J+BlxOe3kmmziaLF59/Ir A=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CyBABhvJRY/40NJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1NhKl+NYJIMiBKNKYINHwuFeAKCXj8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEaQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMBAQEbGzYLDAQLEQQBAQEnByEGHwkIBgEMBgIBAYlVAw0IDrA/hzYNg28BA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYhQgmqCUYdhBZA4inM4AYZnhwmEF4F7iEG?= =?us-ascii?q?GRogoggVZiAQfODqBERU7hmNUiSABAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,329,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="379203703" Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Feb 2017 17:23:24 +0000 Received: from [128.107.147.20] (tme-pc.cisco.com [128.107.147.20]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v13HNNwN008442; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:23:24 GMT To: Xufeng Liu , yang-multicast@ietf.org References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> From: "Stig Venaas (svenaas)" Message-ID: <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:23:23 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 17:23:33 -0000 Hi On 2/3/2017 9:19 AM, Xufeng Liu wrote: > Hi Stig, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yang-multicast [mailto:yang-multicast-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Stig Venaas (svenaas) >> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 4:27 PM >> To: yang-multicast@ietf.org >> Cc: 'Mike McBride' >> Subject: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts >> >> Hi >> >> We need to see how to proceed with these drafts. >> >> draft-ietf-pim-yang-03 >> This was waiting for resolution of the BFD issue. It looks like we know > how to >> proceed now. Are you updating the draft with the changes needed? Anything >> else other than BFD? We can hopefully do a final WGLC when we have the > next >> revision. > > [Xufeng] Yes. We are updating the draft to incorporate BFD according to the > resolution. We are also updating the draft according to the comments from > Yang doctor's review. Other than these, currently there is a draft defining > common Yang types in Routing Area > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-00). I'm not > sure if we need to synch with it or we can proceed independently. Are there types defined in this 00 version that you are not using, and maybe should use? Or are you more concerned that there might be later changes? It would be good to be in line with this version where you think it makes sense. I wouldn't want us to wait on future changes. If necessary that can be done later in the process too. >> >> draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-01 >> Is this ready for WGLC you think? Are you planning any changes? > > [Xufeng] During the process of updating draft-ietf-pim-yang-03, I have found > some items that are obliviously applicable to this draft also. I'm thinking > to do a quick update within a week or two. > OK, thanks. >> draft-zhang-pim-msdp-yang-02 >> Can I start an adoption call for this, or do you want to make any changes > first? > > [Xufeng] I think that the adoption call can start now. Great, Stig >> >> Stig >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Yang-multicast mailing list >> Yang-multicast@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast > From nobody Fri Feb 3 09:29:26 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F774129484 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:29:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8nrgBxB0B0PI for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:29:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf0-x243.google.com (mail-lf0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C00C129438 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:29:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id h65so2049000lfi.3 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:29:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=u/m5haGVH5hom9+aIG+adqa3zv7IJtzKGvqRLKMzou8=; b=FqM1do81fOBFjW6PtXAB0vVA5XHz12TayaHUsdNpOng4vHXsiBxabk4BzWgaoQf3Xb kVTZgpEDBPjP73BRD37kkSzsMFYUVVGuFjr2xmAh+8oA8bF82KCv7ya1lRoAUOpsJH10 5O/bBNh/n92211K9GetYTESMyDX4pAXo/SV5hMZJR0wsRXaOxKYOGOzzGFx1DiFHJl1f XjIozG3OFHB8Bewjeh1Rjwt3JRqvbvY8Wtzlw5ncLp15VAvDMS+qXLwXFLthxXheT8yP pI3hFgIvIk2v0GnxSw4S/oyNEk7TuBfApJQenga35T8wZQNw7UAIBoECQjQxx09AjNzO ogcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=u/m5haGVH5hom9+aIG+adqa3zv7IJtzKGvqRLKMzou8=; b=sLhnZesCajC5vO0YSTqZBYirTATBSetuL32R2CCszupu8FLdxxpXNk0K3g2EzrRrN1 pafUgsXgrV9DGD7MWO9aY+kI0XchweRzuTo6BHdlqxBD7K7pzAaQeLkW4Mt0cmixY+4h hyC6EnluV3m64TuU+yEkgXZWh9DlikZX4EQjaD5inDUaTSFJmDNHlCh5GjlmgIEXt/3A 2/f0KHVFfchn0z8rcbqcWnVFxbjej9wwaypxt9KEuS8GNQ024x/k6KarNZ6p/9fun+pn zBZ5fFKSdO1bsk5662nXUT5vL17nvwWqBrgeZTrAnwLAnv5d1GxEIcgtZ75Nfbq6a0Ev spFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKczo1Or/3WWa20wq32Ps9Fry8PndCnsYptSGXx5OusLQUgKdR1e1RdusRosgRY6A== X-Received: by 10.46.76.9 with SMTP id z9mr5871891lja.1.1486142961555; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:29:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from xliuus (wsip-98-191-72-170.dc.dc.cox.net. [98.191.72.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x7sm3198230ljd.15.2017.02.03.09.29.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:29:21 -0800 (PST) From: "Xufeng Liu" To: "'Stig Venaas \(svenaas\)'" , References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 12:29:18 -0500 Message-ID: <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQGqUZp2M8hY5EjoaYMYv+GLkjkkgQJldqdXArsF3Tihft3IQA== Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 17:29:25 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 12:23 PM > To: Xufeng Liu ; yang-multicast@ietf.org > Cc: 'Mike McBride' > Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts > > Hi > > On 2/3/2017 9:19 AM, Xufeng Liu wrote: > > Hi Stig, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Yang-multicast [mailto:yang-multicast-bounces@ietf.org] On > >> Behalf Of Stig Venaas (svenaas) > >> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 4:27 PM > >> To: yang-multicast@ietf.org > >> Cc: 'Mike McBride' > >> Subject: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> We need to see how to proceed with these drafts. > >> > >> draft-ietf-pim-yang-03 > >> This was waiting for resolution of the BFD issue. It looks like we > >> know > > how to > >> proceed now. Are you updating the draft with the changes needed? > >> Anything else other than BFD? We can hopefully do a final WGLC when > >> we have the > > next > >> revision. > > > > [Xufeng] Yes. We are updating the draft to incorporate BFD according > > to the resolution. We are also updating the draft according to the > > comments from Yang doctor's review. Other than these, currently there > > is a draft defining common Yang types in Routing Area > > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-00). I'm > > not sure if we need to synch with it or we can proceed independently. > > Are there types defined in this 00 version that you are not using, and maybe > should use? Or are you more concerned that there might be later changes? [Xufeng] Right. We haven't used it because there might be later changes. It > would be good to be in line with this version where you think it makes sense. I > wouldn't want us to wait on future changes. If necessary that can be done later > in the process too. [Xufeng] Alright. I'll use it during the updating. > > >> > >> draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-01 > >> Is this ready for WGLC you think? Are you planning any changes? > > > > [Xufeng] During the process of updating draft-ietf-pim-yang-03, I have > > found some items that are obliviously applicable to this draft also. > > I'm thinking to do a quick update within a week or two. > > > > OK, thanks. > > >> draft-zhang-pim-msdp-yang-02 > >> Can I start an adoption call for this, or do you want to make any > >> changes > > first? > > > > [Xufeng] I think that the adoption call can start now. > > Great, > > Stig > > >> > >> Stig > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Yang-multicast mailing list > >> Yang-multicast@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast > > From nobody Fri Feb 3 09:53:50 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED221294C7 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:53:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -17.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygjD-4C9ZRac for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:53:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87FB512948B for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:53:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3100; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486144427; x=1487354027; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=37Zzjn7VoveHza8bruDl12EGJq6uPOnz4k1BgmF291A=; b=i8sEkvUG9Nab+pV1hDW69A8SBCpuZzchgMC+osYxtx9j/FYBbM0q+o4z CzL//Fl+qDce0UviD7Y2bIestabOTgmmOlL6N/dqSGD/hRmKD5OJJDMgb fqeODpgbbCrKQ6J3Tz+Bp8ezKkOCpE0szGQ0YxJ3OPb6cXqoT0UIac3WL o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CyBAAYw5RY/49dJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1NhKl+NYJIMiBKNKYINHwuFeAKCXj8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEaQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQQBARsbNgsMBAsRBAEBAScHIQYfCQgGAQwGAgEBiVUDFQ6wSYc3DYNvAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWIUIJqglGHYQWQOIUShWE4AYZnhwmEF4F7iEG?