Subject: Please comment on [LL67] and [LL61]

From: Erik Guttman <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 16:47:42 +0200 (MEST)

The two most important changes in my mind are LL61 and LL67.
These call for changes to the protocol to correct errors which
entered the specification due to the change process.

We have broad agreement so far that LL61 should be accepted,
but only Philip Nye, myself and Stuart supporting LL67.  Please
take a good look at these issues and respond in the next week.

Best regards and thanks for your assistance,

Erik