= =?us-ascii?q?GRogoggVZiAQfODqBERU7hmNUAYkfAQEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,329,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="202485728" Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2017 17:53:46 +0000 Received: from [128.107.147.20] (tme-pc.cisco.com [128.107.147.20]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v13HrkN1024509; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 17:53:46 GMT To: Xufeng Liu , yang-multicast@ietf.org References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> From: "Stig Venaas (svenaas)" Message-ID: <3fc68abe-7b78-043a-0bd9-61f2e5044bdc@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:53:45 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 17:53:49 -0000 Hi On 2/3/2017 9:29 AM, Xufeng Liu wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] >> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 12:23 PM >> To: Xufeng Liu ; yang-multicast@ietf.org >> Cc: 'Mike McBride' >> Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts >> >> Hi >> >> On 2/3/2017 9:19 AM, Xufeng Liu wrote: >>> Hi Stig, >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Yang-multicast [mailto:yang-multicast-bounces@ietf.org] On >>>> Behalf Of Stig Venaas (svenaas) >>>> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 4:27 PM >>>> To: yang-multicast@ietf.org >>>> Cc: 'Mike McBride' >>>> Subject: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> We need to see how to proceed with these drafts. >>>> >>>> draft-ietf-pim-yang-03 >>>> This was waiting for resolution of the BFD issue. It looks like we >>>> know >>> how to >>>> proceed now. Are you updating the draft with the changes needed? >>>> Anything else other than BFD? We can hopefully do a final WGLC when >>>> we have the >>> next >>>> revision. >>> >>> [Xufeng] Yes. We are updating the draft to incorporate BFD according >>> to the resolution. We are also updating the draft according to the >>> comments from Yang doctor's review. Other than these, currently there >>> is a draft defining common Yang types in Routing Area >>> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-00). I'm >>> not sure if we need to synch with it or we can proceed independently. >> >> Are there types defined in this 00 version that you are not using, and > maybe >> should use? Or are you more concerned that there might be later changes? > [Xufeng] Right. We haven't used it because there might be later changes. > It >> would be good to be in line with this version where you think it makes > sense. I >> wouldn't want us to wait on future changes. If necessary that can be done > later >> in the process too. > [Xufeng] Alright. I'll use it during the updating. It's really up to you guys what makes sense. One thing to consider I guess is whether other routing drafts are also adopting them. I don't know, so I'll leave it to you. >> >>>> >>>> draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-01 >>>> Is this ready for WGLC you think? Are you planning any changes? >>> >>> [Xufeng] During the process of updating draft-ietf-pim-yang-03, I have >>> found some items that are obliviously applicable to this draft also. >>> I'm thinking to do a quick update within a week or two. >>> >> >> OK, thanks. >> >>>> draft-zhang-pim-msdp-yang-02 >>>> Can I start an adoption call for this, or do you want to make any >>>> changes >>> first? >>> >>> [Xufeng] I think that the adoption call can start now. >> >> Great, >> >> Stig >> >>>> >>>> Stig >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Yang-multicast mailing list >>>> Yang-multicast@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast >>> > > From nobody Tue Feb 7 03:29:33 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1144E129B5F for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 03:29:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dBtsFHJvcwdE for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 03:29:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39C06129B67 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 03:29:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3475; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486466961; x=1487676561; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nAzPKPh464XQ6Eles2eLMdqJ+9WP9pYdVdBybkH2l2Q=; b=BGaof5WZccgK9vmGvMRDeczd6K2RkuevfPup3LzEldlP6nFChEqoTzEV Z0mi8ajfzTHhW+Egeo6oUMqIOG5nWrg8T2IUJwFIZRhNFAmlIhefnoE7V YcjoEx1lbrvRt8wkPqVV0b/ws/dMHfJKjdsnUcziG2v1C94oDkWpFgnhk U=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,346,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="650475900" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Feb 2017 11:29:19 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v17BTJVg028176; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:29:19 GMT To: "Stig Venaas (svenaas)" , Xufeng Liu , yang-multicast@ietf.org References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> <3fc68abe-7b78-043a-0bd9-61f2e5044bdc@cisco.com> From: Benoit Claise Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 12:29:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3fc68abe-7b78-043a-0bd9-61f2e5044bdc@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:29:32 -0000 On 2/3/2017 6:53 PM, Stig Venaas (svenaas) wrote: > Hi > > On 2/3/2017 9:29 AM, Xufeng Liu wrote: >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] >>> Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 12:23 PM >>> To: Xufeng Liu ; yang-multicast@ietf.org >>> Cc: 'Mike McBride' >>> Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> On 2/3/2017 9:19 AM, Xufeng Liu wrote: >>>> Hi Stig, >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Yang-multicast [mailto:yang-multicast-bounces@ietf.org] On >>>>> Behalf Of Stig Venaas (svenaas) >>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 4:27 PM >>>>> To: yang-multicast@ietf.org >>>>> Cc: 'Mike McBride' >>>>> Subject: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts >>>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> We need to see how to proceed with these drafts. >>>>> >>>>> draft-ietf-pim-yang-03 >>>>> This was waiting for resolution of the BFD issue. It looks like we >>>>> know >>>> how to >>>>> proceed now. Are you updating the draft with the changes needed? >>>>> Anything else other than BFD? We can hopefully do a final WGLC when >>>>> we have the >>>> next >>>>> revision. >>>> >>>> [Xufeng] Yes. We are updating the draft to incorporate BFD according >>>> to the resolution. We are also updating the draft according to the >>>> comments from Yang doctor's review. Other than these, currently there >>>> is a draft defining common Yang types in Routing Area >>>> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types-00). I'm >>>> not sure if we need to synch with it or we can proceed independently. >>> >>> Are there types defined in this 00 version that you are not using, and >> maybe >>> should use? Or are you more concerned that there might be later >>> changes? >> [Xufeng] Right. We haven't used it because there might be later changes. >> It >>> would be good to be in line with this version where you think it makes >> sense. I >>> wouldn't want us to wait on future changes. If necessary that can be >>> done >> later >>> in the process too. >> [Xufeng] Alright. I'll use it during the updating. > > It's really up to you guys what makes sense. One thing to consider I > guess is whether other routing drafts are also adopting them. Yes, there are. Regards, B. > I don't > know, so I'll leave it to you. > >>> >>>>> >>>>> draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-01 >>>>> Is this ready for WGLC you think? Are you planning any changes? >>>> >>>> [Xufeng] During the process of updating draft-ietf-pim-yang-03, I have >>>> found some items that are obliviously applicable to this draft also. >>>> I'm thinking to do a quick update within a week or two. >>>> >>> >>> OK, thanks. >>> >>>>> draft-zhang-pim-msdp-yang-02 >>>>> Can I start an adoption call for this, or do you want to make any >>>>> changes >>>> first? >>>> >>>> [Xufeng] I think that the adoption call can start now. >>> >>> Great, >>> >>> Stig >>> >>>>> >>>>> Stig >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Yang-multicast mailing list >>>>> Yang-multicast@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast >>>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Yang-multicast mailing list > Yang-multicast@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast > . > From nobody Wed Feb 8 13:35:23 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF4D129501 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:35:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.523 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wv6bkm2BFmdM for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:35:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7E271295F7 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:35:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=219; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486589703; x=1487799303; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kuGIxJywCcRhT+WZw07eN5J0mEJ1WSccZcJxSBrmEQw=; b=AaK3cz05Z9cIbjcvBN6AlJrYMn349b9bb+JbPA7sa/8U8SFUbhRtGq7I uaDbl+bp4UQ7C1hUUOGg9dY1bzVTcbnLus55nofIhntYWakGFZbr2hEDK yo1HZqp6iDRuiIIP+bYbG/o7F8Z/5wxwC8OuwQCVunsfB+ZBXz0pJ7Rnc o=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BOBADwjZtY/4oNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1GBC6Aqk0aEG4YiAoJvQxQBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRqBh0bQRALRlc?= =?us-ascii?q?GAQwIAQGJcLJWi1ABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEgiFEIgmKKOQEEkEGLLwGSE?= =?us-ascii?q?YFjAYhbhkaLDogFNiE6RE8Vhx+JUgEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,348,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="204283699" Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 08 Feb 2017 21:35:03 +0000 Received: from [128.107.151.78] (dhcp-128-107-151-78.cisco.com [128.107.151.78]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v18LZ2Lu004541; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 21:35:02 GMT To: Xufeng Liu , yang-multicast@ietf.org References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> From: "Stig Venaas (svenaas)" Message-ID: <5f83af01-9f23-0dd7-9645-783c13a2b37f@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:35:02 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 21:35:21 -0000 Hi I'm hoping that both the pim and igmp/mld drafts can be updated within a week or two. I'll start WGLCs as soon as you have submitted the new versions. I started the adoption call for the msdp draft. Stig From nobody Fri Feb 10 07:11:33 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB801299C4 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 07:11:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJDqYhNsn_GQ for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 07:11:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yb0-x236.google.com (mail-yb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 617101299BF for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 07:11:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb0-x236.google.com with SMTP id j82so12074688ybg.1 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 07:11:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=ITj2riHpAPiI5ka9QN++Cipb2izkw2R9X+ovyM0QA6o=; b=Vqxe0zsxlkZCyg536GiWYYZpYr/Gngzs3Kr4kLTaDWWy1XVGEqGFG83F3Uc4R2OjA6 CSCoEra3y6gNhbzXq+P8SeJgrpUT07O/VvidvYJjUW1RvlpVW0uBGn7YZ1rIxDMEtJ0C bKsusvF/qhA/bQrwbBCVZHxF3fMCknCfvZA0sU8iwRT85oGULYZK4Seiun3vdl9Xj97H k9a+KwTL8hV+oUOqSbabwkyuhv9EHwbZ46S1OVKGuDe2w3Y7PgmTrlNguRip2O8f/GLz s0jkvAWIOXgTRO4T/7X4XajUh4oeYgibaWdenvQlqO/fOPVcVKEgsx9ALqvWfoJzov0W Ve6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=ITj2riHpAPiI5ka9QN++Cipb2izkw2R9X+ovyM0QA6o=; b=l+8JW76Jso6emtTEhFOzclHX5v7v7b7mXV+xrIX8Sm/wqXBbyTBB1qtpYa3qMtSZPY 6b9qK/JFTZwCu+X/qkBM8GzlmEO4vRTfxljQNglFNZQOETNnW8yley7Q037X6Fn3N7hF PNYsLlIwvJHWxZ9Q0+9BCxFlIHMbxm3hNO6hdobm1hRJ0tbobrIh+dsmrcMg7pzyQdIB PnAvj0/oZUYT7VlEkI51GMgWOCUoyVzZVk1PWj4BItv0irQzBaw1k4WhyXU7x9Roo94N OccvjksSkISXbW0QuWbR5ql83pOsYru/oOQSWG3lXpQtG/bX3MCJA3RpT7UdHO/gPey9 6pgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lsy8fwbiPq7VORXxGGOmGV3AqMaBEiYacn1gVvQp4ojAfHQIPmm/ul7DB5yYxLpQ== X-Received: by 10.37.170.243 with SMTP id t106mr6604351ybi.171.1486739489674; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 07:11:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from xliuus (ip72-209-195-86.dc.dc.cox.net. [72.209.195.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v207sm889706ywa.6.2017.02.10.07.11.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 07:11:29 -0800 (PST) From: "Xufeng Liu" To: "'Stig Venaas \(svenaas\)'" , References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> <5f83af01-9f23-0dd7-9645-783c13a2b37f@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <5f83af01-9f23-0dd7-9645-783c13a2b37f@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 10:11:30 -0500 Message-ID: <044f01d283af$f58909c0$e09b1d40$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQGqUZp2M8hY5EjoaYMYv+GLkjkkgQJldqdXArsF3TgCpyzzjQMWcCgIoVvJifA= Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 15:11:32 -0000 Hi, I have just updated the model with the aligned bfd and ietf-routing-types, along with some text changes to address Yang doctor's review comments. The updated model and draft have been put to GitHub: https://github.com/mcallisterjp/pim-yang I cannot publish this version yet, because it uses some un-published upcoming types from ietf-routing-types (which should be updated within a couple of weeks). Meanwhile, can authors and contributors review this version on GitHub, and help to fix any potential issues? Thanks, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 4:35 PM > To: Xufeng Liu ; yang-multicast@ietf.org > Cc: 'Mike McBride' > Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts > > Hi > > I'm hoping that both the pim and igmp/mld drafts can be updated within a week > or two. I'll start WGLCs as soon as you have submitted the new versions. > > I started the adoption call for the msdp draft. > > Stig From nobody Fri Feb 10 08:19:30 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A5D1299EB for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:19:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.523 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lQN7Jl47x_dF for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:19:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F112129989 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:19:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1647; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486743567; x=1487953167; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ig1Cm0d2249AJhl2RTh3iqUN9pq/hc+lwzyOGLc9XXo=; b=BX6Nb/Oip9r5HVOZmCeoW+Z284JzlDypLDnPX5LfNRSnXqAbce10itxq Hgg32H/C7tdajODAPqkcy2fMngEoqKRMTGdZVddQXX8nkGASH0v8aNuI9 V7PnjlFuBDeLJ7p0rema0HZb+2qt/rANCNTWRgmENMgXodLPmeVRcvLPR A=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,142,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="650567125" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2017 16:19:26 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1AGJPnW021735; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:19:25 GMT To: Xufeng Liu , "'Stig Venaas (svenaas)'" , yang-multicast@ietf.org References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> <5f83af01-9f23-0dd7-9645-783c13a2b37f@cisco.com> <044f01d283af$f58909c0$e09b1d40$@gmail.com> From: Benoit Claise Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:19:26 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <044f01d283af$f58909c0$e09b1d40$@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:19:29 -0000 Hi Xufeng, > Hi, > > I have just updated the model with the aligned bfd and ietf-routing-types, > along with some text changes to address Yang doctor's review comments. The > updated model and draft have been put to GitHub: > https://github.com/mcallisterjp/pim-yang > I cannot publish this version yet, because it uses some un-published > upcoming types from ietf-routing-types (which should be updated within a > couple of weeks). Instead of waiting on the dependencies, I propose that you publish now with the new types. While waiting for publication (of the ietf-routing-types), it doesn't hurt to have the same typedefs in both dratfs. We just have to remember to use the import once ietf-routing-types is finalized. Regards, B. > > Meanwhile, can authors and contributors review this version on GitHub, and > help to fix any potential issues? > > Thanks, > > - Xufeng > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 4:35 PM >> To: Xufeng Liu ; yang-multicast@ietf.org >> Cc: 'Mike McBride' >> Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts >> >> Hi >> >> I'm hoping that both the pim and igmp/mld drafts can be updated within a > week >> or two. I'll start WGLCs as soon as you have submitted the new versions. >> >> I started the adoption call for the msdp draft. >> >> Stig > _______________________________________________ > Yang-multicast mailing list > Yang-multicast@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast > . > From nobody Fri Feb 10 08:29:44 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574B6129A27 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:29:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.523 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zq1H1LDxCASD for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:29:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14234129A2B for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:23:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1956; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486743797; x=1487953397; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MhIE1dlnhyQIxAQw0bVgjW4lRebVkmaBfZHmuTNpaM8=; b=AcYH0Ch6FgXn2sjZ6yXoiBBXauA6MxKcV0Ht4KltuE7HJhkDyv39Gpi1 SYvSHh6J5jEDe7EKmQ//G9IURXGM4N86xsv8WcrLDCJIjWdZrzW5jQME9 XJ88tHmhdFp3ycWxBwg8vi+BKyvqSkS06kJxeN858WsRdHsifY0/F+WDb o=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,142,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="179145153" Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Feb 2017 16:23:16 +0000 Received: from [10.24.33.235] ([10.24.33.235]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1AGNFpL026073; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:23:16 GMT To: Benoit Claise , Xufeng Liu , yang-multicast@ietf.org References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> <5f83af01-9f23-0dd7-9645-783c13a2b37f@cisco.com> <044f01d283af$f58909c0$e09b1d40$@gmail.com> From: "Stig Venaas (svenaas)" Message-ID: <3c75171f-072d-17f4-cded-276e598d3b58@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 08:23:15 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 16:29:43 -0000 Hi On 2/10/2017 8:19 AM, Benoit Claise wrote: > Hi Xufeng, >> Hi, >> >> I have just updated the model with the aligned bfd and >> ietf-routing-types, >> along with some text changes to address Yang doctor's review comments. >> The >> updated model and draft have been put to GitHub: >> https://github.com/mcallisterjp/pim-yang >> I cannot publish this version yet, because it uses some un-published >> upcoming types from ietf-routing-types (which should be updated within a >> couple of weeks). > Instead of waiting on the dependencies, I propose that you publish now > with the new types. > While waiting for publication (of the ietf-routing-types), it doesn't > hurt to have the same typedefs in both dratfs. > We just have to remember to use the import once ietf-routing-types is > finalized. If you post it now I can start the WGLC. We can still make some minor adjustments in a couple of weeks when the routing types draft has been updated and we're done with the WGLC. Stig > Regards, B. >> >> Meanwhile, can authors and contributors review this version on GitHub, >> and >> help to fix any potential issues? >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Xufeng >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 4:35 PM >>> To: Xufeng Liu ; yang-multicast@ietf.org >>> Cc: 'Mike McBride' >>> Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I'm hoping that both the pim and igmp/mld drafts can be updated within a >> week >>> or two. I'll start WGLCs as soon as you have submitted the new versions. >>> >>> I started the adoption call for the msdp draft. >>> >>> Stig >> _______________________________________________ >> Yang-multicast mailing list >> Yang-multicast@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast >> . >> > From nobody Thu Feb 16 07:19:49 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60123129509 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:19:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7IjIpPb8ScP1 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:19:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf0-x243.google.com (mail-lf0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBFE81294AB for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:13:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id q89so1718301lfi.1 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:13:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=ihhY4VIrlvySoKhXYvYyE8gy/frFGIv9U1xrZYwHhzo=; b=BzrhUhHUgrwxiBzJ5oKSUGF8fJQk0tJY64dJ7zr7sVWj3020oEw64rCYpcZURAqUUM uGO+zRyNQkf6NIi/DjCVliF4DNa8VKDoeKD9f+M4j1cuchZUivMygLi9NDNBUvNL28RR 6RswL8zajJLMCHv/fBq5J3Z0++JmheOYWZVTjcWLA5XWgfUlOXABD8Z4MVknvWMTI8/G Ejlcc38RiCGNOqzh/u7Sr8mxdxF1xWK9dMAtGurFFWnNVFDEZlsyViUKSj2+ZqudVHhk oyzH6PUHUM95Le5qoDkeqkH003bmMUc5oUJkxHqYyFucvW8aOOorVvOwiWu92cGq1zmi fvMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=ihhY4VIrlvySoKhXYvYyE8gy/frFGIv9U1xrZYwHhzo=; b=nLQiI6YidIub+V9WG+oPgxM/uIGcGtZu0iy9zAdUVVZKNOOklzPhrp9vph+bul6Smr /hJhgsWF+IDbgy3wRIq1QPDUX0TTAn1NA/Z2PHUKoA1vlG8pAE/htsW5/Gs9tM1wWtN4 lIYM0F0BXfa7i5deGo2FAxdboB0cz4HERAxqveUsczEbeysDi6HJhRg3BM4jwiAIlcyi HdmZvWi2XLA9D3eLSZizYNsiGTOxhB1Uawp3Wzaftd91u5Z1tdeNo/A8v2n61o1yrWYc UHpSuv3Iam4N57B4MEnd1K+EojeptFwDKsp9QGuhUksS1owhjsURrCgHn5irlELgejwi 4xGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m2GgxsJm+Pr4J+4dtNKRJZHjkY2cnDoJH8ySKW0GPEoS+y8nndl5or6oktz5bmLQ== X-Received: by 10.25.199.21 with SMTP id x21mr919911lff.84.1487257990835; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:13:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from xliuus (wsip-98-191-72-170.dc.dc.cox.net. [98.191.72.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 187sm1793975ljf.12.2017.02.16.07.13.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:13:10 -0800 (PST) From: "Xufeng Liu" To: "'Stig Venaas \(svenaas\)'" , "'Benoit Claise'" , References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> <5f83af01-9f23-0dd7-9645-783c13a2b37f@cisco.com> <044f01d283af$f58909c0$e09b1d40$@gmail.com> <3c75171f-072d-17f4-cded-276e598d3b58@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <3c75171f-072d-17f4-cded-276e598d3b58@cisco.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:13:07 -0500 Message-ID: <006501d28867$2f0c25e0$8d2471a0$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQGqUZp2M8hY5EjoaYMYv+GLkjkkgQJldqdXArsF3TgCpyzzjQMWcCgIAZr7D3ICLoQUHgG0/nr2oTlGH4A= Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:19:48 -0000 Hi Stig, Will post the updated within a couple of days. Thanks, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 11:23 AM > To: Benoit Claise ; Xufeng Liu ; > yang-multicast@ietf.org > Cc: 'Mike McBride' > Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts > > Hi > > On 2/10/2017 8:19 AM, Benoit Claise wrote: > > Hi Xufeng, > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have just updated the model with the aligned bfd and > >> ietf-routing-types, along with some text changes to address Yang > >> doctor's review comments. > >> The > >> updated model and draft have been put to GitHub: > >> https://github.com/mcallisterjp/pim-yang > >> I cannot publish this version yet, because it uses some un-published > >> upcoming types from ietf-routing-types (which should be updated > >> within a couple of weeks). > > Instead of waiting on the dependencies, I propose that you publish now > > with the new types. > > While waiting for publication (of the ietf-routing-types), it doesn't > > hurt to have the same typedefs in both dratfs. > > We just have to remember to use the import once ietf-routing-types is > > finalized. > > If you post it now I can start the WGLC. We can still make some minor > adjustments in a couple of weeks when the routing types draft has been updated > and we're done with the WGLC. > > Stig > > > Regards, B. > >> > >> Meanwhile, can authors and contributors review this version on > >> GitHub, and help to fix any potential issues? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> - Xufeng > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] > >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 4:35 PM > >>> To: Xufeng Liu ; yang-multicast@ietf.org > >>> Cc: 'Mike McBride' > >>> Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts > >>> > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> I'm hoping that both the pim and igmp/mld drafts can be updated > >>> within a > >> week > >>> or two. I'll start WGLCs as soon as you have submitted the new versions. > >>> > >>> I started the adoption call for the msdp draft. > >>> > >>> Stig > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Yang-multicast mailing list > >> Yang-multicast@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast > >> . > >> > > From nobody Mon Feb 20 06:59:00 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4025D1295A6 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 06:58:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WZYtkasjQBNb for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 06:58:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CD6B12950F for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 06:58:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id b80so14329941lfe.3 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 06:58:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=nQq3vQlKKLNJuQv8bDJpJa6gDSDnlYOPuHV4B6MzyQA=; b=TytXTac00i3k2w8IQrmQq9CWEjmrB7oTR9t+lLrqnFsVohKr03vfdj3w6tr/hlxfM8 WuT151WZ55SBqSoFP62w/A0EZvmheP/hA+SQXe/6OjNnSjaqjKndSxm7MxiWHlVSjIT/ o5QTAXvOYNhZCsXxiq3ycueCajx+6rrX66JUiWGYv5EgmoaJWgOBXwOYl5Rn+0Daa+qa Ub6PumjUkfi6LgFvNo7iM10DvkjWFhI93qi4VULwXBBKRvZg9oNQBJQj1SAHIUaphFvr 28KwbjQfxGcbnCMP049IO6DpnK6qnhDaRJW653BzR1jOpdJhCVuHaEmG3DgQI8Y33SHy oPUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=nQq3vQlKKLNJuQv8bDJpJa6gDSDnlYOPuHV4B6MzyQA=; b=M4ABoR7D0p0OJewuZpPydqvBKmibMmrxtLquAVovN+mnslOr1H1KFC8kLxmolhHQiG lfcWLFTQ+reeqC7CAHaUmSw1AU50shIuLe8lsjFGJ8dJf/EinEaGMLKiJE4v9TEE3BPD NYW8DWHAJRnhW8hF3WaJNjh7LfOc5IEsXTm4Am6pRnDY+ZOeyvkHEN2ESlRY0ITgI1jX +PevpmBNbW9u05l1DyuG3PuSgmRzWegkL9jp93PDUQD7pj3D5UxLvY56hkPYC2d1bfGG Rjh57SuG04QbrlEB6R7yTMxknAt7LcHN9As5Gq8RXfLJh+qn6a/ciiecc4Fgx4+KD7lG ykRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lp58VEq0EGHMYs04+xiM4SbpUG82G1xc2JaILy3UjdlwolowbBobsUG7IyH9ugwg== X-Received: by 10.46.75.1 with SMTP id y1mr5763912lja.75.1487602735833; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 06:58:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from xliuus (wsip-98-191-72-170.dc.dc.cox.net. [98.191.72.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t126sm5332378lff.31.2017.02.20.06.58.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 06:58:55 -0800 (PST) From: "Xufeng Liu" To: "'Stig Venaas \(svenaas\)'" , "'Benoit Claise'" , References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> <5f83af01-9f23-0dd7-9645-783c13a2b37f@cisco.com> <044f01d283af$f58909c0$e09b1d40$@gmail.com> <3c75171f-072d-17f4-cded-276e598d3b58@cisco.com> <006501d28867$2f0c25e0$8d2471a0$@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <006501d28867$2f0c25e0$8d2471a0$@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:58:52 -0500 Message-ID: <01f301d28b89$db18c620$914a5260$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQGqUZp2M8hY5EjoaYMYv+GLkjkkgQJldqdXArsF3TgCpyzzjQMWcCgIAZr7D3ICLoQUHgG0/nr2AU1Dj3ahNSDNwA== Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:58:59 -0000 HI Stig, We have just posted the new version. The dependency (ietf-routing-types) was also updated, so we have got what we need from that draft. Thanks, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Xufeng Liu [mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 10:13 AM > To: 'Stig Venaas (svenaas)' ; 'Benoit Claise' > ; yang-multicast@ietf.org > Cc: 'Mike McBride' > Subject: RE: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts > > Hi Stig, > > Will post the updated within a couple of days. > > Thanks, > > - Xufeng > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] > > Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 11:23 AM > > To: Benoit Claise ; Xufeng Liu > ; > > yang-multicast@ietf.org > > Cc: 'Mike McBride' > > Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts > > > > Hi > > > > On 2/10/2017 8:19 AM, Benoit Claise wrote: > > > Hi Xufeng, > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I have just updated the model with the aligned bfd and > > >> ietf-routing-types, along with some text changes to address Yang > > >> doctor's review comments. > > >> The > > >> updated model and draft have been put to GitHub: > > >> https://github.com/mcallisterjp/pim-yang > > >> I cannot publish this version yet, because it uses some > > >> un-published upcoming types from ietf-routing-types (which should > > >> be updated within a couple of weeks). > > > Instead of waiting on the dependencies, I propose that you publish > > > now with the new types. > > > While waiting for publication (of the ietf-routing-types), it > > > doesn't hurt to have the same typedefs in both dratfs. > > > We just have to remember to use the import once ietf-routing-types > > > is finalized. > > > > If you post it now I can start the WGLC. We can still make some minor > > adjustments in a couple of weeks when the routing types draft has been > updated > > and we're done with the WGLC. > > > > Stig > > > > > Regards, B. > > >> > > >> Meanwhile, can authors and contributors review this version on > > >> GitHub, and help to fix any potential issues? > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> - Xufeng > > >> > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > >>> From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] > > >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 4:35 PM > > >>> To: Xufeng Liu ; > > >>> yang-multicast@ietf.org > > >>> Cc: 'Mike McBride' > > >>> Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast > > >>> drafts > > >>> > > >>> Hi > > >>> > > >>> I'm hoping that both the pim and igmp/mld drafts can be updated > > >>> within a > > >> week > > >>> or two. I'll start WGLCs as soon as you have submitted the new > versions. > > >>> > > >>> I started the adoption call for the msdp draft. > > >>> > > >>> Stig > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Yang-multicast mailing list > > >> Yang-multicast@ietf.org > > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast > > >> . > > >> > > > > From nobody Mon Feb 20 09:59:31 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24F71293E8 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:59:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.523 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W9Y0urAYWgHj for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2956128AC9 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:59:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3312; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487613567; x=1488823167; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WJJCP4KBoKZcnLfkSs6ZptFbFdFiTmvJ8eWt/oJcPd8=; b=dI8PcDF7bAS4jUsLHRwmfCGD/z8EZFrx8AfQNKFasx9bWfNHBJj/iro1 GGS3HSjYDkhUeRXD4UikFbhno9KuNFKUWIDbI+n/0VLyteKgQmnS8hDno sqVssDlvu9hgWRkzdSKBEy3b22HyJuguF1dhGOtgMxIl+uPYEtn+9Add0 U=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,187,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="388019206" Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Feb 2017 17:59:26 +0000 Received: from [128.107.151.40] (dhcp-128-107-151-40.cisco.com [128.107.151.40]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1KHxPhp011884; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:59:26 GMT To: Xufeng Liu , "'Benoit Claise'" , yang-multicast@ietf.org References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> <5f83af01-9f23-0dd7-9645-783c13a2b37f@cisco.com> <044f01d283af$f58909c0$e09b1d40$@gmail.com> <3c75171f-072d-17f4-cded-276e598d3b58@cisco.com> <006501d28867$2f0c25e0$8d2471a0$@gmail.com> <01f301d28b89$db18c620$914a5260$@gmail.com> From: "Stig Venaas (svenaas)" Message-ID: <2ab22337-b415-0224-9a85-997fc49275b0@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:59:26 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <01f301d28b89$db18c620$914a5260$@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 17:59:30 -0000 Hi On 2/20/2017 6:58 AM, Xufeng Liu wrote: > HI Stig, > > We have just posted the new version. > > The dependency (ietf-routing-types) was also updated, so we have got what we > need from that draft. Great, I'll start WGLC then. Stig > Thanks, > > - Xufeng > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Xufeng Liu [mailto:xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 10:13 AM >> To: 'Stig Venaas (svenaas)' ; 'Benoit Claise' >> ; yang-multicast@ietf.org >> Cc: 'Mike McBride' >> Subject: RE: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts >> >> Hi Stig, >> >> Will post the updated within a couple of days. >> >> Thanks, >> >> - Xufeng >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] >>> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 11:23 AM >>> To: Benoit Claise ; Xufeng Liu >> ; >>> yang-multicast@ietf.org >>> Cc: 'Mike McBride' >>> Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> On 2/10/2017 8:19 AM, Benoit Claise wrote: >>>> Hi Xufeng, >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have just updated the model with the aligned bfd and >>>>> ietf-routing-types, along with some text changes to address Yang >>>>> doctor's review comments. >>>>> The >>>>> updated model and draft have been put to GitHub: >>>>> https://github.com/mcallisterjp/pim-yang >>>>> I cannot publish this version yet, because it uses some >>>>> un-published upcoming types from ietf-routing-types (which should >>>>> be updated within a couple of weeks). >>>> Instead of waiting on the dependencies, I propose that you publish >>>> now with the new types. >>>> While waiting for publication (of the ietf-routing-types), it >>>> doesn't hurt to have the same typedefs in both dratfs. >>>> We just have to remember to use the import once ietf-routing-types >>>> is finalized. >>> >>> If you post it now I can start the WGLC. We can still make some minor >>> adjustments in a couple of weeks when the routing types draft has been >> updated >>> and we're done with the WGLC. >>> >>> Stig >>> >>>> Regards, B. >>>>> >>>>> Meanwhile, can authors and contributors review this version on >>>>> GitHub, and help to fix any potential issues? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> - Xufeng >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 4:35 PM >>>>>> To: Xufeng Liu ; >>>>>> yang-multicast@ietf.org >>>>>> Cc: 'Mike McBride' >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast >>>>>> drafts >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm hoping that both the pim and igmp/mld drafts can be updated >>>>>> within a >>>>> week >>>>>> or two. I'll start WGLCs as soon as you have submitted the new >> versions. >>>>>> >>>>>> I started the adoption call for the msdp draft. >>>>>> >>>>>> Stig >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Yang-multicast mailing list >>>>> Yang-multicast@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-multicast >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> >> > > From nobody Mon Feb 20 10:36:19 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C366129500 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:36:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.523 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kQ0DJSaxcRu2 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34653129448 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:36:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=417; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487615775; x=1488825375; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yX4EOcYyXhjZjRxAYwoLWXa4dRQABfqPDIg6+Cpk5Bg=; b=bYkHlrRuNkYRuX4dcBEjPwDxr8IUoqmFRkt8Jl+pJOEfsB+esGbagutR T0B5AMj59omXpTRi3FzAkpx/fCbNmbVGrjLZkWoEMtwznSPkxQ37YGt3I FzurEKUaR9TKQ/b/NFZXX1EsNTqB4U8bi5W6FwAmMgYptjo7geG2waQRN Q=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,187,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="208956363" Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Feb 2017 18:36:06 +0000 Received: from [128.107.151.40] (dhcp-128-107-151-40.cisco.com [128.107.151.40]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1KIa5Tr025097; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:36:05 GMT To: Xufeng Liu , "'Benoit Claise'" , yang-multicast@ietf.org References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> <5f83af01-9f23-0dd7-9645-783c13a2b37f@cisco.com> <044f01d283af$f58909c0$e09b1d40$@gmail.com> <3c75171f-072d-17f4-cded-276e598d3b58@cisco.com> <006501d28867$2f0c25e0$8d2471a0$@gmail.com> <01f301d28b89$db18c620$914a5260$@gmail.com> <2ab22337-b415-0224-9a85-997fc49275b0@cisco.com> From: "Stig Venaas (svenaas)" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:36:05 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2ab22337-b415-0224-9a85-997fc49275b0@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:36:17 -0000 Hi I've started the WGLC, it ends March 2nd. I hope all the authors as well as everyone else on this mailing list can carefully review this last version. Of course also people in the working group in general. Did you verify that this last version compiles? Also, in order to request publishing the draft, I will need each of the authors to state whether they are aware of any IPR for this draft. Stig From nobody Mon Feb 20 10:39:27 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59C91294F3 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:39:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V6MECMuQlbhu for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:39:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf0-x243.google.com (mail-lf0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A438129443 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:39:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id h67so1492910lfg.1 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:39:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=W4fAIWuC7FLT+V0BA7HeCbbBJUe/ITH/3YnS+KOgCMA=; b=hJG9SpS9Q5cQmwNXswXUjE8g8udIprrAsF+PDZYd3D5cURhkTY6NIaiM1tn5Tde1bU Rz22Dw9EYIaumi6C/yPmR3db8kbS5dUz3uaORyWXlcSw1ownDbSnE8pcCQOmiomT+JX9 tpiArqNRPLhF2qsU1Z8T/GnUgV4pFjQ7UACJa2daviCAJDGzfW8oVg+EfmpTVvVXM8PR padHF2etluEu7ADmIypDjhZ9xM6LiV3q5BBUe+NCQxuY2HuohnjcAxo27prCSjOJYM+P a68r4YFGA4l3G/jm6lXEtSKQ747+1jHMsdrdDx/ykFAtGoYgjScsdYIn303eQbyyeoR6 VTNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=W4fAIWuC7FLT+V0BA7HeCbbBJUe/ITH/3YnS+KOgCMA=; b=Sxqt853VkxVK0JM3Oq9vtwqJ81PBQFX45C1w26knNo/uvRA41QqmUsUOcVrNICFsXt HZeP/VAgC6PoeDGi2GlYn+VlUa6XBhx2MNlk4cI00OMjLpxc+TBQ42ryYtCddzeywCX4 NECuFCn3sLgjXiMUh7LzBo4kPQUvPYUPCaMREh8GB9XrWs5yfjvUfHJzYr2mkBw+/lRI ID5bzQ7HqJApZ4ayMt602Lbw2PcxVn5zSoL+QidFNh3dYbYKhWyEbx+mSOjflU57lIHA ckbIA/EfWRq4BGsec7PxWxn3qErFktVwMbpBaVFZEP8aLa06epMet1kBdgDKiheE/jOm xsEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nDXWEUFgxG+jZV+80Yv63Je2RVgX555oGM0Lpm2Q0+0f7N2cCz13EL+isnuIrKPg== X-Received: by 10.46.84.19 with SMTP id i19mr5737036ljb.88.1487615956876; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:39:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from xliuus (wsip-98-191-72-170.dc.dc.cox.net. [98.191.72.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 64sm5439733lfs.30.2017.02.20.10.39.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:39:16 -0800 (PST) From: "Xufeng Liu" To: "'Stig Venaas \(svenaas\)'" , "'Benoit Claise'" , References: <01de01d27e41$bb29f9b0$317ded10$@gmail.com> <70cf578f-4e14-d940-575a-1f7b3b905d58@cisco.com> <01df01d27e43$0debee00$29c3ca00$@gmail.com> <5f83af01-9f23-0dd7-9645-783c13a2b37f@cisco.com> <044f01d283af$f58909c0$e09b1d40$@gmail.com> <3c75171f-072d-17f4-cded-276e598d3b58@cisco.com> <006501d28867$2f0c25e0$8d2471a0$@gmail.com> <01f301d28b89$db18c620$914a5260$@gmail.com> <2ab22337-b415-0224-9a85-997fc49275b0@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 13:39:13 -0500 Message-ID: <022301d28ba8$a3820720$ea861560$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQGqUZp2M8hY5EjoaYMYv+GLkjkkgQJldqdXArsF3TgCpyzzjQMWcCgIAZr7D3ICLoQUHgG0/nr2AU1Dj3YBRBdzqQGPtgfYAdal+D2hEAtXYA== Content-Language: en-us Archived-At: Cc: 'Mike McBride' Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:39:25 -0000 Hi Stig, Thanks. I have verified that the latest version compiles fine. Regards, - Xufeng > -----Original Message----- > From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:stig@cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 1:36 PM > To: Xufeng Liu ; 'Benoit Claise' > ; yang-multicast@ietf.org > Cc: 'Mike McBride' > Subject: Re: [Yang-multicast] Proceeding with YANG multicast drafts > > Hi > > I've started the WGLC, it ends March 2nd. I hope all the authors as well as > everyone else on this mailing list can carefully review this last version. Of course > also people in the working group in general. > > Did you verify that this last version compiles? > > Also, in order to request publishing the draft, I will need each of the authors to > state whether they are aware of any IPR for this draft. > > Stig From nobody Mon Feb 27 23:54:14 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDE01294D8; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:54:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wtQ0HT-JpD7x; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:54:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9BE91289B0; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:54:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4304; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1488268452; x=1489478052; h=to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=pNchu36K1fQSSW17tvra61cBZ5UhLtJ9Gs/YNeSjsOQ=; b=Tn1IdHrsI9228VcA0vTZXsQu7wyxhO9f+h7BkM9Qs2kQQFhvyaAzfbX+ gofi7kNEKZfb7A2kJP0iNGz+04+3QhnmcEt/yxJsHlyds5hXBvvsQrDHz 1a2K5/fU8plvRoJpNTLoXZOLN4SnTGAHhsA34UinWrxb++vFKezXHCCYi g=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ApDQC7K7VY/xbLJq1dGgEBAQECAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QgBAQEBhDEDgQaDW4p7oHmDHYIPgg0qhXiCaRYBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIUaVh8+AmA?= =?us-ascii?q?MCAEBiXAOsCaCJiuLCwEBAQEGAQEBAQEBASGGTIIFikSCXwWJD4ZCgUqLBpIqi?= =?us-ascii?q?kuGTYspiAgmBSyBASEUCBcVhww/NQGKJwEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,218,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="650021582" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Feb 2017 07:54:09 +0000 Received: from [10.61.101.37] (dhcp-10-61-101-37.cisco.com [10.61.101.37]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1S7s9R3030235; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 07:54:09 GMT To: draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang@ietf.org, yang-multicast@ietf.org From: Benoit Claise Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:54:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------917617573DC21F56DB955776" Archived-At: Cc: "rkrejci@cesnet.cz" Subject: [Yang-multicast] draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-02.txt: YANG compilation isuse X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 07:54:14 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------917617573DC21F56DB955776 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear authors, Have a look at http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html warn: Schema node "ietf-ip:ipv4" not found (/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv4). warn: Resolving must restriction "/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv4" failed. (/ietf-routing:routing/control-plane-protocols/ietf-igmp-mld:igmp/interfaces/interface/interface) warn: Schema node "ietf-ip:ipv6" not found (/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv6). warn: Resolving must restriction "/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv6" failed. (/ietf-routing:routing/control-plane-protocols/ietf-igmp-mld:mld/interfaces/interface/interface) warn: Schema node "ietf-ip:ipv4" not found (/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv4). warn: Resolving must restriction "/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv4" failed. (/ietf-routing:routing-state/control-plane-protocols/ietf-igmp-mld:igmp/interfaces/interface/interface) warn: Schema node "ietf-ip:ipv6" not found (/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv6). warn: Resolving must restriction "/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv6" failed. (/ietf-routing:routing-state/control-plane-protocols/ietf-igmp-mld:mld/interfaces/interface/interface) Regards, Benoit --------------917617573DC21F56DB955776 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear authors,

Have a look at http://www.claise.be/IETFYANGPageCompilation.html
warn: Schema node "ietf-ip:ipv4" not found (/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv4).
warn: Resolving must restriction "/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv4" failed. (/ietf-routing:routing/control-plane-protocols/ietf-igmp-mld:igmp/interfaces/interface/interface)
warn: Schema node "ietf-ip:ipv6" not found (/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv6).
warn: Resolving must restriction "/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv6" failed. (/ietf-routing:routing/control-plane-protocols/ietf-igmp-mld:mld/interfaces/interface/interface)
warn: Schema node "ietf-ip:ipv4" not found (/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv4).
warn: Resolving must restriction "/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv4" failed. (/ietf-routing:routing-state/control-plane-protocols/ietf-igmp-mld:igmp/interfaces/interface/interface)
warn: Schema node "ietf-ip:ipv6" not found (/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv6).
warn: Resolving must restriction "/ietf-interfaces:interfaces/ietf-interfaces:interface[ietf-interfaces:name = current()]/ietf-ip:ipv6" failed. (/ietf-routing:routing-state/control-plane-protocols/ietf-igmp-mld:mld/interfaces/interface/interface)

Regards, Benoit
--------------917617573DC21F56DB955776-- From nobody Tue Feb 28 08:13:09 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: yang-multicast@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73A21294F7 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:13:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=calix.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CX966NOqqQnb for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:13:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02lp0051.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CC55129519 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 08:06:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=CALIX.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-calix-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=x7BO1QXEIRLHPjkXHfrpGHNx52E8Dgux1ewEfZWzIBo=; b=d1nnxLCBgIXZPaFwXnHBz//R0zK/ps1At+DVRd2/SZMRSp3L2+QDlo0v8i2DzT6euuUSCvs8cimqhHqeLxXbDn2qBRa4KxO3Q2zKlQ60I1dGgqmdWarEo6OMAUc+nqaLxZsRAZ5M1QSy1epk6Z3cJVlsBhuI9r+WZOYL2ZsqRfk= Received: from BY2PR0501MB1734.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.154.20) by BY2PR0501MB1734.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.154.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.947.2; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:06:31 +0000 Received: from BY2PR0501MB1734.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.154.20]) by BY2PR0501MB1734.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.154.20]) with mapi id 15.01.0947.010; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:06:31 +0000 From: Marta Seda To: "yang-multicast@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Broadband Forum Multicast Yang Thread-Index: AdKR13DPfoDoB8azT8C6qZ8hWBJ1iw== Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:06:31 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Marta.Seda@calix.com; x-originating-ip: [23.118.53.86] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8ffa64bd-19a9-4942-32e3-08d45ff3c2d5 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001); SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1734; x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR0501MB1734; 7:xbEtLVGBRF336LqNA+/8C3IIoy3y6prW36dEn4Y0wMSHk233P72BEyLJMq3A3DzGd+r9ABoDi8IWXEfpDeRbOjIDh0XxcOaJkNzU/vqdu3pAwWSITO66ws60aDl2mh1+g/oRlk2ZdCIOXVHmbVjZYa0PeYaPR7NJSoxgqGsUxp2Dba30p4HxSVMn+4hmcqxIKqjaEiWUW+dhbMW6q5uTzV7mgRAYQT84Hd/nwoSGg5WH8/IjOZ/HhJxEWob3tlSHz5HJDu8Ei2PRR2Vnh1MBAKJwC+J3kf+LGRpD6LaLAWK6zwejcxBfMpmmh1iDOblHxtxnAA4v+/ywg5VplP7oVA== x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(102415395)(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6041248)(20161123558025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1734; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1734; x-forefront-prvs: 0232B30BBC x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(979002)(6009001)(7916002)(39450400003)(189002)(199003)(3846002)(68736007)(2906002)(2351001)(3480700004)(9326002)(102836003)(81156014)(8676002)(81166006)(8936002)(33656002)(106356001)(3660700001)(790700001)(55016002)(9686003)(99286003)(6306002)(77096006)(2501003)(7696004)(5640700003)(54896002)(5630700001)(25786008)(6506006)(6916009)(5660300001)(6436002)(54356999)(101416001)(53936002)(189998001)(110136004)(74316002)(6116002)(122556002)(97736004)(2900100001)(3280700002)(105586002)(38730400002)(86362001)(66066001)(50986999)(7736002)(92566002)(99936001)(4326008)(969003)(989001)(999001)(1009001)(1019001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR0501MB1734; H:BY2PR0501MB1734.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: calix.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_005_BY2PR0501MB17349090FDB2B524542279E79C560BY2PR0501MB1734_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: calix.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Feb 2017 16:06:31.5276 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 8ffae2e5-6ff0-4510-bbf3-ca842d7ca55e X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR0501MB1734 Archived-At: Cc: 'William Lupton' Subject: [Yang-multicast] Broadband Forum Multicast Yang X-BeenThere: yang-multicast@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: YANG Multicast List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 16:13:08 -0000 --_005_BY2PR0501MB17349090FDB2B524542279E79C560BY2PR0501MB1734_ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY2PR0501MB17349090FDB2B524542279E79C560BY2PR0501MB1734_" --_000_BY2PR0501MB17349090FDB2B524542279E79C560BY2PR0501MB1734_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I have been following the discussions in IETF on support of multicast igmp/= mld yang. I wanted this group to be aware that Broadband Forum has been wo= rking on a multicast yang model for layer 2 access devices. The BBF yang = models have been developed to satisfy the following common access requireme= nts: * Support of snoopers and proxies * Support of igmpv2, igmpv3, mld2 (other older variants are largely not= deployed on access devices therefore not considered). * Support of open access (different subscribers on a layer 2 device can= receive services of different providers). Open access in the BBF model do= es not require SSM support (segregation is done via other means) * Support of admission control (that limits how much bandwidth and chan= nels are delivered) * Support of access specific requirements (e.g., unauthorized joins) Broadband Forum and IETF have collaborated in the past (e.g., deferred the = development of yang models to respective standards bodies). As I review th= e proposed IETF model, it seems that the IETF model is developed around lay= er 3 multicast routers (the IETF model augments from the routing module). = Therefore I see no need to align the two models (IETF is focusing on layer = 3 devices whereas BBF is focusing on layer 2 devices). The requirements of= both product spaces is different. However there may be some areas that th= ere could be some collaboration. For example, the statistics are "similar" = in both models (BBF has more statistics than IETF but IETF uses 64 bit coun= ters whereas BBF chose 32 bits because of the desire to align to RFC 5519).= There are some attributes in the IETF model that I do not recognize and m= ay be specific to multicast routers: +--rw max-entries? uint32 {global-max-entries}? Q: There is the max-grou= ps read/write attribute. What specifically does the max-entries limit? Wha= t does this correspond to in RFC 5519? +--ro filter-mode? Enumeration Q: What does this correspond to in RF= C 5519? Best regards, Marta Seda --_000_BY2PR0501MB17349090FDB2B524542279E79C560BY2PR0501MB1734_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

 

I have been following the discussions in IETF on sup= port of multicast igmp/mld yang.  I wanted this group to be aware that= Broadband Forum has been working on a multicast yang model for layer 2 acc= ess devices.   The BBF yang models have been developed to satisfy the following common access requirements:  =

  • Support of snoopers and proxies
  • Support of igmpv2, igmpv3, mld2 (other older variants= are largely not deployed on access devices therefore not considered). = ;
  • Support of open access (different subscribers on a la= yer 2 device can receive services of different providers).  Open acces= s in the BBF model does not require SSM support (segregation is done via other means)
  • Support of admission control= (that limits how much bandwidth and channels are delivered)
  • Support of access specific requirements (e.g., unauthorized joins)

 

Broadband Forum and IETF have collaborated in the pa= st (e.g., deferred the development of yang models to respective standards b= odies).  As I review the proposed IETF model, it seems that the IETF m= odel is developed around layer 3 multicast routers (the IETF model augments from the routing module).  Therefore= I see no need to align the two models (IETF is focusing on layer 3 devices= whereas BBF is focusing on layer 2 devices).  The requirements of bot= h product spaces is different.  However there may be some areas that there could be some collaboration. For example, the= statistics are “similar” in both models (BBF has more statisti= cs than IETF but IETF uses 64 bit counters whereas BBF chose 32 bits becaus= e of the desire to align to RFC 5519).  There are some attributes in the IETF model that I do not recognize and may be s= pecific to multicast routers:

 

+--rw max-entries?&n= bsp;  uint32 {global-max-entries}? Q:  There is the max-groups re= ad/write attribute.  What specifically does the max-entries limit? What does this correspond to in RFC 5519= ?

  +--ro filter-= mode?     Enumeration Q:  What does this correspon= d to in RFC 5519?

 =

Best regards,=

 =

Marta Seda

 

 

--_000_BY2PR0501MB17349090FDB2B524542279E79C560BY2PR0501MB1734_-- --_005_BY2PR0501MB17349090FDB2B524542279E79C560BY2PR0501MB1734_ Content-Type: text/plain; name="bbf-mgmd.tree.txt" Content-Description: bbf-mgmd.tree.txt Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bbf-mgmd.tree.txt"; size=4395; creation-date="Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:40:30 GMT"; modification-date="Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:40:30 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 bW9kdWxlOiBiYmYtbWdtZAogICAgKy0tcncgbXVsdGljYXN0CiAgICAgICArLS1ydyBtZ21kCiAg ICAgICAgICArLS1ydyBtdWx0aWNhc3Qtc25vb3AtcHJvZmlsZSogW25hbWVdIHttZ21kLXNub29w fT8KICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3IG5hbWUgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGJiZjpu YW1lLXN0cmluZwogICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncgaW1tZWRpYXRlLWxlYXZlPyAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgZW51bWVyYXRpb24KICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3IGxhc3QtbWVtYmVyLXF1ZXJ5LWludGVy dmFsPyAgIHVpbnQzMgogICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncgbGFzdC1tZW1iZXItcXVlcnktY291bnQ/ ICAgICAgdWludDMyCiAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ydyBwcm94eS1yZXBvcnRpbmc/ICAgICAgICAg ICAgICBlbnVtZXJhdGlvbgogICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncgcmVwb3J0LXN1cHByZXNzaW9uPyAg ICAgICAgICAgZW51bWVyYXRpb24KICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3IGludGVyZmFjZS12ZXJzaW9u PyAgICAgICAgICAgIGVudW1lcmF0aW9uCiAgICAgICAgICArLS1ydyBtdWx0aWNhc3QtcHJveHkt cHJvZmlsZSogW25hbWVdIHttZ21kLXByb3h5fT8KICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3IG5hbWUgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGJiZjpuYW1lLXN0cmluZwogICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncg cXVlcnktaW50ZXJ2YWw/ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgdWludDMyCiAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ydyBx dWVyeS1tYXgtcmVzcG9uc2UtdGltZT8gICAgICB1aW50MzIKICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3IGlt bWVkaWF0ZS1sZWF2ZT8gICAgICAgICAgICAgIGVudW1lcmF0aW9uCiAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1y dyByb2J1c3RuZXNzPyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB1aW50MzIKICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3 IGxhc3QtbWVtYmVyLXF1ZXJ5LWludGVydmFsPyAgIHVpbnQzMgogICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncg bGFzdC1tZW1iZXItcXVlcnktY291bnQ/ICAgICAgdWludDMyCiAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ydyBz dGFydHVwLXF1ZXJ5LWNvdW50PyAgICAgICAgICB1aW50MzIKICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3IHN0 YXJ0dXAtcXVlcnktaW50ZXJ2YWw/ICAgICAgIHVpbnQzMgogICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncgaW50 ZXJmYWNlLXZlcnNpb24/ICAgICAgICAgICAgZW51bWVyYXRpb24KICAgICAgICAgICstLXJ3IG11 bHRpY2FzdC12cG4qIFtuYW1lXQogICAgICAgICAgICAgKy0tcncgbmFtZSAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGJiZjpuYW1lLXN0cmluZwogICAgICAgICAgICAgKy0tcncgbW9kZT8g ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIG1nbWQtbW9kZQogICAgICAgICAgICAgKy0tcncg dW5hdXRob3JpemVkLWpvaW4tcmVxdWVzdD8gICAgICAgIGVudW1lcmF0aW9uCiAgICAgICAgICAg ICArLS1ydyB1c2UtbXVsdGljYXN0LXBhY2thZ2U/ICAgICAgICAgICAgZW51bWVyYXRpb24KICAg ICAgICAgICAgICstLXJ3IG11bHRpY2FzdC1wcm94eS1wcm9maWxlLW5hbWU/ICAgICBtdWx0aWNh c3QtcHJveHktcHJvZmlsZS1yZWYge21nbWQtcHJveHl9PwogICAgICAgICAgICAgKy0tcncgbXVs dGljYXN0LXNub29wLXByb2ZpbGUtbmFtZT8gICAgIG11bHRpY2FzdC1zbm9vcC1wcm9maWxlLXJl ZiB7bWdtZC1zbm9vcH0/CiAgICAgICAgICAgICArLS1ydyBtdWx0aWNhc3Qtc3Vic2NyaWJlci1p bnRlcmZhY2UqIFtuYW1lXQogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncgbmFtZSAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgYmJmOm5hbWUtc3RyaW5nCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1y dyBpbnRlcmZhY2UtbmFtZT8gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBpZjppbnRlcmZhY2UtcmVm CiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ydyBtYXgtZ3JvdXAtbnVtYmVyPyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICBpbnQzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncgbXVsdGljYXN0LXJhdGUtbGltaXQ/ICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgdWludDMyIHttdWx0aWNhc3QtY2FjfT8KICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICst LXJ3IG11bHRpY2FzdC1yYXRlLWxpbWl0LWNvbmZvcm0tYWN0aW9uPyAgIHJhdGUtbGltaXQtYWN0 aW9uLWVudW0ge211bHRpY2FzdC1jYWN9PwogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncgbXVsdGljYXN0 LXJhdGUtbGltaXQtZXhjZWVkLWFjdGlvbj8gICAgcmF0ZS1saW1pdC1hY3Rpb24tZW51bSB7bXVs dGljYXN0LWNhY30/CiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS0teCBjbGVhci1zdWJzY3JpYmVyLWludGVy ZmFjZS1zdGF0cwogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgICAgKy0tLXcgaW5wdXQKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwg ICAgICAgICstLS13IHN1YnNjcmliZXItaW50ZXJmYWNlLW5hbWU/ICAgc3RyaW5nCiAgICAgICAg ICAgICArLS1ydyBtdWx0aWNhc3QtbmV0d29yay1pbnRlcmZhY2UqIFtuYW1lXQogICAgICAgICAg ICAgfCAgKy0tcncgbmFtZSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgYmJmOm5hbWUtc3Ry aW5nCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ydyAobXVsdGljYXN0LXRyYW5zcG9ydCkKICAgICAgICAg ICAgIHwgIHwgICstLTooc2luZ2xlLWluY29taW5nLXBvaW50KQogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgfCAg ICAgKy0tcncgbXVsdGljYXN0LXZsYW4/ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgaWY6aW50ZXJmYWNlLXJl ZgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncgaXAtaG9zdD8gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg aWY6aW50ZXJmYWNlLXJlZgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tLXggY2xlYXItbmV0d29yay1pbnRl cmZhY2Utc3RhdHMKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICAgICstLS13IGlucHV0CiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8 ICAgICAgICArLS0tdyBtb2R1bGUtbmFtZT8gICBzdHJpbmcKICAgICAgICAgICAgICstLXJ3IG11 bHRpY2FzdC1jaGFubmVsKiBbbmFtZV0KICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3IG5hbWUgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBiYmY6bmFtZS1zdHJpbmcKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3 IGlnbXAtbmV0d29yay1pbnRlcmZhY2UtbmFtZSAgICAtPiAvbXVsdGljYXN0L21nbWQvbXVsdGlj YXN0LXZwbltuYW1lID0gY3VycmVudCgpLy4uLy4uL25hbWVdL211bHRpY2FzdC1uZXR3b3JrLWlu dGVyZmFjZS9uYW1lCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ydyBncm91cC1hZGRyZXNzPyAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgaW5ldDppcC1hZGRyZXNzCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ydyBncm91cC1hZGRy ZXNzLWVuZD8gICAgICAgICAgICAgaW5ldDppcHY0LWFkZHJlc3Mge2lnbXAtdHlwZXM6aWdtcC1n cm91cC1pcC1yYW5nZX0/CiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ydyBzb3VyY2UtYWRkcmVzcz8gICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgaW5ldDppcC1hZGRyZXNzCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ydyBpcy1wcmV2 aWV3PyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgYm9vbGVhbgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncgcHJl dmlldy1yZXBlYXQtdGltZT8gICAgICAgICAgIHVpbnQzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncg cHJldmlldy1yZXBlYXQtY291bnQ/ICAgICAgICAgIHVpbnQzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0t cncgcHJldmlldy1yZXNldC10aW1lPyAgICAgICAgICAgIHVpbnQzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAg Ky0tcncgcHJldmlldy1sZW5ndGg/ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHVpbnQzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAg Ky0tcncgbWdtZC1wYWNrYWdlKiBbbmFtZV0KICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3IG5hbWUgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBiYmY6bmFtZS1zdHJpbmcKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICst LXJ3IGlnbXAtbXVsdGljYXN0LWNoYW5uZWwtbGlzdCogICAtPiAvbXVsdGljYXN0L21nbWQvbXVs dGljYXN0LXZwbltuYW1lID0gY3VycmVudCgpLy4uLy4uL25hbWVdL211bHRpY2FzdC1jaGFubmVs L25hbWUKICAgICAgICAgICAgICstLXJ3IHN0YXRpYy1tdWx0aWNhc3QtZ3JvdXAqIFtuYW1lXQog ICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcncgbmFtZSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBzdHJp bmcKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJ3IHN0YXRpYy1tdWx0aWNhc3QtZ3JvdXAtZW50cnkqIFtp bmRleF0KICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICAgICstLXJ3IGluZGV4ICAgICAgICAgICAgIHVpbnQzMgog ICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgICAgKy0tcncgZ3JvdXAtYWRkcmVzcz8gICAgaW5ldDppcC1hZGRyZXNz CiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAgICArLS1ydyBzb3VyY2UtYWRkcmVzcz8gICBpbmV0OmlwLWFkZHJl c3MKICAgICAgICAgICAgICstLS14IGNsZWFyLXZwbi1zdGF0cwogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKy0t LXcgaW5wdXQKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICstLS13IG11bHRpY2FzdC12cG4tbmFtZT8gICBz dHJpbmcK --_005_BY2PR0501MB17349090FDB2B524542279E79C560BY2PR0501MB1734_ Content-Type: text/plain; name="bbf-mgmd-state.tree.txt" Content-Description: bbf-mgmd-state.tree.txt Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="bbf-mgmd-state.tree.txt"; size=4018; creation-date="Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:40:30 GMT"; modification-date="Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:40:30 GMT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 bW9kdWxlOiBiYmYtbWdtZC1zdGF0ZQogICAgKy0tcm8gbXVsdGljYXN0LXN0YXRlCiAgICAgICAr LS1ybyBtZ21kCiAgICAgICAgICArLS1ybyBtdWx0aWNhc3QtdnBuKiBbbmFtZV0KICAgICAgICAg ICAgICstLXJvIG5hbWUgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBiYmYteWFuZzpuYW1l LXN0cmluZwogICAgICAgICAgICAgKy0tcm8gbXVsdGljYXN0LXN1YnNjcmliZXItaW50ZXJmYWNl KiBbbmFtZV0KICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJvIG5hbWUgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgYmJmLXlhbmc6bmFtZS1zdHJpbmcKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJv IG51bWJlci1hY3RpdmUtZ3JvdXBzPyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgdWludDMyCiAgICAgICAg ICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyBpbnRlcmZhY2Utd3JvbmctdmVyc2lvbi1xdWVyaWVzLWNvdW50PyAgIHlh bmc6Y291bnRlcjMyCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyB0b3RhbC1sZWF2ZXMtcngtY291bnRl cj8gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHlhbmc6Y291bnRlcjMyCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyB0 b3RhbC1qb2lucy1yeC1jb3VudGVyPyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHlhbmc6Y291bnRlcjMyCiAg ICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyB0b3RhbC1pbnZhbGlkLW1lc3NhZ2UtcngtY291bnRlcj8gICAg ICAgIHlhbmc6Y291bnRlcjMyCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyB0b3RhbC1sZWF2ZXMtdHgt Y291bnRlcj8gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHlhbmc6Y291bnRlcjMyCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICAr LS1ybyB0b3RhbC1qb2lucy10eC1jb3VudGVyPyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHlhbmc6Y291bnRl cjMyCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyBzdWNjZXNzZnVsLWpvaW4tcmVxdWVzdC1jb3VudGVy PyAgICAgICAgIHlhbmc6Y291bnRlcjMyCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyB1bnN1Y2Nlc3Nm dWwtam9pbi1yZXF1ZXN0LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAgIHlhbmc6Y291bnRlcjMyCiAgICAgICAgICAg ICB8ICArLS1ybyB0b3RhbC1nZW5lcmFsLXF1ZXJpZXMtcngtY291bnRlcj8gICAgICAgIHlhbmc6 Y291bnRlcjMyCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyB0b3RhbC1zcGVjaWZpYy1xdWVyaWVzLXJ4 LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAgIHlhbmc6Y291bnRlcjMyCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyB0b3Rh bC1nZW5lcmFsLXF1ZXJpZXMtdHgtY291bnRlcj8gICAgICAgIHlhbmc6Y291bnRlcjMyCiAgICAg ICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyB0b3RhbC1zcGVjaWZpYy1xdWVyaWVzLXR4LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAg IHlhbmc6Y291bnRlcjMyCiAgICAgICAgICAgICB8ICArLS1ybyBjdXJyZW50LW11bHRpY2FzdC1i dy1kZWxpdmVyZWQ/ICAgICAgICAgIHVpbnQzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gYmFuZHdp ZHRoLWV4Y2VlZGVkLWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAgICAgICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAg ICAgICAgKy0tcm8gbXVsdGljYXN0LW5ldHdvcmstaW50ZXJmYWNlKiBbbmFtZV0KICAgICAgICAg ICAgIHwgICstLXJvIG5hbWUgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBiYmYteWFuZzpuYW1lLXN0cmluZwogICAg ICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gcXVlcmllci1hZGRyZXNzPyAgIGluZXQ6aXAtYWRkcmVzcwogICAg ICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gcXVlcmllci11cHRpbWU/ICAgIHlhbmc6dGltZXRpY2tzCiAgICAg ICAgICAgICArLS1ybyBtdWx0aWNhc3QtcHJveHkge2lnbXAtY29uZmlnOm1nbWQtcHJveHl9Pwog ICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gaW50ZXJmYWNlLXdyb25nLXZlcnNpb24tcXVlcmllcy1jb3Vu dD8gICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gdG90YWwtbGVhdmVzLXJ4 LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAg Ky0tcm8gdG90YWwtam9pbnMtcngtY291bnRlcj8gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50 ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gdG90YWwtaW52YWxpZC1tZXNzYWdlLXJ4LWNvdW50 ZXI/ICAgICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gdG90YWwtbGVh dmVzLXR4LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAg ICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gdG90YWwtam9pbnMtdHgtY291bnRlcj8gICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICB5YW5n OmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gc3VjY2Vzc2Z1bC1qb2luLXJlcXVlc3Qt Y291bnRlcj8gICAgICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gdW5z dWNjZXNzZnVsLWpvaW4tcmVxdWVzdC1jb3VudGVyPyAgICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAg ICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gdG90YWwtZ2VuZXJhbC1xdWVyaWVzLXJ4LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAg ICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gdG90YWwtc3BlY2lmaWMtcXVl cmllcy1yeC1jb3VudGVyPyAgICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0t cm8gdG90YWwtZ2VuZXJhbC1xdWVyaWVzLXR4LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIz MgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gdG90YWwtc3BlY2lmaWMtcXVlcmllcy10eC1jb3VudGVy PyAgICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAgKy0tcm8gdG90YWwtY3VycmVu dGx5LWFjdGl2ZS1ob3N0LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICB5YW5nOmNvdW50ZXIzMgogICAgICAgICAgICAg fCAgKy0tcm8gaG9zdC1pbnRlcmZhY2UtdmVyc2lvbjItcXVlcmllci10aW1lPyAgICB5YW5nOnRp bWV0aWNrcwogICAgICAgICAgICAgKy0tcm8gbXVsdGljYXN0LXNub29wIHtpZ21wLWNvbmZpZzpt Z21kLXNub29wfT8KICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJvIGludGVyZmFjZS13cm9uZy12ZXJzaW9u LXF1ZXJpZXMtY291bnQ/ICAgeWFuZzpjb3VudGVyMzIKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJvIHRv dGFsLWxlYXZlcy1yeC1jb3VudGVyPyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgeWFuZzpjb3VudGVyMzIKICAg ICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJvIHRvdGFsLWpvaW5zLXJ4LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgeWFuZzpjb3VudGVyMzIKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJvIHRvdGFsLWludmFsaWQtbWVz c2FnZS1yeC1jb3VudGVyPyAgICAgICAgeWFuZzpjb3VudGVyMzIKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICst LXJvIHRvdGFsLWxlYXZlcy10eC1jb3VudGVyPyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgeWFuZzpjb3VudGVy MzIKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJvIHRvdGFsLWpvaW5zLXR4LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgeWFuZzpjb3VudGVyMzIKICAgICAgICAgICAgIHwgICstLXJvIHN1Y2Nlc3NmdWwt am9pbi1yZXF1ZXN0LWNvdW50ZXI/ICAgICAgICAgeWFuZzpjb3VudGVyMzIKICAgICAgICAgICAg IHwgICstLXJvIHVuc3VjY2Vzc2Z1bC1qb2luLXJlcXVlc3QtY291bnRlcj8gICAgICAgeWFuZzpj b3VudGVyMzIKICAgICAgICAgICAgICstLXJvIGFjdGl2ZS1jaGFubmVsKiBbbmFtZV0KICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICstLXJvIG5hbWUgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBzdHJpbmcKICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICstLXJvIG11bHRpY2FzdC1pZj8gICAgICAgICAgICBpZjppbnRlcmZhY2UtcmVmCiAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICArLS1ybyBzdWJzY3JpYmVyLWlmPyAgICAgICAgICAgaWY6aW50ZXJmYWNl LXJlZgogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKy0tcm8gc291cmNlLWlwPyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGluZXQ6 aXAtYWRkcmVzcwogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKy0tcm8gdXB0aW1lPyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IHlhbmc6dGltZXRpY2tzCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICArLS1ybyBncm91cC1hZGRyZXNzPyAgICAg ICAgICAgaW5ldDppcC1hZGRyZXNzCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICArLS1ybyBob3N0LXJlcG9ydGVy LWFkZHJlc3M/ICAgaW5ldDppcC1hZGRyZXNzCg== --_005_BY2PR0501MB17349090FDB2B524542279E79C560BY2PR0501MB1734_--